You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 Re: Guns N' Roses » "In Search of Checkmate" » 848 weeks ago
if checkmate is anything like catcher i'll be bummed out
that '99 shit sucks IMO
Really? Based off CITR and Chinese D, I'm definitely interested in hearing more of the 99' era stuff.
#2 Re: Guns N' Roses » "In Search of Checkmate" » 848 weeks ago
It's not that I'm only looking for 'Checkmate'. Hell, I'm open to whatever material may come out of this search (and new promising leads have). It just sounds a little safer than saying the "L" word on a shitload of public forums. I think a couple of people can vouch for me when I say, that word seems to anger certain groups of people.
bigbri - please. *rolls eyes* I'm starting to think a pacifier may be more suitable for you than new material. lol
#3 Re: Guns N' Roses » "In Search of Checkmate" » 848 weeks ago
Have you stumbled upon anything other than that original "Checkmate" clip?
No Checkmate thus far. But, the search has led to some other interesting "info" that will hopefully transpire into more.
Yeah, I didn't realize Phrozen had a site until he approached me offering his support. Cool guy.
#4 Guns N' Roses » "In Search of Checkmate" » 848 weeks ago
- Incognito
- Replies: 42
Hey guys. Just wanting to get the word out.
Anyone in possession of the entire 'Checkmate' demo who is interested in trading it for 19 mins of 2002 VMA rehearsal footage, please PM me to discuss arrangements.
Check out the link. Phrozen Inferno was nice enough to get it started for me.
http://reincarnated.phpbbweb.com
P.S. - I'm digging the new layout, guys. Very nice.
#5 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 848 weeks ago
Goddamnit! I'm going to spell this out for BOTH of you. Unless your attaching a link to a leak, NOONE gives a fuck what you guys have to say. Most of us can barely tolerate you, especially when all you guys do is bicker back and forth and post short stories about how the other one is so wrong and off the mark.
^ 
#6 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 848 weeks ago
Incognito, no wonder people have such a low opinion of you. I just state something straight out, yet you respond like a sarcastic asshole.
Would just like to point out this cat's comments he made yesterday when he started this thread:
He's going after Checkmate. I know I've given him shit here, but he's a fan like us trying to get us all some music. If he has the time, effort and know-how to do it, good luck.
^ Is it fair to say that somebody may not have taken their medication today.
*yawn*
#7 Re: Guns N' Roses » T minus --:-- and counting.... » 848 weeks ago
Just incase anyone gets there hopes up. This has nothing to do with new gnr material surfacing. We're planning to launch the new site soon and james is obviously rather excited about it
Maybe we'll have to work extra hard to make new material surface to mark the occassion.
#8 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 848 weeks ago
I detest hoarding, I can't help it. That will forever pit me against you. I know you don't care. Just know when you post here, I'll be here to respond.
You have no idea how much that hurts me. I'll try my best to sleep tonight knowing you feel this way.
*^ considering this guy's original post in this thread, starting to think rationale thought isn't his thing.
#9 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 848 weeks ago
Am I the only one left wondering after reading that AR tantrum, what the fuck he is even talking about. He kept talking of exposing the truth about me and how I went talking behind his back, yet I simply took the comments that he made in the PUBLIC CHAT, and repeated them here. He didn't make the remark via a PM. Except where he was ignorant enough to try and bribe me for contact info. *shakes head* AR, you do realize that there are many many others outside of me and MSL who think you are full of it, right? I believe one wise sole said it best once that you try and involve yourself with things that you have nothing to do with. Sorry bro, it's true.
This rant is another perfect example of that. You talk of revealing things anf mention the "poor chinese democracy" community, yet I have a mod from that forum who has called me on the phone just last week to discuss things. I received probably 10-12 PMs today from people telling me they appreciate the efforts. So again, you are making up stories in your head and try to make things into situations that they aren't. At what point throughout that tantrum of yours did you prove or expose anything? Well, aside from how much of an immature individual you can truly be. I really do feel sorry for you, man.
** My apologies to the management and members of the forum for having to bore yourself with this.
#10 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 848 weeks ago
Frankly, I feel you want to become an MSL, but you're never gonna get there this way.
Bri, I assure you that I have no interest or desire in becoming the next MSL. He's a cool guy and I appreciate evrything that he has done, but I'm not looking for a similar situation. I think dark would even confirm that with A phone converation that we've had.
If what you accuse me of having is true, and I'm interested in being the next MSL, wouldn't it seem that I would be taking actions all together different and then shouting it from the rooftops?
