You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Sun reviews Chinese Democracy » 836 weeks ago

ohh i see, so presumably hes posting under the philosophy that if the album fails he'll see a reunion? no wonder hes BAAAWWWWWWWing.

#2 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Sun reviews Chinese Democracy » 836 weeks ago

Bono wrote:
Captain Winkler wrote:

i am just here to gloat, high bono, hi buzzsaw, hi sic, hi anyone else who said the album was rubbish and that no one will like it, 4 stars from rollingstone and now this, comparing it with the beatles? oh my ya'll must be seething.

You are a comnplete moron. When and where did I ever say the album was rubbish you small minded ass. Talk to me a year after it's release and lets' see how well it's stood the test of time. How many people look back oh so fondly on it. You're like a child claiming victory over something that hasn't even happened yet. You're like that guy who starts gloating when his team dominates in the first half but when everything goes south in the second half you'l be nowhere to be found. You are clearly a  dellusional fuck who has no reading comprehension skills whatsoever. I've clearly stated that if the music is good and people dig it that's great cause the world can always use good music. you're a piss ant and really reflect the type of person this forum so brilliantly managed to avoid for so long.

are you mad because its receiving positive reviews?

#3 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Sun reviews Chinese Democracy » 836 weeks ago

axlin, the sun is the most read paper in Britain, the caliber of reviewer is average however their opinion is glowing, thats what is important.

#4 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Sun reviews Chinese Democracy » 836 weeks ago

so if its positive the reviewer has been bribed, if its negative they're objective and intelligent, i see.

#5 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Sun reviews Chinese Democracy » 836 weeks ago

i am just here to gloat, high bono, hi buzzsaw, hi sic, hi anyone else who said the album was rubbish and that no one will like it, 4 stars from rollingstone and now this, comparing it with the beatles? oh my ya'll must be seething.

#6 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Guns N' Roses: Is It All Over? Does Anyone Care?" » 836 weeks ago

dylan aint a wrong star, hes a magician, a musician and a song writer: one of the best, not a rock star. axl is the epitome of rockstar, the last one left standing.

#7 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Guns N' Roses: Is It All Over? Does Anyone Care?" » 836 weeks ago

russ were you sent here by jarmo? LOL SOUNDS LIKE IT MAN

can't wait for this thing to bomb so i can come back here and laugh in all you guys faces, anyone who thinks otherwise is way too far up axl's ass or just plain stupid, look man as a GNR fan i expect  the single to do better than SCOM, is that expecting  too much? didnt think so losers ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,

wait i am supposed to be a fan too oshi-

#8 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Guns N' Roses: Is It All Over? Does Anyone Care?" » 836 weeks ago

giving the thread a sense of reality

that's how i like to phrase it.

#9 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Guns N' Roses: Is It All Over? Does Anyone Care?" » 836 weeks ago

millions yes, the bulk of that 90 million? no, 4 million from greatest hits as well as a maybe 2 million from AFD sales since the year 2000 doesnt really equate to a high percentage of that 90 million does it?

#10 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Guns N' Roses: Is It All Over? Does Anyone Care?" » 836 weeks ago

oh dear, oh my, 90 million albums sold, is that since the turn of the 21st century? like the bulk of greenday's albums? or is the majority of those sales figures comprised in the 80's and 90's?

GNR ARE AS ACTIVE AND MAINSTREAM AS NICKELBACK, THEY HAVE RELEASED CONSECUTIVE HIT ALBUMS OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS AND FOR THEM NOT TO TOP THE HOT 100 IS JUST UNACCEPTABLE.

'i is i intelligent, cuz if i says u is from jarmo it gives the impression us is dumb but in reality i is ze stuupid one, YIPPEE!'

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB