You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#102 Re: Guns N' Roses » Billboard confirm Coachella and possible US tour » 495 weeks ago

And no beard too, that always aged him badly.

#103 Re: Guns N' Roses » Billboard confirm Coachella and possible US tour » 495 weeks ago

FlashFlood wrote:

Wtf has this guy been consuming for a year and a half?

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/new-ph … ed-online/

Not that I personally care what the guy looks like but they will get hammered by the casuals if he looks like this and sounds like shit.

I actually thought he looked alot better than Vegas. No loose clothes to hide podge, and no glasses to hide behind. He could well be making a big effort here. And so he should.

#104 Re: Guns N' Roses » Because... Exciting Times!!! » 495 weeks ago

What got me, was the move from referring to Slash & Duff as 'ex-guns', to 'guns'.  Duff's tribute to Lemmy yesterday was marked as 'Duff McKagen - Guns n Roses bassist'.  Seeing that in print, that's kinda when it really hit me. It is totally surreal after following all the shit in the circus from 2002 till now.

#105 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 502 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

I don't buy this line up. I might buy it for a tour. But a reunion of the original band will happen, if only for one night, IT WILL HAPPEN.

Me neither, personally I don't like the term reunion if it's got Fortus or Frank in it. I know the average Joe wont care that much, Axl, Slash & Duff is enough, but if it does end up F&F instead of Izzy, Matt or Steven, it's a slap in the face imo.

No disrespect to Fortus, or Frank at all, seen em & liked em, but for a reunion, I'd rather see Gilby up there with Izzy from time to time. Make some effort to have it a proper reunion.  And if Steven doesn't get a look-in at all, I'll be disappointed with both Slash & Duff tbh for agreeing to do it without him.

#106 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 502 weeks ago

Cramer wrote:

I'll take an inebriated middle aged hoochie, directly affiliated with Duff's spouse, talking out the side of her botox frozen mug over an online "insider" any day of the week.

Lol at the description!

Cramer wrote:

And perhaps we should take heed of GnR's "read between the lines" tweet. That photo Duff included is no mistake or coincidence. In fact it's pretty darn straight forward if you ask me.

I usually don't go in for these type of co-incidences, trying to read something that's not, but this seems too blatant to me, as you said - straight forward.

#107 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 502 weeks ago

I'm pretty amazed in how the last 3/4 months have played out....

Duff was very recently talking a shed load about Gun's early days, good watch tbh: http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/duff-m … ays-video/

And the story in this thread is reported on Blabbermouth today, with the addition of:

"In other news, a longtime friend of ex-GUNS N' ROSES bassist Duff McKagan's wife Susan Holmes-McKagan, Brandi Glanville, told a paparazzi reporter during a night out: "GUNS N' ROSES is coming back, motherfuckers!"
Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/report-reunion-tour-of-classic-guns-n-roses-lineup-close-to-being-revealed/#lARGVj02WqwCZK4i.99"

#109 Re: Guns N' Roses » HOLY SHIT!! Get in this thread! » 504 weeks ago

The past weekend, and the hack thread made for an interesting and pretty darn funny read!  From car-wash secrets to gnr boards being more shameful than internet porn. And rather than the polar opposite bitch-fests that used to happen, it seemed like you guys had a right laugh as  shit was going down!  5

#110 Re: Guns N' Roses » GnREvolution Chinese Democracy Elimination 2015 - Round 6 » 509 weeks ago

Still sorry. The lyrics just seemed so lame to me....it was another TIL for me. Pretty depressing, oh woe is me.....bitter

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB