You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#131 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

a really great post from an industry insider at the Velvet Rope on the Hall issue and the name issue......

"right" or "justified" depend entirely on whose ox is being gored. Axl is entirely justified in telling the Hall how he wants to be inducted. and whether the ceremony will include him.

again, his method of doing so may sit not well with others. to a large extent, so what? I respect the guy for not bowing to what others think is "best" - and if no other reason than that many of those same people shit on lesser artists all year long.

so, for once, an artist can tell them to go to hell, do it his way, or leave him alone.
and they cant buckle him.

that's a rarity, and I wish more did it. if for no other reason than that Jann has made that Hall a fucking museum of his own personal preferences, not merit. i mean, one of Axl's biggest musical influences, Alice, has to share the induction date w/ first ballot inductees from RHCP and the Beasties. - a real cornerstone of rock music corralled in with MTV drivel.

(imo, while I might lean closer to Mike D's outlooks on life than the Coop's - as artists, these are not equals.)


Originally Posted By: GoodGodyou surely must also know some of the ridiculous demands Axl has put on everyone who has worked for him, in the legal department or not, dating back to the time they exploded.

fair enough but still, one thing about that. I assure you that one of the smartest things Axl did, was to approach ill-guided acts and was clever enough to talk to bands who WISH they had acted to protect themselves before it was too late. While Slash and Duff and Steve were out doping on tour, Axl solicited insights from his elders, and then used their experiences to shape his own so he didn't go through the meat grinder and come up unprotected.

he also smelled bullshit a thousand miles away and as soon as he could, he bid those sort of people adieu. of course, in doing so, you offend people, and then reputations get besmirched, and the rationality of what one is doing is called into question. you need a thick hide to suffer that, and Axl is equipped with such a hide


Originally Posted By: GoodGodWhy should Axl be so special in this case? Can you name a precedent for this demand at any induction to date?

he is sui generis in many respects, and by not following the herd, he has pissed many off, but he also has maintained a lot of integrity in the sense of, he does he he wants, and you know that going in with him.

this is why you have no difficulty recognizing he is consistent. he does not give a shit about anything other than what works for him. and he would rather fail on his own terms than cave to the machinations of others.

I'd like about 1500 other artists like that to emerge any day now.


Originally Posted By: GoodGodAnd we know there was more than money involved in him getting the name. Every one of them involved has told the story, in books yet, except Izzy, who speaks volumes by saying little or nothing...as well as leaving at the beginning of the "Use Your Illusion" tour.

my take on that is he saw these other guys becoming weak in ways that destroy a band. many precedents for that staring them in the face, and he has and had too much pride to give away his juice, or let others water it down.

so he jumped in to protect himself. and that isn't speculation. that is exactly what he was faced with and how he chose to deal with it.

Tommy Stinson doesn't suffer many fools, and in the right moment, will tell you that Axl did what the Mats wish to have done and wanted to do - be successful enough to be left alone and pursue whatever it is that fancied them, and the day they forgot that, was the last day they had any fun as a band.

that's an important perspective often lost in these musings.


Originally Posted By: GoodGodAnyone who thinks GN'R is entering the R&R Hall of Fame based on Chinese Democracy and the current touring unit is batshit. Or sorely deluded.

that's not the question to me. the question is "has Axl rightfully earned and positioned himself so that he can dictate to others, especially when they have their own ideas of what he should be content to accept?"

my answer is, yep, he has. and that is admirable. because very few ever get there, and those in position to do so, often fail to nail it down when and while they can. then live to regret it later.

Axl brought business books on tour, learned the industry, and fought hard to protect his livelihood.

Very few people realize how involved he was in not getting swindled.

#132 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:
killingvector wrote:

Buzz, the problem is people still believe that Axl used force to get the band to sign over the name. This incident was never brought up at trial. Also, the notion that Axl exploited the band when they were under the influence of illegal substances was also never introduced.

Why? Because as Dexter said, it never happened.

Perceptions need to change about why the name changed hands and realize that it was just a very ignorant decision by Slash and Duff and a shrewd move by Axl.

Posters here throw around, "Axl stole from Slash and Duff" without acknowledging that there is zero evidence that occurred. the law is very specific in this regard and one cannot coerce another to sign away rights, property under the threat of some reactionary force meant to harm them. Basically, those who side with Slash/Duff refuse to give up this fiction.

It doesn't matter if there's evidence.  See my previous post.

By the way, band mates don't pull "shrewed moves" on each other.  Even if he didn't "steal" the name from them, I wouldn't blame anybody for thinking he did by pulling some "shrewed move" on two drug abusers.  Even if it's not illegal, it's a bullshit thing to do.  So you'll have to forgive people if while technically no laws were broken, they don't feel like the name was "stolen" out from under them.  I certainly don't blame Slash and Duff for feeling that way (if they do).

Evidence doesn't matter.

Reality doesn't matter.

I'm sorry but I can't forgive people who are not willing to look at the 'evidence' or lack there of or let go of a fiction because it makes them feel better.

It is pandering and goes against every fiber in my being. It also opens such people up to further exploitation.

#133 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:
killingvector wrote:

Plus a judge ruled on the so-called 'theft'. He tossed out the lawsuit which didn't even claim that Axl stole the  name, only that he allegedly scribbled a resignation note on a napkin back in 94/95. Tossed out. I think some of you are still holding onto the notion that Axl forced the band to sign over the name backstage, 30 seconds before a riot was going to erupt.

Here's the thing you're not thinking about.  It doesn't matter what a judge said.  Sure, from a legal standpoint it does, but that's it.  We all know OJ did it.  Law does not always reflect what happened.  Sometimes people get off on technicalities even though everybody and their mother knows they did it.  Sometimes judges rule for one party even though they know it isn't right because that's how the laws are set up (not saying that happened in this case, just saying it happens).

People don't change how they feel based on a judge's decision.  The judge can rule for Axl until he's blue in the face...if they feel they are right with how they feel, the judge isn't going to change their minds about it.

Buzz, the problem is people still believe that Axl used force to get the band to sign over the name. This incident was never brought up at trial. Also, the notion that Axl exploited the band when they were under the influence of illegal substances was also never introduced.

Why? Because as Dexter said, it never happened.

Perceptions need to change about why the name changed hands and realize that it was just a very ignorant decision by Slash and Duff and a shrewd move by Axl.

Posters here throw around, "Axl stole from Slash and Duff" without acknowledging that there is zero evidence that occurred. the law is very specific in this regard and one cannot coerce another to sign away rights, property under the threat of some reactionary force meant to harm them. Basically, those who side with Slash/Duff refuse to give up this fiction.

#134 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hall of Fame Videos » 688 weeks ago

Please remember that Slash did go to Axl's house to try to sort things out only to be rebuffed and subsequently shit upon in a public message from Axl that was revoked and changed but designed to inflict the most damage on the guy.
That is not an honorable way to live your life.

Slash is not some evil genius, he's just a nice bloke/dodgy junkie who wrote blues guitar.
Axl is not some hugely wronged and tragic individual by the same token. He's a manic obsessive whose talent and paranoia have worked for and against each other with spectacular and pathetic results in equal measure.

It goes both ways. Axl certainly deserves blame in not reaching out to Slash over the years, but the lawsuits, the bad mouthing, the revisionist history has created an immovable ginger grudge.

Slash has demonstrated that he is willing to play for anyone at any time. Often this does not work out well for him, but Axl has always felt the need to feel in control and in a comfortable place to perform. He is not at that place with Slash; it won't ever happen.

#135 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

Axlin12 wrote:

Matt is totally right, and he might've actually said something to Duff about it.


The problem is, and I don't blame them, Slash & Duff feel absolutely NO guilt in what happened with GN'R, and Slash specifically feels no need to call Axl.

The way they both see it is "Axl stole from US". Duff might be playing 'honest' and classy right now, but he's still only gonna crawl so much for Axl. Duff isn't gonna beg Axl to join them at the Hall. And Slash isn't gonna call Axl when he doesn't feel that he was in the wrong, nor is Slash coming from a position of weakness.

Axl isn't gonna budge on Slash needs to call him first. But with Slash out with Myles and The Conspirators, Slash feels no need. Slash will only open up those lines of communication when he feels he has no other gig offering out there, and it's either Axl or picking up a needle and a spoon again. Slash himself says if he doesn't stay busy, he'll use.

I seem to recall Slash visiting Axl's house in the middle of the night.

Plus a judge ruled on the so-called 'theft'. He tossed out the lawsuit which didn't even claim that Axl stole the  name, only that he allegedly scribbled a resignation note on a napkin back in 94/95. Tossed out. I think some of you are still holding onto the notion that Axl forced the band to sign over the name backstage, 30 seconds before a riot was going to erupt.

#136 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hall of Fame Videos » 688 weeks ago

Me_Wise_Magic 91 wrote:
misterID wrote:

I love the new section of SCOM on Big Daddy 99. Very dark, menacing sounding. Wish Sorry could have sounded more like that.

Actually the Live Era SCOM is Axl's AFD redux vocals, as is Nightrain, RQ, YCBM, Mr. Bownstone and a few others. I'm pretty sure Estranged has the 1999 vocals on it.

Yeah I listened to a few of them on Spotify. They sounded really cool! The current band should put out a live album too. That would sound amazing and very tight!

I really love the Big Daddy Sweet Child. Especially post-solo. Axl kills it.

The Ritz though is my all-time favorite version followed by a version Axl did at MSG in 06.

#137 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hall of Fame Videos » 688 weeks ago

gibbo wrote:

I tolds yas when we found out they were playing it was gonna kick arse iv had a great response to the show on my you tube channel Everone thought it was killer and even Myles iv even had a shit load more view on my Myles and slash videos over night it Everone saying they want new gnr slash Steven duff gilby and Myles

Dude, your punctuation and spelling are killing me.

#138 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

-D- wrote:

Label will never release another GNR album unless they can renegotiate that contract

Not true at all. There will be negotiations about production costs paid by Axl for the second disc, perhaps money that fell under the umbrella of Chinese, and negotiations over promotion costs.

But UMG will not renegotiate their record deal b/c there is nothing for either side to gain by doing it: more albums for less label support? who would agree to that?

#139 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

Axl not going was fucked, but in his defence, given his anger at slash, his rebuilding of the new band and his affirmed goal to die before a reunion - he was kind of painted into a corner by other people and has good reason to act like he did from his point of view and his interests.

Thank you.

We officially have common ground.

#140 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

Axlin12 wrote:
killingvector wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

They let them rot for 14 years.

Actually they didn't. They squeezed a GH package out of them to balance their expense sheets, then cut off Axl to force him to piss or get off the pot.

It worked. The record label recouped their cash at the expense of total units sold.

If Axl wants to release another album, the label will not push him away.

Well then you are officially blaming Axl for the lack of current music?


Because according to Axl & the band, it's all the label holding it up.

I have been very critical of Axl for forging ahead with this tour as it visits the same locations for the second, third time with no new music in tow.

He should be focused on getting something out there and running around the world three times.

There will be issues with the label, but there is enough negotiating room on each side to get something done. And no exclusives and no Azoff this time.


btw, this thread has finally teetered over the edge. Some posters must get their G&R history from Wikipedia.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB