You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#131 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
Ali wrote:

I have to say that as someone at the show, the reactions of the group of eight people I was with and all the people around me that I saw who were dancing and cheering, is night and day with the reactions of those on the Internet forums.

Ali

they were just trying to make it fun for the kids

LOL

#132 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
dave-gnfnr wrote:

vocal range has NOTHING to do with singing or how good you sound. Axl cant even sing low anymore as well, his lower register is awful.

Axl doesnt even need his upper register for most of the stuff he played tonight and he was still terrible.

again, i disagreed with you about patience. he was spot on. and even if he wasnt i guarantee that is something that isnt permanent or age related or result of damage. he can still sing at a pro level. just needs to drop the rockstar act. he cant do it any more. doesnt appear to want to.

#133 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
monkeychow wrote:

I agree with that War....I just think the status quo makes it worse.

Like i say...when Vince has a shit night in motley...you can focus on Nikki or Tommy or whatever. People can't do that with GNR.

some can - YOU CAN

i can. we are the exception and i agree with everything you say.

but it's about popularity

look at slash

fergie is terrible but people go to the shows to see slash

same songs as new gnr at times - same terrible vocals at times

yet everybody is praising the band at the slash show and

bitching about axl at the new guns show

#134 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
dave-gnfnr wrote:
war wrote:

dave, steve doesnt have the range that axl does.

also, axl was spot on for patience until the end when it became falsetto time

hes lost his upper range - its that simple

Steven Tyler can sing higher than axl but axl can go lower.
Axls mid range sucks now, while tylers when he was 50 was still very good

i dont agree.

tylers natural range is higher
axls natural range is lower

they are different types of voices

axl used to reach the notes tyler still does and had a larger range

but tyler never could reach the lower notes

age, care, etc are all given as reasons for that but dont make a difference for....

the fact remains axl has lost that upper range

you can say tyler is better in the long run and ur half right

lower degree of difficulty and ability but tyler is better off because he can still sing his own material properly

#135 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
monkeychow wrote:
war wrote:

nope

people are always gonna be there to see that know its axl regardles of aband name and material - hes the only star in the band

Yes....and he's always going to be...if they never release any material written by the other guys...and whilst he calls it GNR and yet is the only person in the band who actually wrote the GNR back catalogue that's famous.

IF Axl is under par for whatever reason, age, illness etc, then the only way to cover that is to put back the other stars, or make the other players into stars.

I'm sorry to be negative. I'm just saying. People ask why the fan base reacts to these things - and I'm just saying - it's because it's billed as GNR - then the only GNR member onstage can't play GNR songs correctly.

Translate that into another economic transaction. Like a dinner out or something and think of how people react.

The fall out would be less if the rest of the band, who always sound great, could stand on their own feet as part of the GNR catalogue...but that doesn't happen because they're only touring musicians.

the only way ur case has an mathematical chance is if new gnr releases an album worthy of catipoulting the band members to stardom. that is nowhere near gonna happen at this stage even if the material was 14 estranged's. and even then axl is the singer, axl is gnr, axl is king dick.

#136 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war

dave, steve doesnt have the range that axl does.

also, axl was spot on for patience until the end when it became falsetto time

hes lost his upper range - its that simple

#137 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
monkeychow wrote:
war wrote:

i don't agree - people are there to see axl. when he sucks they are pissed. 90 percent bitched on the chat bar.  a lot of thoes 90 percent referred to the band and not axl. the band played what people wanted to hear and noone noticed. the was awesome tonight and noone noticed. axl stuck out like a sore thumb.

But that does agree with me.

nope

people are always gonna be there to see axl regardless of the band name and material - hes the only star in the band

if the new band writes a new album and they play that cover to cover live at every show and the band is killing it, the same amount of people notice the band

in fact, you'll also add more to the negativity for the person going to see the classics because its axl rose from gnr

it doesnt have to be over - dont get me wrong.

axl needs to start writing new material and performing current material around his natural voice

#138 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
RussTCB wrote:
war wrote:

russ - its all the same, man

i hear ya

lots of negativity but look at this way

you think its an 8.5 or 7.5 or whatever - on a scale of one to ten
some may say 1 o r 0

we all agree it was towards the bottom compared with other shows

don't we?

No. Because this is Axl Rose at 50. Because others are in denial doesn't make it less of a reality.

well you saying he had an off night
and somone else saying he was terrible are the same thing

we all just package it differently

that's what im saying

we all know hes 50

the fact remains he sounded bad

2006 and 2010 got me stoked

everything since has been worrysome yet the touring is accelerating

and if age is an excuse to not be able to sing these demonic and difficult songs then maybe he should mellow out like other artists do....

move on from the material if you cant sing it - i wouldnt want to sing about shit i did when i was teenager either when im 50.

mellow lyrics, mellow music, natural range, NEW material

#139 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
dave-gnfnr wrote:

What cake? Axl ate the whole thing as you can see by his double chin

LOL

#140 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses, Jack White set for Bridge School Benefit » 661 weeks ago

war
monkeychow wrote:

I haven't seen this yet...just got home...hoping to catch some on youtube.

Although, speaking of the topic in general, I think the reason people see incidents such as RIO11 as disasters is that without a catalogue of their own music to play, the band hangs on the precarious thread of being GNR because they have Axl. So then when Axl's voice doesn't have the qualities that he became famous for (pitch, power, range, rasp etc)...you sort of ask what is left....these things could be averted if the modern band did their own music...as then you'd be watching bumble and DJ kick fucking ass playing unique stuff even if Axl is having a bad day.

i don't agree - people are there to see axl. when he sucks they are pissed. 90 percent bitched on the chat bar.  a lot of thoes 90 percent referred to the band and not axl. the band played what people wanted to hear and noone noticed. the was awesome tonight and noone noticed. axl stuck out like a sore thumb.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB