You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#131 Re: The Sunset Strip » The NINE INCH NAILS Thread » 640 weeks ago
KIller song. looking forward to the album. Trent`s back.
#132 Re: The Sunset Strip » New Pearl Jam coming soon » 640 weeks ago
Son of a Gun wrote:metallex78 wrote:Yeah, Pearl Jam have been consistently bland.
I wouldn't say that about Soundgarden
Consistently bland ? first 4 albums are great and there are some hidden gems on later releases. Soundgarden has what ? Superunknown, Badmotorfinger and King Animal ? Ultramega OK. Louder Than Love and Down on the Upside suck shit.
I'd say first two are great, half of Vitalogy is ok, but yep, they got pretty bland after that, and thats been going about 20 years now.
Granted Soundgarden disappeared for a long time, but they seemed to get better with every album they put out.Down on the Upside is great too, you should give it another spin, especially if you think PJ slaughter Soundgarden...
![]()
![]()
Down on the Upside had few good songs but overall that album was weak Black Hole Sun is painfully lousy song and it was a lead single. As for Pearl Jam, as I said, I like most of their later albums as a band they`re more consistent than Soundgarden.
#133 Re: The Sunset Strip » New Pearl Jam coming soon » 640 weeks ago
Son of a Gun wrote:Off topic, in terms of consistency, Pearl Jam slaughters Soundgarden.
Yeah, Pearl Jam have been consistently bland.
I wouldn't say that about Soundgarden
Consistently bland ? first 4 albums are great and there are some hidden gems on later releases. Soundgarden has what ? Superunknown, Badmotorfinger and King Animal ? Ultramega OK. Louder Than Love and Down on the Upside suck shit.
#134 Re: The Sunset Strip » New Pearl Jam coming soon » 640 weeks ago
Off topic, in terms of consistency, Pearl Jam slaughters Soundgarden.
#135 Re: The Sunset Strip » STONE TEMPLE PILOTS return with CHESTER BENNINGTON as their FRONTMAN! » 640 weeks ago
I bet Scott wishes he had pulled an Axl and had acquired band`s franchise.
#136 Re: The Sunset Strip » Megadeth's Super Collider New Album » 640 weeks ago
Still waiting to hear it - got a signed CD coming in the mail as part of renewing my online club membership so holding out for that to arrive.
How would you compare it to Endgame or Th1rt3en son of a gun? Did you also dislike those or is this better/worse etc?
The Last Megadeth album I really enjoyed from start to finish was Youthanasia, their strongest effort since Rust In Peace. Super Colider is definetely their weakest album by far even Cryptic Writings is much stronger record. Risk, The World Needs a Hero, The System Has Failed, United Abominations, Endgame and Thirteen are all decent albums with some very good songs buried amongst tons of filler fluff.
#137 Re: The Sunset Strip » STONE TEMPLE PILOTS return with CHESTER BENNINGTON as their FRONTMAN! » 640 weeks ago
Son of a Gun wrote:metallex78 wrote:Upset much dude...?
![]()
![]()
![]()
If Axl can get by using the GN'R name and being the only original member, I think STP with 3 original members have every right to use their name as well.
They don`t. Scott is a founding member not these pricks. Slash is ok with them carrying on without original vocalist ? he`s a hypocrite to say the least.
This is obviously very close and personal in nature to Slash, and I completely see how it would appear hypocritical. And honestly, it is. BUT, I think the fact that it's Scott has everything to do with it. He obviously had his trials and tribulations with him in VR and has said he'll never work professionally with him again (in a band setting). He obviously doesn't think too highly of him, so I think that's why he doesn't feel much remorse for Scott and supports STP going forward. I doubt he'd feel the same if Metallica decided to get rid of Hetfield and replace him with Jonathan Davis.
He`s a still hypocrite in my book he does n`t have to work with him if he does n`t want but he should n`t have endorsed STP without Scott. Duff is whatever.....
#138 Re: The Sunset Strip » Megadeth's Super Collider New Album » 640 weeks ago
This album is shit, load of uninspired, generic, rehashed half assed Thrash riffs. Dave is long overdue his creative years.
#139 Re: Guns N' Roses » House of Blues Houston, TX - May 28th 2013 » 640 weeks ago
Son of a Gun wrote:buzzsaw wrote:That's a pipe dream. There's no way in the world that freak show from 2002 was ever going to be accepted as GnR. That was over as soon as the VMAs happened.
2002 band was amazing they take massive shit on current incamation.
And that's fine if musically that's your opinion.
In reality the current fans have this revisionist history thinking the 2002 band was gonna save the world.
I remember the day after the VMA's, and GN'R were the talk of the radio & TV.
NONE
N-O-N-E
Of it was good. They were slammed unmercifully, Axl was called fat & washed up. He was compared to being a lost Kid Rock knock off (which is a HUGE slam). Everyone wanted to know where Guns N' Roses were. Eyewitnesses at the show were saying how the audience seemed confused, expecting to see Slash & Izzy & Duff, and didn't recognize anyone, Axl included. Most slammed his voice as shit, the new song in the medley ("Madagascar") was slammed as a piece of shit, and so on and so on.
There's a reason when in 2006 when John Norris asked him about that performance, Axl described it in one word -- "castastrophe".
That singular appearence, with that band, that circus, buried Axl's reboot dream for Guns N' Roses in a mere 9 minutes. Even Axl knew it.
Axl sorely under-estimated image. Regardless of Slash. If the current band had been the ones there instead, playing an "If I Die Tomorrow" song, it might've been a different story. But all of that is could've, would've, should've.
In reality with Axl's voice in the condition it was in 2002... Axl should've been nowhere but at his house. NO ONE was ever prepared to accept Mickey Mouse-Axl as Axl Rose. 2006 was the moment.
I never thought that 02 band could save the world WTF ? but they sure as hell were zillion times better than current glorified, touring machine and they had chance to pull off decent success with regular releases. Like I said many times, two lead guitarists don`t work in GNR there was no place for Robin finck in that band when you have guitarist like Buckethead , you don`t bring another lead player in. I still can`t figure out what the hell Pitman`s job is. Axl should have condensed 02 band to six member lineup and dropped Chinese Democracy somewhere around that same year. Yes, MTV performance sucked but there were other great and critically acclaimed shows from that period. I find obssession over looks and image idiotic to be honest, who gives a fuck how musicians look, they can look like cyclopes all I care, as long as they deliever music but unfortunately that was n`t the case with " New Guns N`Roses ". If 02 band was a freak show then, what do you have Now ? a glorifed, touring, jukebox nostalgia act with no sign of progress, a punchline ? " lead guitarist " who`s a complete Slash knock off and can t even cover his parts properly ? that was n`t the case with 2002 band back then, Axl cared now, he does n`t give two shits about anything except fronting a cover band and wasting his talent and potential.
#140 Re: Guns N' Roses » House of Blues Houston, TX - May 28th 2013 » 640 weeks ago
That's a pipe dream. There's no way in the world that freak show from 2002 was ever going to be accepted as GnR. That was over as soon as the VMAs happened.
2002 band was amazing they take massive shit on current incamation.