You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#141 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 158 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

Hidden Text:

Fuck this movie. Like the Disney Star Wars sequels – the first one in particular – it's like a Greatest Hits compilation of bits you liked from the previous films (Indiana Jones punches Nazis on a moving vehicle! Crumbling ruins with puzzles and booby traps!) while adding in backstory that utterly undermines the happy ending of the previous film and reframes every moment of the preceding films as part of a tragic arc.

I honestly didn’t feel that way at all. While it wasn’t without its faults and flaws, I still thoroughly enjoyed it.

Hidden Text:

At the end of the film, Indiana Jones is a tragic figure, consoling his grieving wife and mourning his son's early death. That's our last glimpse of the character; not riding into the sunset, triumphant. Not reuniting with and marrying his sweetheart, and throwing a cheeky smirk as he takes his hat back from his son. No, he's an old man broken by grief. What an uplifting fucking ending to the entire saga. Oh, and try watching, say, Raiders again with that foreknowledge. The ending of Raiders – Indy and Marion trotting down the steps to a then-uncertain future, is no longer a hopeful, optimistic moment; it's now leading them inexorably towards tragedy.

Fuck this film.

#142 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 158 weeks ago

ClaudeF wrote:

He should run around less to preserve his lung capacity. Same trap Mick Jagger got onto around 1981. Everyone saw him sprinting across the stage in that concert that aired on cable TV (on HBO, I think?) and expected it of him, whereas in the ‘60s and ‘70s he tended to stand at the microphone.

There was a noticeable improvement in his vocals in London, IMO – where the stage was wet and slippery, so he couldn't run around as much.

#143 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 158 weeks ago

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

Hidden Text:

Fuck this movie. Like the Disney Star Wars sequels – the first one in particular – it's like a Greatest Hits compilation of bits you liked from the previous films (Indiana Jones punches Nazis on a moving vehicle! Crumbling ruins with puzzles and booby traps!) while adding in backstory that utterly undermines the happy ending of the previous film and reframes every moment of the preceding films as part of a tragic arc.

#144 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2023 Tour Dates » 159 weeks ago

Scabbie wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:
Scabbie wrote:

Glastonbury is a total lottery when it comes to tickets. People won't know who the headliner will be when they 'apply' for tickets.
So I think a new song will have less impact at Glastonbury. As will 'deep cuts' such as COMA
They will have to bring their a-game though, if Axl can do rasp this is the time to turn it on. Also limit covers outside of LALD and KOHD.

Save the new song for Hyde Park, which selfishly I will get to enjoy with a beer in my hand in the gold circle!

lol, I'll see you there...

If you see some one in a UYI2 t-shirt, mid 40s grey/mouse brown hair, that's me. Enjoy the day!

Enjoy!

Mate you just described like 60% of the audience for the show

#146 Re: Guns N' Roses » Which song gets released first?!? » 159 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

I hope the working dynamic allows slash to really re-jig the songs but I suspect its more like they just mute the existing solos and he improvises a solo where there was one.

I dunno, I think they pretty radically altered Hard Skool. All the meandering intro (an Axl signature – see Riad, Chinese Democracy etc) was stripped out. You can just picture Duff going, "lose all that shite, bass riff, couple of drum hits and straight into the song."

#147 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 159 weeks ago

jimmythegent wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

GUNS N' ROSES: 'Worst Glastonbury Headline Set Of All Time'?
U.K.'s Independent calls GUNS N' ROSES' performance at Glastonbury "the worst Glastonbury headline set of all time" and refers to singer Axl Rose as the band's "fatal flaw." The reviewer, Mark Beaumont, writes: "Rose makes the whole thing sound like a Muppet Show pastiche of hard rock. It's his voice: a creature that, were you to take it to a vet, would come home in a cardboard box."

https://blabbermouth.net/news/watch-dav … B6DzTL5eqo

I'm still gonna see them on August 18th, but the author isn't wrong and anyone who's watched the band since 2016 knows this to be true. Slither beyond every other song needs to be dropped.  He can't sing it.  It sounds bad, and there are other songs he can do.

My god that review is brutal but hilarious in a way only the British press can be

The writer is ex-NME, so it tracks. It's staffed by insecure indie kids who can't bear seeing someone enjoy music they don't like. They're incapable of celebrating music; they only know how to draw up dividing lines between in-groups and out-groups, and sit there in their little adolescent clique sneering at the designated pariahs.

I danced a fucking jig when the last issue of that rag was printed.

#148 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 159 weeks ago

James wrote:

I'm 10000% against this.

Unfortunately....it's probably going to happen because many bands/artists do it now. Hell .... even Roger Waters lip syncs some of the songs.

I remain convinced that in 2-3 years, AI will have got to the point where an AI model trained on a performer's younger voice can be overlaid on their current vocals as an effect in real-time, at a quality where the audience will be none the wiser. The experiments we've seen on YouTube are almost convincing, and that's people working with scrappy vocals using off the shelf tools. With an AI model trained on the hundreds of hours of isolated vocal tracks from live and studio recordings that bands have access to, it should be a *lot* easier.

And since it'll be applied as an effect to the performer's actual voice, it won't have those odd moments where you think, "That sounds like Axl in places, but it's clearly being sung with the cadences and the vocal tics that Scott Weiland/Andrew Stockdale/Myles Kennedy use."

It'll be a new lease of life for a lot of performers.

#149 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 159 weeks ago

James wrote:

Ditch certain songs....

Slither

Again – the Classic Rock Magazine review points out that Slither was the first song where people started signing along to it (I actually noticed it myself, watching the BBC coverage, because it stood out to me – "the Glastonbury crowd is singing along to a Velvet Revolver track from 2004?"). Personally I'm not a fan of Axl's rendition of the song – he consistently sings "That's the spot/where you run to me" with the wrong emphasis, and he sings a high melody in the chorus. Which is surprising since you'd think Scott's material would lend itself to his much stronger lower register. But it undeniably clicked with that audience.

YCBM needs to go. Acoustic mini-set with Used to Love Her, Patience and You're Crazy would be neat – they're definitely within his lower-register wheelhouse (the first two especially, because if Weiland could sing them with his lower-register voice, Axl surely can).

#150 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 159 weeks ago

Randall Flagg wrote:

GUNS N' ROSES: 'Worst Glastonbury Headline Set Of All Time'?
U.K.'s Independent calls GUNS N' ROSES' performance at Glastonbury "the worst Glastonbury headline set of all time" and refers to singer Axl Rose as the band's "fatal flaw." The reviewer, Mark Beaumont, writes: "Rose makes the whole thing sound like a Muppet Show pastiche of hard rock. It's his voice: a creature that, were you to take it to a vet, would come home in a cardboard box."

https://blabbermouth.net/news/watch-dav … B6DzTL5eqo

I'm still gonna see them on August 18th, but the author isn't wrong and anyone who's watched the band since 2016 knows this to be true. Slither beyond every other song needs to be dropped.  He can't sing it.  It sounds bad, and there are other songs he can do.

Most of the coverage has been much more even-handed. Indeed, I've seen a lot of pushback against the Independent's review on the r/unitedkingdom subreddit (the very definition of a general audience):

4-stars from the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/ … amid-stage

BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66011512

3-stars from the NME, of all people:
https://www.nme.com/reviews/live/guns-n … st-3460919

4-stars from Classic Rock Magazine (which points out that the "first major singalong of the evening" was Slither):
https://www.loudersound.com/reviews/gun … ury-review

4-stars from the Evening Standard:
https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/musi … 90021.html

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB