You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#151 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 86 weeks ago

monsterscantkillme wrote:
dave-gnfnr wrote:

what if the digital dropped tonight lol

then the debate on who played what on The General would be over. Then we would know if it is a duplicate of the demo or something different.

I still dont think Monsters will be on the record, just the General.

#152 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 86 weeks ago

what if the digital dropped tonight lol

#153 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 86 weeks ago

https://streamable.com/w7sxzx

sounds similar but you can really only make out the orchstration

#155 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 86 weeks ago

Bill Brasky wrote:
dave-gnfnr wrote:
Bill Brasky wrote:

Yet you're not grasping it.
Dark saying he's heard unreleased stuff to axl s privately and changing it to publicly that maybe he did is a difference.
Let's not continue to go back and forth shitting up this thread.

I am grapsing it just fine, its you who isn't. Also this is what Axl S is claiming Dark said, Dark has clarified what he said, yet you are still talkign Axl S word for it which is just weird.

Did you ever think for a second that Axl S misrembers what Dark actually said?

Axl s has better track record then dark does in my interactions with them.

I've said my peace.  You can continue defending Dark all you want.

LMAO no he doesn't. Thanks for the good laugh though, that was a good one.

#158 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rank the Post CD Songs » 86 weeks ago

I have a psych degree so things like this always interest me lol

#159 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rank the Post CD Songs » 86 weeks ago

monsterscantkillme wrote:
dave-gnfnr wrote:
monsterscantkillme wrote:

Yeah. Monsters can't kill me in a row the first time. and then it's Monsters in hell with me followed by some more monsters can't kill me in a row for the second time. and the third time is the same as the second except at the end of it he says monsters can't... and then the screaming verse kicks in and then the puzzling solo to end the song still puzzling me lol

or is just our minds playing tricks on us based on what we heard first
like this

https://youtu.be/8EPLG0ihdcs?si=X2ecOWJ88cw7euDy

I don't know what that video is about, but I told you honestly what I heard.

What do you mean you dont understand the video?

The video is showing that what we hear is influenced on what we see.
So axl could be saying the same thing in each line but we hear different things bc of what we see. And it can even switch when you keep hearing the same thing over and over again.

I am not saying who is right and who is wrong.  I was just pointing out why you can hear different things even if Axl is saying teh same thing over and over again lol

#160 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 86 weeks ago

Bill Brasky wrote:
dave-gnfnr wrote:
Bill Brasky wrote:

So saying in a private group that you have heard unreleased songs then denying it publicly by putting caveats on your prior statements is what liars do.

I don't understand your confusion.

Someone can claim oh this is a new GNR song, and play it over the phone. You do know it could be a fake right? And if it cant be verify it's not a lie to saying you dont KNOW if anything is out there. 

Not sure why you are confused on this. There is a huge difference between KNOWING something for sure and someone claiming oh this is new GNR.

How many fakes of GNR stuff is out there, a lot.

for example, look at that clip of Closing it on you.
If I called Dark and said oh here is a unreleased GNR song,  no one KNOWs if that song is legit or if its a fake, but just because I played it for him claiming its GNR, that doesnt mean he KNOWS there are leakes out there bc he is not sure if what I played him is legit or not.


so to recap, just because someone claimed to play him unreleased GNR songs that does not mean someone KNOWS there are legit other songs out there.

Its not that confusing.

Yet you're not grasping it.
Dark saying he's heard unreleased stuff to axl s privately and changing it to publicly that maybe he did is a difference.
Let's not continue to go back and forth shitting up this thread.

I am grapsing it just fine, its you who isn't. Also this is what Axl S is claiming Dark said, Dark has clarified what he said, yet you are still talkign Axl S word for it which is just weird.

Did you ever think for a second that Axl S misrembers what Dark actually said?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB