You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#171 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash and Axl friends again? » 513 weeks ago

Will wrote:
misterID wrote:

I wouldn't count on a reunion. More like Slash playing with Axl. They both have albums to release in the near future. And MSL and Jim called this a long time ago that everyone is leaching now.

Can you provide a link where either MSL or Jim specifically stated that Axl and Slash were communicating again? Don't recall ever seeing this. The hints were there for everybody to see looking back now, so I don't understand why them 'calling this' a long time ago was never noticed by the rest of the internet smile

The major hint that Jim dropped publicaly was saying "hell had frozen over". This was about a year ago. I don't think he ever explicitly said Axl and Slash had patched things up, but I remember catching on to what he was implying at the time. Recently, a few folks are admitting that Jim told them privately.

I think it's legit. The most telling thing for me - Jim has always been very team Axl, and about a year ago, he started being pro-Slash as well.

#172 Re: Guns N' Roses » New song for trade (FAKE) » 522 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:

Sounds like 80's Zakk Wylde with 80's Axl on top, Most definitely doesn't sound like Axl CD era 1999, 2002 or 2008.

Maybe it is from the 1996 period, but Axl's vocals don't sound like from then. Sounds like Shadow of Your Love style.

Anyway, I'm calling this out as fake until we hear otherwise.


That's to badass to be fake bro, lol.  I've always wanted to hear the 96 demos, I'm a fan of Zakk's.

#173 Re: Guns N' Roses » Stay of Execution » 525 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

I MAY have had too many beers last night!!!!! 16

Ain't nothin wrong with that!

#174 Re: Guns N' Roses » Stay of Execution » 527 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Actually, from people who seem to know, the new album is on the horizon, possibly the end of the year and has nothing to do, so far, with any former member potentially returning.

Plz let this be so!

#175 Re: The Garden » Hey, so, what's new? » 611 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
RaZor wrote:

so this BS about Russ giving ultimatums needs to stop.

He did, just not in public.

Oh please.

The facts, as I laid them out on my previous post, played out on 4 very lengthy, very public threads. If an ultimatum was given in private, than it very much contradicts what was said publicly.

If Russ gave an ultimatum, than what were all those threads? A ruse? Give me a break. I hope there is no one reading this that buys that bullshit. And shame on everyone bad mouthing someone who's no longer here to defend himself.

#176 Re: The Garden » Hey, so, what's new? » 612 weeks ago

I second Will, losing Russ was a massive blow to this place. It hasn't been the same since he's left.

Also, in regards to the whole ultimatum thing, I've read every post in this whole drama, and never once did I see Russ give anyone an ultimatum. Russ was fed up with Bono's shit and was going to leave the board. The rest of the mods agreed to ban Bono to keep Russ here, not because Russ gave them an ultimatum, but because they chose too. Whatever their reasons, they didn't want Russ to leave and they offered up Bono to get him to stay. Several of the mods have collaborated this, as did Bono when he hacked into the chat a couple months ago, so this BS about Russ giving ultimatums needs to stop.

#177 Re: Guns N' Roses » Welcome back » 612 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
RaZor wrote:

Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home. smile  Great to have this place back!

For whatever reason, I can't seem to be able to message you on this new site

But feel free to add me 
https://www.facebook.com/alexsilady

Friend request sent. Thx.

#178 Re: The Garden » Hey, so, what's new? » 612 weeks ago

Lol, holy shit.

For the record, I would love for both Russ and Bono to come back. If they were able to coexist at MyGNR, why not here again? Seems there's some hard feelings here about Russ, and honestly I was peeved by the way he left too, but I've always liked Russ, so I can forgive and forget.

Bono - have you tried reaching out to Will offline. An apology can go a long way, maybe you two can work something out.

#179 Re: Guns N' Roses » Welcome back » 612 weeks ago

Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home. smile  Great to have this place back!

#180 Re: The Garden » 9-11 Reflection » 615 weeks ago

Axlin12 wrote:
RaZor wrote:

You sound like you have a serious chip on your shoulder JR. I hope this isn't because you've bought into some 9/11 fault flag conspiracy.


My official statement on the subject is...


I don't know


I do not by the government's official story. Missing reports, missing evidence, missing eyewitness testimony, and I could go on. I remember stuff on the day of, even as a high school kid that just didn't add up. "We pulled WTC 7" -- what? United 93 having like no wreckage that it should have.

I swallowed it all, fully supported Bush, continued to support him and the war on terror throughout his entire presidency, and including initially into Obama's presidency. But there was always that eating, nagging thing, like a cancer, that was there going, "Axlin you're an objective thinker. You're smarter than this. Since when do you believe in the accepted consciousness?"


I'm just saying there's A-LOT of unanswered questions. This isn't Pearl Harbor. It also doesn't help how much expansion of the military industrial complex that has occured since then.

You'd have to be asleep to not smell a little stink off of it. Even if the official story is skewed because America didn't want to look like it had it's pants down, I certaintly don't buy the official story anymore.

Not to mention TSA checks, the militarization of our police, the FEMA camps during Katrina... alot of stuff changed after that day. In favor of the U.S. government. They were the biggest benefactors of 9/11 of anyone.


Just sayin', that's all.

I don't think 9-11 was a false flag, though I was almost reeled into that conspiracy a few years ago.  Back when I was looking into it, the big thing among to conspiracy theorists was the way the buildings came down, that it was a controlled demolition.  Those theories were debunked, by popular science, the same article also went into explaining why they fell the way they fell.  Another reason I don't think it was a false flag is because Bin Laden and Al-Q wasn't a fabricated threat that came out of nowhere, they have been a thorn in the US's side for over a decade before that attack.  They were behind the '93 attack on the WTC, the bombing of the US Cole, as well as bombings to US embassies.

The thing with conspiracy theories is they sucker you in with a lot of real historical events and facts, so much so that's its often hard to spot where they are jumping to baseless conclusions. What makes it worse is, when their jumping to those conclusions, their logic seems so good that it's easy to give them the benefit of the doubt.  But at the end of the day, they've got no real poof of these things, and what's worse, they often ignore more logical / plausible explanations.  They're like that crazy hair guy from the discovery channel that thinks everything is proof of aliens.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB