You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#171 Re: Guns N' Roses » Who here is going to Coachella? » 494 weeks ago
As a rock fan, Coachella doesn't look appealing at all. I think I'll wait for their own tour to be announced, hopefully with some Australian dates in there
Im guessing if they get down here there would probably only be Sydney and Melbourne dates which I would definitely fly over for!
#172 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 494 weeks ago
Good to see a lot of old names back. We are all suckers for punishment with this band.
#173 Re: Guns N' Roses » The thingamabob Axl needs to break out? » 494 weeks ago
It looks like some sex toy / F&@king machine. lol
#174 Re: Guns N' Roses » Official Statement coming from Guns camp tonight. » 494 weeks ago
Oh goodie we have an announcement about an announcement.
#175 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 494 weeks ago
There is no other band that is harder to be a fan of than GNR. Thank God AC/DC and the Rolling Stones are my other 2 favorite bands...
I completely agree with this!!! They are a fucken joke.
At least now Duff might get an appreciation for what their past management have had to go thru. He is apparently "manager" of this clusterfuck if it goes ahead - well along with The Brazilians for Axl. lol Good luck mate you're gonna need it!
#176 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 494 weeks ago
I saw it posted on HTGTH that he was online.
According to a poster on HTGTH he (or someone) logged in there under his Dexter account and was showing up under the list of members "online". He has now left without posting anything.
#177 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 494 weeks ago
Axl is apparently online right now at mygnr with his Dexter account. Good luck getting on tho the site keeps crashing.
#178 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses-Velvet Revolver hybrid? » 494 weeks ago
I don't think Dave is going to be involved. That would be... Meh.
I think he will be but shouldn't. Same with Frank and Fortus.
This is going to be a reunion lite version and will probably be the death of Adler if he doesn't have some involvement. Hopefully Izzy decides he wants to do some dates and would no doubt walk in should he wish to.
#179 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!* » 495 weeks ago
polluxlm wrote:What I want to know is, if familiar characters, CGI and lightsabers are enough to make a great Star Wars movie, then why is the PT so disliked? Whatever it was it certainly had all of those elements.
Is it the few lines of cringe dialogue and acting tipping the scale?There's more to the formula than CGI and lightsabre battles and Han Solo, but yeah, dialogue and acting are big problems in the PT. It spoils the moments that could be great. When the Vader mask is put on and we hear that classic breathing sound for the first time, it's awesome. But then a minute later he's yelling "NOOOOOOOO!" and I'm laughing. There's tension when Anakin and Obi-Wan confront each other, then Anakin says "Either you're with me, or you're my enemy" and I'm laughing because it sounds so awkward. Same when Anakin confesses his love to Padme on Naboo or when he tells her about killing the sand people. These should be big moments and none of them land for me. In particular, those two are so not in love it's jarring. I could've gotten into their non-chemistry if they led us to think that Padme was only with him to keep an eye on him, but they didn't really go that direction, at least not clearly enough for me to pick up on.
So yeah, the dialogue in the PT is cringe-worthy in key moments and the acting is often bad. I'd say the acting in Force Awakens is strong throughout.
But also I just didn't find the characters of the PT very likable or their motivations easy to understand. Like I said, Padme's love for Anakin never makes sense. And what was the point of Darth Maul or Qui-Gon Jinn? And am I supposed to hate Anakin or sympathize with him? (At times it seems he's pulled to the Dark Side because he's impatient with his place with the Jedi, other times he really seems to think it's the only way to save the woman he loves). Maybe the acting was bad because the characters were confusing.
Force Awakens very quickly shows you who these people are and why you should care about them. Even with Ren, they introduce the nuances of his character by first giving us clear signals about what he is, then violating our expectations about him. I thought it was well done.
But that's just my opinion. I forgive a cheesy plot easier than I forgive bad characters or dialogue, so VII was more my cup of tea than I-II-III.
EDIT: Sorry this turned out so long.
^ That sums up pretty well a lot of my feelings with those first 3 movies.
Polluxlm - are they really having a different director for the next movie? That's crazy particularly when this one was so successful, plus I would think it could also make the movies somewhat disjointed??
Darth Emo - we have him now Kylo Ren/Marilyn Manson. I agree wth what you say Polluxlm that having him with a disfigured face or something would be a rip off of Vader, but to have some androgynous looking school boy face just didn't seem right. I probably could have tolerated it if he only took his mask off once but it felt like he was taking it off every other second so reduced the impact of the character and his supposed dark side/evilness. It's a bit like Anakin in the PT even when he was turning bad he just didn't look right to me (maybe it was the casting or the script - or both), he was just not believable.
That said all these things with the new movie were minor to me, I really enjoyed it and give JJ a big tick of approval for his efforts.
#180 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Star Wars Thread *NO SPOILERS ALLOWED!* » 496 weeks ago
I really enjoyed the movie. The first half of the movie I thought was particularly well done, then the story went a little light/weak, but overall I thought it was great.