You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#171 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot not happy? Speculating.... » 670 weeks ago

war

axl didn't print the booklet so it's not his mistake in that capacity
but we all know how axl is
he probably wasn't cooperating before the release any more than he was after

i don't remember who it was but they basically said that axl still wasn't ready to let the album out when it did finally happen

that's why they leaked the damn thing

music was done as well, not sure what we would've got had xl been ready and cooperated but im guessing it would have been a slightly different tracklist but no less overproduced.

unless it came out years prior

when you sit on songs that long you get bored with them and then you obsess and tinker - that's what happened

#172 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot not happy? Speculating.... » 672 weeks ago

war

cd's failure was the result of a perfect storm

the most significant factors as i see them in chronological order of appearance

the ideals of a fan base grown up

gnr lost a lot of it's once devoted followers when it reformed without any original members after word got out, true or not, that axl was to blame for the break-up. like dominoes many more dropped along the way due to the lack of activity, little to no communication with fans, and an overall dysfunction as a band.

kids today

kids spend more money on music than anyone else and cd, whether you like it or not, wasn't going to appeal to the masses in a time when radio was dominated by britney spears.

a Hardcore reality for the music and it's fans

although gnr's best cd ever wouldn't have made a huge difference to the masses in 2008, a cd with 14 twats would've been unanimously proclaimed as brilliant by the hardcores. after 14 years we got 1 twat and no tour and few of us were screaming from the mountain tops about that. the power of a happy fan base to change a few minds cannot be overlooked.

a struggling best buy's exclusive and a free stream for the curious yielded the punch line

after several failed attempts to be released before finally finding it's day, cd had become a joke and gnr was completely irrelevant to modern music. most of what was left of the curious gave but a short peak at cd for free on myspace rather than paying for it in a store they probably never entered. nobody, seriously considering buying it, would listen only to the first two songs with the rest at their finger tips (all for free) and then decide not to buy it based on those two songs and curiosity does not always equal intent to invest. axe the free stream and do a wal mart exclusive and cd then becomes a possible impulse buy for millions more with differing levels of curiosity and no way to know for sure other than to buy.

the curiosity factor did very little for cd's sales in the end

because

gnr chose the deal that offered money in the bank rather than the one geared towards marketing their product 

and that is in consistency with the direction the band has taken since

#173 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot not happy? Speculating.... » 674 weeks ago

war
Naltav wrote:
misterID wrote:

Axl rants and makes shit public all the time, including slamming people with absoulte contempt and anger, including (at the time) current band members in the past, making private issues public. I don't see a difference.

There is no difference.

the difference is there is nobody that can fire axl for doing it. wink

#174 Re: Guns N' Roses » Change that robe, Axl » 674 weeks ago

war

blaming genes is something fat people do. but i agree with dck's general sentiment. stress is harsh and we don't know for sure what, how much and why. i will say that if he wanted to be in better shape he could be and therefore probably doesn't really care. if he ever gives it another run - album/tour i'd be willing to put money on him trimming down for performance and endurance reasons alone and id expect a different look as well.

#175 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tour or album » 674 weeks ago

war

i can't believe what i'm reading, D

#176 Re: Management » Insults Will NOT Be Tolerated (Please Read) » 677 weeks ago

war

is the chat room an option?

people that want to get it on could go there and it would get taken care of more quickly than by posts or messages.

might be kind of fun too.

if not, yes, let's jsut be mature here and respectful.

#177 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR’s and SLASH’s performance of Paradise City in HELLFEST, France » 678 weeks ago

war
Bono wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

I think a lot of people going to see him now have different standards and expectations too.  Sounding great compared to what?  The album?  Not a chance.  Other 50 year old singers?  Okay.  What he used to sound like?  Depends on the day.

And the time of day and which song. Axl is more hit and miss now than ever and it shows within each song

i actually think he's more consistent these days

less power obviously but he is taking better care of his voice, atleast it appears he is to me

#178 Re: Guns N' Roses » Gods of Metal June 22nd » 678 weeks ago

war
Bono wrote:
war wrote:

i miss the good old days when threads were empty and i didn't have to weed through childish bullshit to see if there was any news each day.

Such an odd comment to make in THIS thread seeing as though there's been aboslutely no childish bullshit in here neutral

i wasn't referring to childish behavior and it was my bad that i said that

more or less the excess of crap to talk about

#179 Re: Guns N' Roses » Gods of Metal June 22nd » 678 weeks ago

war

i miss the good old days when threads were empty and i didn't have to weed through childish bullshit to see if there was any news each day.

#180 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR’s and SLASH’s performance of Paradise City in HELLFEST, France » 678 weeks ago

war

who cares who likes what or who thinks what is better.
you guys sound like my kids.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB