JR - You don't believe Assad, a well documented scumbag, used chemical weapons on his own people, because you haven't seen the proof. But you want US troops to lose and die because you think there is a globalist conspiracy of international bankers that secretly run the federal reserve and our military, because why? You have an orgy of evidence to prove that without a shadow of a doubt?  I doubt that. Because I was obsessed with that conspiracy myself for a couple of years, and the arguments were strong enough for me to fall through that rabbit hole and do some hardcore research. Know what I found? Bullshit. A whole lot of historical fact to sucker you in, tied together with speculation that isn't backed up with proof.

Further, they have given us proof that chemical weapons were used. Both the US and French governments analyses hair and clothing samples from the victims and confirmed the chemicals used. The proof that hasn't been shown to us yet is the proof that Assad did it. But as I pointed out in an earlier post, it's very unlikely anyone but his regime would have been able to do it.

From a knowledgable friend:

"I have little to no doubt that the Assad regime did the chemical attacks. I dont really see the theories that Al-Q "rebels" did it, to try to blame the regime, and bring action favorable to them, as terribly realistic. For one, Assad has the weapons, controls them-with help from Soviet "advisors". Second, they really do lack the technical skills, and logistical safegaurding skills to move Sarin around without some dufus fucking up and accidently taking themselves out somewhere along the way.
Third, if Al-Q had obtained Sarin or other binary nerve agents, Im pretty sure they would'nt have wasted it on attacks in Syria. They'd likely have gone for the big PR blitz they'd get out of setting off a canister or two in Times Square, at rush-hour. If they did choose to use it in an internal conflict, Im thinking they'd prefer Pakistan or even Saudi for regime targets. "