You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#241 Re: Guns N' Roses » US Tour Cities » 482 weeks ago
I was driving from the San Francisco in the direction of Oakland yesterday and saw a billboard right after the Bay bridge that simply said "Welcome to the Jungle" followed by the Gn'F'nR's logo. No indication of a venue or anything, just that small teaser. I have to say, it's very surreal to see GNR advertising with these old style graphics, I'm getting all sorts of warm and fuzzy feelings inside...
#242 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tools for Fools (RAR '06) » 482 weeks ago
Madagascar is one of the best tracks in the discography.
I really disagree, I find it boring and uninspired. It doesn't grab me at all...
But in all fairness, I don't like CITR, TWAT or Street of Dreams either, so perhaps I'm just not the target audience of these songs.
#243 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 483 weeks ago
This is a terrible idea, considering their election coverage every primary is Jimmy Dore shouting at the screen and ranting incoherently for 10 minutes about how everyone voted for Sanders and the main stream media is lying about Hillary winning primaries.
I enjoy me some TYT now and then. Sure, what you said is true enough, but I'd still like to see them do one. Can't be worse than some of the mainstream media stuff, and it'd be interesting to see someone else's take on it.
#244 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hitchhiking to Paradise City » 483 weeks ago
Lot's of cynics here... guess that's to be expected on a GNR fan forum .
Good luck man, I hope you do get to meet them!
#245 Re: Guns N' Roses » What's your dream song inclusion for these shows? » 483 weeks ago
Imo they are back in the band because they want it, and it is completely on Axl's terms.
Nah, Pitman wouldn't have to keep his trap shut if that were the case. I think SG is right in that this is a return to 'the partnership'.
#246 Re: The Garden » Terrorist attacks in Brussels » 483 weeks ago
Why haven't the Mexicans turn to terrorism when they are not fully assimilated in the US? Maybe because they are not radicals Muslims....
Or because Catholics aren't villainized as much as Muslims?
Forgot that, obviously it's tied to their religion, I AGREE. We're just asking two different questions: you're thinking 'ah, evil muslims, must keep them out'. I'm thinking 'ah, indoctrinated people, how can we bring them into the modern world'. I think the second question is harder to answer, but a much better way to achieve a more peaceful world.
#247 Re: The Garden » Terrorist attacks in Brussels » 483 weeks ago
By the way, I want to make one thing clear: I actually agree with what most right-winger are saying: the problem is their religion. I vehemently blame religion! Not just Islam though, but the very concept of people buying into the idea of a god that 'works in mysterious ways', that cannot be explained, that defies critical thinking. If you're willing to buy into the idea that the afterlife can be a wonderful place but you'll only get there if you please your god, that your god says that anyone who doesn't believe is an infidel that needs to be converted, that your religion classifies people of other religions or non-religious people as lesser people, etc... it's easy to see how they can be convinced that what they are doing is a good thing.
The point is, that line of arguing will bring us nowhere, whether it comes from a devout Christian like Cruz, or a staunch atheist like myself. People believe these things, and arguing with them, talking down to them or villainizing them doesn't solve anything. You can't convince someone who has been brought up to uncritically believe these things that they've been wrong for their entire lives. The only course of action that I can think of is to keep including everyone in the conversation, bring them into our modern society and let them find out for themselves. Religion will keep fading away if we keep developing our welfare states, including Islam, but if you single out one religion you will get them to retreat in their shells and bond together, you will make them hate those that mock and oppose them.
#248 Re: The Garden » Terrorist attacks in Brussels » 483 weeks ago
Not really, I've seen it before. I'm not saying it's complete bullshit, but it doesn't talk about the reality of a multicultural society in Europe 15 years ago, it doesn't talk about how properly assimilated muslims became disenfranchised terrorists over the course of those 15 years.
It's a fine piece to use when people say that there's no such thing as extreme muslim terrorism, but that's not what I'm saying. I'm merely pointing out that the West has a significant responsibility in creating that sleeper army that is currently doing real damage to our way of life. And if we're not willing to look at our own mistakes, we'll never be able to solve this.
#249 Re: Guns N' Roses » What's your dream song inclusion for these shows? » 483 weeks ago
The only reason I'm partial to them including some VR and Snakepit songs (and dropping some of the CD stuff) is because I want them to rock. I like the piano ballads, but there are way too many of them. And in a live setting they kill the energy.
#250 Re: The Garden » Terrorist attacks in Brussels » 483 weeks ago
The scary thing is that (by far) most of these terrorists are second and third generation immigrants. Hell, a non-negligible number of these so called 'Syria fighters' are newly converted muslims from assimilated or white middle-class families.
I remember around 20 years ago, when there was a real sense of multiculturalism in Belgium and most of Western Europe. The level of religiosity amongst young muslims was low and kept going down. It really all changed after the second Gulf war. The WTC attacks were executed by muslim extremists from the middle-east, and no one would've thought it feasible that second generation muslims from the EU or the US would've participated or even condoned such a thing (no matter what lies Trump spins about seeing thousands of muslims celebrating in NJ...).
An unprecedented series of disastrous foreign policy decisions in the US and Europe literally turned all of those assimilated muslim immigrants into a sleeper army for middle-eastern terrorists. That's not an excuse, there is no excuse for the acts of barbarism these people have committed, but you have to be blind to not see how the West destroyed any chances of a peaceful multicultural society in the past decade and a half.
I'm appalled by the narrative pushed by Trump and Cruz and even certain ministers in the Belgian and French governments, under the guise of 'fighting back', 'strong responses' and 'anti-political correctness'. They are amplifying the mistakes we have made in the past instead of learning from them. This has nothing to do with political correctness, or so called 'naming the problem': the problem is extreme islamic terrorism. Everyone knows. Some might pussyfoot around the words, but that doesn't mean they don't know what the acute source of the problem is. Let's just stop this fucking posturing, and tackle the very real and very acute problem by infiltrating this community of insurgents, destroying them from within. The West should refocus its defense budget away from the military into its intelligence agencies. That's where this fight is going to be won.