You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#251 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

James wrote:

Single: Hardschool

B side: Silkworms

Wrap that fucker in cellophane and sell it to me.

I think this is the best hope, as these are the only two on the alt list, ie: the only two with pyro, video package, and rehearsals.

You hit on it. Release 2 songs per leg. Works for me.

They can have my money.

#252 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

I think it was Goldstein who said play 3 songs a leg and eventually release your album.

Good idea but that timetable is too slow in the modern era, imo.

I think it's a good idea to not bury good press / good will but in my book, you play a new song a show and release it mid-tour.

#253 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

I like the "what would I do" line but it kinda doesn't fit the song.

The song is basically about this absurd, delusional woman. That line flips it from this observational rant to a possessive question.

It detracts more than it adds. And I don't mind "Absurd" on repeat as long as they mix it right. It's a club music staple. I'm used to it.

#254 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why can't the fanbase drop the negativity even when there is good news » 203 weeks ago

Humans aren't always rational creatures.

Most of the business world is designed to avoid irrationality and provide consumers with a steady drip of content.

Combine that with a decade plus of mistreatment and bad decision making and you have resentments build up. This fuels the irrationality.

And then we had 4 years of the same tour when everything was going great, overpriced t-shirts, poor communication, and so on.

I love Absurd. I think people should be excited about it. I think Gn'R should make good on the  "whole new show" by playing more new songs and release at least an EP of music for their fans to enjoy. This would help us move forward in a positive way.

#255 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

Yeah someone posted the set list picture and it was on the alternates

That Medusa head artwork is badass as hell.

And yeah Slash is doing work on this song. Killer.

#256 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

Yeah it was on the Hershey set list. I think the only other new one was Hard School.

https://twitter.com/gnrsud/status/1422278503169417222?s=20

This is a song GNR fans might hate but metal fans would dig. It’s just a rocker. They stripped out the electronic elements outside of the bridge false ending. It’s wilder and got more guitars just like Axl said.

#257 Re: Guns N' Roses » Absurd » 203 weeks ago

Hell yeah. Sounded solid.

I hope they dial back the more shrill elements in the mix but I dug the more rock vibe.

Will or James need to update the songs section now. 5

#258 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will GNR release new music in 2021? » 203 weeks ago

In a way, we just got a confirmed song title for the new album.

#259 Re: Guns N' Roses » We don't really expect a new setlist do we? » 203 weeks ago

Haters Gonna Hate wrote:

This HAS to mean something is in the works right??? They wouldn't just play Silkworms and have Hardschool in the set just because of the leaks right? The leaks made no noise outside of gnr forums. I hope we hear Oklahoma and Soul Monster and The General now, even the versions without Bucket I would be fine with they show a lot of promise.

Yeah me too buddy. Fortus does a perfectly good job of covering BHs stuff

#260 Re: Guns N' Roses » We don't really expect a new setlist do we? » 203 weeks ago

James wrote:
Wagszilla wrote:

Absolute shot in the arm.

If they add Hard School and Perhaps things will be on a good path.

Unfortunately only 1 of those was on the rehearsal list iirc.

As much as I love getting to hear new live stuff.....do NOT waste Perhaps in a live setting for the first time.

That begs for a proper release...let people soak it in....then add it to the setlist.

Yeah Perhaps is the best of those demos.

Oklahoma seems like itmcould be something special with a little work. Not too hard, not too soft.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB