You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#2631 Re: Guns N' Roses » GnR Decision - HELP! » 884 weeks ago

Slashisvr wrote:

pistols and flowers big_smile

I agree 22

#2632 Re: Guns N' Roses » Dave Mustaine: "Buckethead is better than me and Slash combined" » 884 weeks ago

gnfnraxl wrote:

While I won't say that Bucket is better than Slash, I will say that since he left GNR Slash hasn't written anything that good.  I don't know if it's because he got lazy or lack of inspiration but he hasn't written anything that would come close to his GNR days since he left.

I think that 5 O'Clock's guitar work is as good as AFD's. He played great stuff on ALG, too. I agree that VR is Slash's weakest guitar work, although some songs match with his best GN'R moments. You'd have to listen some Neither Can I, Beggard and Hangers-On, Be The Ball, Back and forth, Speed Parade, Slither, Messages etc... He's still the guitar god, but unfortunately hasn't found another god to sing for him. I wish that his next singer wouldn't limitate the guitar force, at least.

#2633 Re: Guns N' Roses » Dave Mustaine: "Buckethead is better than me and Slash combined" » 884 weeks ago

Technically Slash isn't the best player of the world, but I'm still waiting for someone to play as heartfelt and soulful as Slash. Well, Jimmy Page was the closest to this, but Slash is amazing. He's the deepest guitar player of all time when it comes to emotions. BTW he made most of the most famous riffs in the music history. Long live 21

#2634 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Steven Adler arrested » 884 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

Why couldn't Adler see he had other options? It wasn't just GNR or bust. He was a well known name at the time. Could have easily found work in established bands. Hell, if the guy had actually cleaned himself up and not trashed the band in magazines, might have even been brought back into GNR.

He started a new band in 1991-1992, with the singer of Vain. The band was called Roadcrew, just like his band with Slash (and Duff). Steven sounded very ambitioius bach then, but they didn't last too long, cause Stevie's crack habit killed it all. In the late 80s-early 90s almost everyone in the rock business was outta this world, but Steven was in like another dimension. I feel sorry for him, cause he's still such an energetic drummer and a good guy, but very-very weak.

#2635 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR, Rock Band, the VMAs and 4 albums » 884 weeks ago

Yeah...it wouldn't sell too much, yet enouh to get the money back, and the CD saga would go to the history as a crazy, but successful project...while a 1-disc album with 13 songs (6-9 known years before) would kill Axl's legacy and mystery and could only tank (with mostly hc fan support). Although it'd be very cynic that after years of pissing to the fans, we crazy fuckers would save Axl's ass and ego 16

#2636 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR, Rock Band, the VMAs and 4 albums » 884 weeks ago

I think - based on the first VR album sales - there are at least 1,5 million hardcore GN'R fans, who'd buy the album without hearing a tone. Since they're hardcore fans, 1 million can buy all the 4 discs, or a 4-disc set. It's a strong possibility, I think. That's 1,000,000*4* $15 = 60 million bucks. Pretty good with close to zero promotion needed. They can make at least $ 30 million, even with a 4-disc box set. It'd still regain the money, with some profit, and without any risk. I still think that the guy who were caught misunderstood some info, and maybe Axl really has 4 albums ready, but it won't come out at the same time. But even if they do, it's not that crazy from the financial and fame point of view. Axl isn't interested in either money or fame, of course (if we can believe in Merck's words, who was proved to be a liar later). tongue

#2637 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR, Rock Band, the VMAs and 4 albums » 884 weeks ago

A Private Eye wrote:

If GNR are playing VMA's they best have a guitarist sorted. Supposedly Fincks in Cali the same time as the VMA's so it's possible for him to be there. Gotta wonder where he'd find time to rehearse with GNR while still on tour with NIN though?

Good point. I don't think Robin would be involved if a GN'R VMA performance happen though. You can't play for AC Milan and FC Barcelona at the same time, just because one of them don't have a match for some dates. Robin won't be coming and going between the bands in some days. Well, he can rejoin GN'R in 2010 again tongue  But since the 3-guitarist idea is only megalomania, they could do that one VMA song with only 2 players. I also don't think that Robin would be musically needed for a later tour, Fortus can replace him, but it'd be utterly ridiculous to tour behind your 'new' album without the guitarists who wrote that. That'd kill the new band's remaining credibility.

#2638 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR, Rock Band, the VMAs and 4 albums » 884 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

i wonder if we're really getting 4 albums? He seemed to be saying it was just something he'd heard around the place...maybe he'd just heard second hand forum rumours? Then again Bax has been saying for ages that there are 3 cds. I think 4 albums at once...would be a way to top UYI and give this band some of the old school legitmacy if it was all good material like the leaks...would also silence a lot of the complaints about the delays I think.

I don't see  Uni releasing 4 Nu-GN'R albums at the same time. That would only make sence if they gave up the hope that it'd do good in the mainstream media, so they're forced to rip-off the hardcore fans. Anyone else would download all the 4 albums... or 1 or 2, but nobody who isn't hardcore will buy it... cuase it's just too much. And why release everything you have, when it seems like your band that wrote and recorded the majority of the material fell apart? BH, Finck, Tobias are no longer in the band, and even the guy, Josh Freese, who wrote the title track left a long-long time ago.

It doesn't make any sense unless you have enough of the whole project and your plan is to scrap it with capitalizing the most you can on the hardcore fans to get back some of the money spent. So 4 albums at the same time would mean that Axl wants to end this... he's either retiring, or starting a new band, or the gates are open for the reuinon... It's only opinion, of course.

#2639 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl will see you now... » 884 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:

You forgot to mention all of the current and recently departed members...some of them haven't seen him in awhile either.

Yeah, I think Izzy has fresher memories of Axl than Brain hmm

#2640 Re: Guns N' Roses » POLL: BH Returning? » 884 weeks ago

Releasing a BH-dominated record, or even one with just some BH shining here and there would be stupid without having him in the band again. Imagine... the best moments are played by someone who left the band 4-5 years ago... Only one thing would be even more stupid: release an album without BH, who clearly has the best moment in the new songs - even though his role isn't more than a guest musician, his parts are mostly out of the songs, if you know what I mean... but it means that these are out of the mediocrity as well, which is a good thing. Without BH this band is nothing musically.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB