You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#2841 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bullet for my Valentine singer says Axl Rose is stuck in 1992 » 913 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

I'm afraid Axl is a bit overrating his importance and relevance. It's not 1992 anymore, he really should know that. (And not even 1987.)

how is he overrating himself?

He acts like the whole world would want him and wait for him, while only a few thousand people care.

#2842 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bullet for my Valentine singer says Axl Rose is stuck in 1992 » 913 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:
DoubleTalkingJive wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

I guess he means that Axl is acting like he'd be the same huge rock star he used to be.

Axl has the legacy behind him.  So in essence he most certianly his a huge rockstar.   How can one argue that.   He isn't Jani Lane or Bret Michaels, he is Axl Rose and that name alone holds alot of clout.  When he comes out on that stage and you look up at him, it's amazing.

Exactly.

While we're on the subject, I'd like to mention how funny it is to me that these guys always seem really upset about not meeting Axl. So much so that they have to attempt to insult him in interviews over it.

I agree that these guys are talantless, but I'm afraid Axl is a bit overrating his importance and relevance. It's not 1992 anymore, he really should know that. (And not even 1987.)

#2843 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bullet for my Valentine singer says Axl Rose is stuck in 1992 » 913 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:

classy.  first he says he never met him and then he insults him like he does.    those guys have NOTHING on GnR and never will.

I guess he means that Axl is acting like he'd be the same huge rock star he used to be.

#2844 Re: Guns N' Roses » Die Mannequin Talks about opening for GnR » 914 weeks ago

DoubleTalkingJive wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Since most of the opening bands tell the same weird stories about Axl, don't you think that he's that crazy? I'm sure he is. It doesn't make him a better or worse frontman, but he's not a down-to-earth person for sure.

As I stated in my post earlier, he definitely has his quirks for sure and his way of doing things but what this band is claiming is definitely embelished and far from the truth about how they don't hang with Axl.   As far as the security guard issue, I am sure he did push him up against the wall but that is what you get when you do a foolish thing like that, knowing how Axl is as far as security goes.    No artist would deal with a drunken mess coming up to them and putting their hands on them.

Do you remember that girl who hanged with them sometime during the Aussie tour? She said they had two afterparty rooms: one for Axl, Baz and the 'close friends', and another for the band and 'the rest'.

#2845 Re: The Sunset Strip » Baz blames internet for album tanking, no new album for "a LONG time" » 914 weeks ago

Jameslofton wrote:
Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
Jameslofton wrote:

Here's some advice: Next time, record an album people want to listen to. Only a handful of people on the planet are interested in some new late 80's hair metal material.

Angel Down is hardly late 80s hair metal.    People just associate Baz with hair metal because of the first Skid Row album.

Thats part of the problem, and he has never done anything to remove the stigma. In fact, he seems to embrace it.

James, Skid Row's most successful album, the second one, Slave to The Grind, wasn't hair metal at ll. It was the first heavy metal to open at No1 on Billboard. On the other hand, neither the first, self-titled album was pure hair metal. Baz didn't tank because people rank him as a hair metal act. He tanked because his completely irrelevant today, and hasn't done any significant since SR's Subhuman Race in 1995, and that album was a failure, compared to their previous works. It's very hard to get back to the top after 10+ years or irrelevance.

#2846 Re: Guns N' Roses » Die Mannequin Talks about opening for GnR » 914 weeks ago

Since most of the opening bands tell the same weird stories about Axl, don't you think that he's that crazy? I'm sure he is. It doesn't make him a better or worse frontman, but he's not a down-to-earth person for sure.

#2847 Re: The Sunset Strip » Take Ten (list your 10 faves of any group) » 914 weeks ago

Communist China wrote:
alexh0618 wrote:

Nine Inch Nails

1. Head Like a Hole
2. March of the Pigs
3. Terrible Lie
4. Sin
5. Hurt
6. Happyness in Slavery
7. Gave Up
8. The Hand That Feeds
9. Capital G
10. Only

These are not their only good songs. There are so many of them but these are the ones I listen to most.

I'll list my NIN too, but it doesn't look a lot like yours.

1. Only
2. March of the Pigs
3. Closer
4. Big Come Down
5. We're In This Together
6. Head Like a Hole
7. Ruiner
8. Just Like You Imagined
9. Mr. Self-Destruct
10. Hand That Feeds

It's a shame because I wish I could put more Fragile-era stuff on here but it's too big to compress into good songs. We only overlap on 4, which is cool, I think.

Since I'm a huge NIN fan, I'd add my Top 10 (although I wanted to do a Tori Amos Top10, but I'll do that later).

1. Something I Can Never Have
2. The Art Of Self-Destruction/Self-Destruction (remix)
3. Happiness In Slavery
4. The Becoming
5. Hurt
6. Burn
7. Reptile
8. I Do Not Want This
9. Ruiner
10. The Wretched

#2848 Re: Guns N' Roses » Remember this document? » 914 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

yeah exactly...i have no issues with them missing the match 6th date....but its the failure to supply any form of new target date that gets me. Or if its an issue that doesn't easily have a known end date (like litigation) then come out and say what the delay is caused by. This could be done in broard terms (disagreement with the record label etc)

But to miss the date then say nothing for the rest of the year does kinda suck a bit. To be honest I find it rather unprofessional. Axl is an amazing artist and that shows from the fact that he is able to keep a fan base throughout all the bullshit over the years. But immagine how many more fan there would be if the fan base had been kept in touch with as other artists do.

Still, its always been axls way (random no-shows and the like) and we have to take the bad with the good, and theres a hell of a lot of good in the beautiful songs he writes.

He doesn't tell the fans cause it's utter ridiculous to always find out another and another excuses over long years of 'unforseen delays'. I'm afraid that the truth is worse than fiction, that's why they're so silent.

#2849 Re: Guns N' Roses » Staff cuts hit Geffen. Interscope » 914 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Anyway, I don't think anyone really cares about this album anymore besides like 500 internet fans. Move on, everybody.

apparently you still care or you wouldn't be posting here.

No, I don't. Visiting GN'R forums is a habit for me, I couldn't care less about CD, although I enjoy reading the debates. But no, I don't wait for it and I don't care anymore if it ever comes out or how it will sound. The only thing Nu-GN'R gives me on a daily basis is laughing.

#2850 Re: Guns N' Roses » Staff cuts hit Geffen. Interscope » 914 weeks ago

Nobody has ever said that the album was handled to the reocord company. Nobody has ever said that CD's done. Remember the management's mantra bullshit? They will speak when there is something to say. Handling the album would be big news, since it may haven't happened for 16 years in the GN'R world. Anyway, I don't think anyone really cares about this album anymore besides like 500 internet fans. Move on, everybody.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB