You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#281 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 265 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:

By the way...I think the VPs Biden is considering...I"ll rank them....

1) Kamala Harris
2) Whitmer
3) Tammy Baldwin
4) Klobachur (spelling?)

I'd prefer the bottom two honestly...midwest women are bad ass and not provocative...

Kamala is bad ass smart though....and Democrats can't be afraid of that...

Biden has a hard choice...he'd better make the right one.

Do you want any of those people being President when Joe completely loses his mind next year?  Their VP candidates are as bad as their Presidential candidates were.

#282 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 265 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:
misterID wrote:

I think Trump is done. The Scarborough thing just broke him, along with his new press secretary. He's lost the "hold your nose and vote" republicans. All he has left are the sheep.

I'm not voting if Biden selects Abrams or Harris, can't do it. Biden is getting worse and worse, and the only thing that will change my mind is selecting Klobuchar.

Nope.  When push comes to shove, people are going to vote against the Dems.  The right will fear-monger their way to victory unless the left does a better job of fear-mongering.

This will be the sleaziest election ever.  It will be more negative than ever and both sides have easy targets.  Nobody will be motivated by the candidate, so it's all about who can be more sleazy.  Pathetic.

There's a chance he wins, of course, but he got into office from people not voting or voting third party because everyone assumed he'd lose. He was put into office because of "hold your nose and vote" republicans. I think he's lost those. I can see people voting Biden and down balloting republicans, giving the house back to neutralize Biden's power.

All he had to do was shut up. Maybe Trump wants to be voted out, which is what I'm really starting to believe.

I think you're way underestimating the hold their nose people on both sides.  Frankly if you're not a hold your nose person on either side at this point, you are the problem more than either candidate is.

#283 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 265 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:
misterID wrote:

I think Trump is done. The Scarborough thing just broke him, along with his new press secretary. He's lost the "hold your nose and vote" republicans. All he has left are the sheep.

I'm not voting if Biden selects Abrams or Harris, can't do it. Biden is getting worse and worse, and the only thing that will change my mind is selecting Klobuchar.

Nope.  When push comes to shove, people are going to vote against the Dems.  The right will fear-monger their way to victory unless the left does a better job of fear-mongering.

This will be the sleaziest election ever.  It will be more negative than ever and both sides have easy targets.  Nobody will be motivated by the candidate, so it's all about who can be more sleazy.  Pathetic.

This is exactly what trump wanted.

Nope.  You're not going to get away with playing the one-sided card on this.  Democrats are equally responsible...they can't even trust their own party to get the nomination right so they've now rigged two primaries in a row for their preferred candidate and he's as sleazy as Trump.

#284 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 265 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

I think Trump is done. The Scarborough thing just broke him, along with his new press secretary. He's lost the "hold your nose and vote" republicans. All he has left are the sheep.

I'm not voting if Biden selects Abrams or Harris, can't do it. Biden is getting worse and worse, and the only thing that will change my mind is selecting Klobuchar.

Nope.  When push comes to shove, people are going to vote against the Dems.  The right will fear-monger their way to victory unless the left does a better job of fear-mongering.

This will be the sleaziest election ever.  It will be more negative than ever and both sides have easy targets.  Nobody will be motivated by the candidate, so it's all about who can be more sleazy.  Pathetic.

#285 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 265 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:

What the hell is going on in Philadelphia that they need their own tabloid?  Fair question.

#287 Re: The Garden » Covid 19 » 266 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

I've decided that i'll play a roll in this conversation....i cannot believe that i had to make choices for the better of others....i love my country.....I miss the things that inspired me.....

Obama was the greatest President of our lifetime.

LOL - now THAT was funny.

#288 Re: The Garden » Covid 19 » 266 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

Cases.  Understand what that means.

I'll ignore the rest of your post since you're basically mitch jr at this point.

Personal insults...yet again...

Bro...you posted racist comments.  You don't get to complain.  You've done it to yourself.

#289 Re: The Garden » Covid 19 » 266 weeks ago

Cases.  Understand what that means.

I'll ignore the rest of your post since you're basically mitch jr at this point.

#290 Re: The Garden » Covid 19 » 266 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Sweden is getting fucked, and their economy is tanking anyway. Really, it goes back to the point that it doesn't matter if a state reopens or not, you can't force people to go out and spend money like they once did.

I would say it was funny that all those "open up, don't wear a mask!" protesters got sick, but it's not funny, it's friggin sad. Read about an ER doctor who said he'd been chewed out before but never to this extent from patients refusing to believe his diagnosis that they have covid because they think it's fake, or he's just trying to use them to make fake statistics.


Try again...either you don't understand at all what the point of what Sweden's doing is or you're just willfully ignoring it because you think it proves something.  Unfortunately for you, the jury is and will be out for a while on this.  You're a flattening the curve guy...you should understand what that means.  Here's a hint...it spreads it out longer.  Instead of seeing little snippets that support your theory and doing cartwheels, look deeper.  Understand what the bigger picture is.  The headline is interesting.  The article is more interesting. 

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles … -be-worlds

One thing of note.  Sweden did not lock down their nursing facilities either. I can't even begin to tell you how low the death toll would be had we done that efficiently and effectively.  But that doesn't fit the narrative either, does it?  If we put 1/10th of the resources we put into all the other crap into just protecting the nursing/long term care facilities where most of the deaths are occurring...

CDC changing it's mind again on the spread of the virus.  So glad we made all these brilliant decisions without accurate information.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB