You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#2971 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tommy/Westerberg consider a Replacements reunion » 896 weeks ago

madagas wrote:

you forgot the 98-99 Gnr.....8!:butt:

Oh sorry forgot, the only new lineup that released anything. Only thing is they didn't tour. 16

Add that to the list and it's even more of a joke.

#2972 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tommy/Westerberg consider a Replacements reunion » 896 weeks ago

Communist China wrote:

If Tommy goes the band will be boiled down to Axl, Dizzy and Pitman. Not a good thing.

Exactly. It will leave those three as the only originals of the new lineup. I mean there has been many iterations of GN'R:

GN'R Pre Adler and Slash
GN'R AFD
GN'R UYI
2001 GN'R
2002 GN'R
2006 GN'R
2007 GN'R

And now possibly there might be another version of the band. A band that has three albums and seven differrent itterations is a joke.

#2974 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tommy/Westerberg consider a Replacements reunion » 897 weeks ago

I think we're watching the remains of the old NEW lineup fal apart. Soon all the replacements will have been replaced.

#2975 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard Fortus Talks To GnrDaily.com » 897 weeks ago

von wrote:

Man, fuck this shit. I've licked the new band's balls long enough. Fuck Richard Fortus and these endless goddamn interviews about shit nobody cares about. No comment? In the past eight years I've refrained from doing this, but you know what? Slash would have a comment. Duff would have a comment. They didn't get led around by the dick on a retainer. I'm just so goddamn sick of Pisser and X Japan and every other worthless piece of shit project that gets announced and talked about and ballyhooed around like any real Guns fan gives one fucking shit about it. We want to know about THE BAND YOU'RE BEING INTERVIEWED ABOUT. If you can't talk because only Uncle Axl can, then shut the fuck up until he wants to speak up himself. It's not reaching out to the fans, it's being a cocktease and it's fucking boring. The soap opera ends here.

Again true.

#2976 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard Fortus Talks To GnrDaily.com » 897 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
the_real_jessica wrote:
DCK wrote:

Not answering a question about a song they did live in the past is close to lunacy in itself.

Maybe the reason is simply personal and in this respect, Richard does not cross the line and keeps what may be a secret between him and Robin.

he says no comment to them because he's really not supposed to be devulging GnR related info like that.  And the fanbase has been aware of this from when it started.   many years.

GN'R related info. It's a simple question of why did you play it live. Unless the answer is something like they're doing a cover of it for the album then there is no reason to say "No comment"

#2977 Re: The Garden » ides of march » 897 weeks ago

Heres a better roll

#2978 Re: The Garden » The Nothing Thread » 897 weeks ago

Metallica!!! yarp end of apssionf  dfsdlf

#2979 Re: The Sunset Strip » Motley Crue Discussion » 897 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:

This is EXACTLY what Guns N' Roses should be doing...

Well yeah. I mean I found this by stumbling on it and this sort of month blitz of press coverage started with one thirty second clip.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB