I’d be open to the argument but I too am skeptical. I’d want to see the numbers.

I suppose streaming and advertising revenues could be good money makers but they have every reason to spin the facts and fudge numbers and it won’t be as lucrative simply because the economy is a complete mess.

The domain is short and snappy. It works for marketing purposes.

But I don't really understand why you'd establish a new domain just to promote a tour or even an album.

A closed wall streaming platform seems too ambitious. High cost, high bandwidth stuff for a 30 year old band.

I hope it's because they're releasing a new album called Appetite For Destruction II.

Slash's solo after Alice's verse may be my 3rd favorite Slash moment.

I think the #1/#2 are the Estranged solo and the Live Era November Rain first solo.

So fucking good.

We're largely saying the same thing Monkey.

In 2002, the album would've been released after the VMAs and the US tour would've continued. Same thing as what you're saying about Metallica.

The Rio show in 2001 Axl made a point of saying what he said in 2008. This is the album, next year is another album, we'll be back on another tour.

But playing new songs live doesn't make sense unless you're releasing an album and they aren't.

Yeah but that'd cover CD II.

If the 3rd album in the trilogy is incomplete, the vocals probably are too.

And if CD II is put on the shelf for politics or business reasons, we have nada.