You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#331 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 692 weeks ago
Bro-mero wrote:That being said, people who disliked CD probably aren't going to like anything new as well because were in the "new GnR era". Sorry guys, this isn't 1987
What got me angry is Bono's false sense of Almightyness towards other forum-goers. He comments on ID's post making him sound like a complete jackass when in actuality, ID's comment was very logical.
Saying you don't get how those who didn't like CD would be excited for new music is dumb. It does lack common sense flat out.
not dumb at all. and is loaded in common sense.
common sense = if we are to get more music it'll be from the vault and probably more similar to cd than anything else you'll ever see.
#332 Re: Guns N' Roses » All Original GUNS Members Will Be At ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME » 693 weeks ago
fernando will filter all conversation directed to and from axl. fernando to axl, "stephen says he liked chinese democracy" fernando to stephen, "axl says thank you"
#333 Re: Guns N' Roses » All Original GUNS Members Will Be At ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME » 693 weeks ago
Seated from Left to Right
Axl,Dizzy,Izzy,Duff,Matt,Adler,Slash
LOL
lol
truthfully i think adler will be on axl's lap
#334 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
i thought you might think so
#335 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
war wrote:you responded to my post and i was simply agreeing with someone else. that's not whining. yet you jump right in with several posts about it. the only one whining is you. i don't have glasses on, of any kind. i agree with the majority of what you say when it is negative......all 1,00 times
yeah pretty sure my first response was to you and ID and the second was a direct response to ID. Clearly you missed that though.
if you dont use the quote feature people assume you are responded to their post when your post comes directly after theirs and is relevant in content.
i did a poll with my facebook friends and they agreed
#336 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
i assumed a promise wasn't an option because of how unrealistic it is.
#337 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
no because we'd be waiting in silent limbo.
#338 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
you responded to my post and i was simply agreeing with someone else. that's not whining. yet you jump right in with several posts about it. the only one whining is you. i don't have glasses on, of any kind. i agree with the majority of what you say when it is negative......all 1,00 times 
#339 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 693 weeks ago
me too. have them memorized before they are written because they've been written 5,000 times already. pot meet kettle. "gnr = no new music" coming from the people that = no new posts.
#340 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mar. 12th, 2012 - House of Blues, Los Angeles, CA » 693 weeks ago
mogs?
