I think they have hired Quick-Draw McGraw to man the delete button over there these days, I'm raging with some of the reasonable posts I have made deleted.

Of all the recent articles talking about the new album positively, thats the one they chose?

The fucking Boston Herald? Who gives a fuck what they think, surely a more prestigious newspaper reviewed the album.

Oh wait, but none of them said that

Absolutely pathetic.

We have skewed waaaaaaaay off topic lol, but while we're on the subject:

http://web.gunsnroses.com/news/article. … &fext=.jsp

Check out that article on the official website belittling the original members.

Of all the press reviews this is the one chosen?

Its a good record and I pretty much enjoy it all. I know GNR have diversified with each record and I always found that brilliant and stimulating.
But I do miss the old GN'R sound. I mean the old albums sound like a band playing as a group and it has a warmth and attraction.
This album is lacking that, its relied far too heavily in building songs piece by piece and assembling them later on at a computer. By doing so lost something natural, an organic vibe, that a computer program cant immitate and the old albums simply oozed.

I wonder why this band doesnt seem to mind the late arrivals?

I dont think Buckethead did, from what I read he felt upset with cancelations, keeping fans waiting, riots and lack of album.
Brain also said "I'll come back when they release the album", I guess he was fed up with the delays by that point.