You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#351 Re: Guns N' Roses » Using AI to give Axl Rose´s voice back » 118 weeks ago

It's good but it's still just mimicking. The development will be interesting.

#352 Re: The Sunset Strip » What Are You Listening To? » 119 weeks ago

I don't think it's sad. I'm impressed. He obviously thought he no longer need Pink Floyd to maintain popularity and he failed spectacularly. His first solo album was nothing more than a fart, the second too. When you say it sounds like cheesy 80s that is probably deliberate so he can appeal to the current thing. But that wasn't enough because the album was no good. Then he spent six years on his magnum opus, Amused to Death, and in between that he had a public wind with his the Wall performance when the Berlin Wall fell. But that too was a massive bomb. All the while Gilmour is out there selling millions of copies of his crap albums and enjoying worldwide success with his gaudy tours. Waters must have been fuming, maybe close to a nervous breakdown. Reality hit him in the face with brutal force in those days.

But he didn't lay down. He remembered his only success in those years, his Berlin Wall performance. So he focused on that and built himself up as a live artist. Aided by the fact Gilmour wasn't doing anything with Floyd anymore. Musically he's no longer relevant, but he has managed to make himself relevant as an artist and a performer, and using that public capital, become a very relevant political actor. Say what you will about his speech in the UN, he's clearly relevant in that arena with a lot of young folks looking to him with inspiration.

And for me personally his latest album, the first in 25 years, is clearly his best solo work. Put Gilmour, Mason and Wright (theoretically) in the mix and you have a great modern Pink Floyd album. So he has not only evolved as a performer in his old age, he's also improved significantly with his solo efforts. The Comfortably Numb remake was also incredible, and the little I've heard from the Dark Side remake also intrigues me. For so many years I never cared for any of his solo work because his first 3 albums were so disappointing, but here he is in his late 70s wheeling me in. For me he is about to create a second legacy which is almost as illustrious as his Pink Floyd heyday.

I listen to early Floyd. Not so much the Barrett period and the few albums after that when they were learning to create music on their own, but Atom Heart Mother and particularly Meddle have a lot of great songs. They sound like summer pop albums with cheerful melodies. Then you have Echoes, one of their best songs and clearly the bridge to later material.

All of Floyd's early solo material is a microcosm of what they each brought to the band. Wright with his soundscapes, Gilmour with his guitar, Mason with his rhythm and Waters with his energy and visionary concepts. He shouldn't have left the band.

#353 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 119 weeks ago

With our luck they'll sell it to some corporation and they will do a woke treatment of the material and rerelease it. I can easily see a song like It's So Easy being nigh on illegal to play in 20 years time. They've already started to replace words like "fat" in old books.

#354 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2023 Tour Dates » 119 weeks ago

Decent vocals from Axl.

#355 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 119 weeks ago

Yeah that is true. Thank God for leaks.

The worst thing for me is I don't understand what he's thinking. The songs are ready, he's filthy rich, Slash is back in the band, the label will let him do whatever he wants, and yet there is nothing. He said in that China exchange interview that he still wanted to release new music, so what gives? He could literally fart into a glass with Slash riffing and there would still be public interest, and here he is hogging all these great songs!

#356 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 119 weeks ago

What do you mean by "not let them shine"? Seems to me he let them do pretty much whatever they wanted, then he decided what went where. For me Robin, BH, Bumble etc. all shine when they contribute a great solo.

The problem is he almost never releases anything. Maybe that's what you mean?

#357 Re: The Sunset Strip » What Are You Listening To? » 119 weeks ago

The Wall has always been separate for me. In my Pink Floyd playlist I only have Dark Side, Wish You Were Here and Animals. The three classic Floyd albums with that spacey sound. The Wall is different precisely because Wright and Gilmour are not really involved. Waters dominates the sound. I don't think it's better than the other three, especially not Dark Side of the Moon. It's still very, very good though and worthy of being called a Floyd album.

I'm not going to disagree Dark Side is the best album of all time, but that doesn't mean it couldn't have been even better. "Time" in particular is the song I'm concerned about. I no longer find David Gilmour credible when he sings those lyrics. Money yes, Dogs for sure, but not on this existential song about the inevitability of death. Waters lack of technical ability is more than made up for with emotion, and this song demands it. I'm looking forward to the rerecording but I would prefer to hear him sing it in his young voice.

That Comfortably Numb is an amazing achievement. You would have to be crazy to try and remake such a classic song, and I'm sure he's doing it to spite Gilmour and Wright too. He makes some very good choices. Obviously the guitar solo has to go. You can't make a better guitar solo so why try. Instead he gives us this amazing, Gig in the Sky type vocal line. The more I think about it the more I think it is brilliant. It shouldn't be possible to make a worthy remake of that song, you would expect it to be halfway embarassing to be honest, and yet he pulls it off at 80 years old and motivated by a type of spite you only see in kids. It's like he's telling them, I don't need you, I don't even need to replace you. I can do something completely different on my own and it will be just as good.

Waters did a Q&A with Nick Mason some years back, it's on youtube, and in response to his musical powers he claimed to still be peaking. When I heard that I laughed and to some extent I still do, but now I can see why he might think that. In some respects he has evolved as a musician and is doing it better than ever. His latest album had a couple of very strong songs and this Comfortably Numb remake makes me very excited for the new Dark Side remake as well. The guy is 80 years old! Mick and Keith yeah they are still going, but they don't really give a fuck. This guy does. He's still a kid, eager to learn and to prove himself. That is rare.

#358 Re: Guns N' Roses » Using AI to give Axl Rose´s voice back » 119 weeks ago

I think the main problem with that song is not the voice, but Eric Dover's way of using his voice. He's got good pipes but he lacks the Axl factor on how exactly to make it sound special. On this song the AI can replicate the sound of Axl but not the dynamics if that is the right word.

Question is if the AI will ever be able to replicate subtle things like that.

#359 Re: The Sunset Strip » What Are You Listening To? » 119 weeks ago

Been listening to the Wall after the latest Roger Waters debacle.

Ricky Wright is barely felt on this album and Gilmour's only claim to fame is the solo on Comfortably Numb. For all intents and purposes this is a Roger Waters solo album. But it still feels like a Pink Floyd album. Whereas Gilmour and Wright's Division Bell doesn't feel like Floyd at all despite having the superficial sound.

I think Waters should have had more lead vocals on Dark Side. His voice is simply better despite being technically inferior to Gilmour. He really is the band and always was. This I think Mason accepts which is why he gets on well with Roger, while the other two were always in denial. Waters is still out there at 80 captivating a young audience. Not just musically either, but politically keeping the Floyd spirit alive in the full sense of it, while Dave sits at home, hogging the Pink Floyd brand, donating to global warming and calling Waters a racist on Twitter.

To me it's become obvious who is the fraud.

#360 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 119 weeks ago

I don't see how she could have had a better career than she's already had. Child actress, household name, Oscar win. She's a good actress but come on. She's not Elizabeth Taylor.

Season 5 Sopranos.

I'm trying to analyze why this feels like a half assed season and the beginning of the end for the show. They've stuck to some of the same style as season 4. Lots of close ups, but fewer long shots and artistic choices. Color wise it is more saturated. Season 4 had a lot of characters dressed in black and red surrounded by cold colors. This season is darker with even the scenery taking on lots of black. But where season 4 added a lot of existential themes to go with the new look and feel of the show, they are going back to the more directly mob related in this season. But it lacks the fun of season 1-3. Many staging shots appear to be lazy with Tony talking to people behind the Bing desk all the time. Stylistically it feels very sameish.

The storylines are starting to jump the shark a little bit. The typical fatigue of an old show. Having Tony and Carm separate is a mistake. So much of the show is centered around activities in the house. It's a bit like screwing up the Bar setting in Cheers, you don't do that. Having an entire episode deal with Carmela's relationship with a teacher is straight up boring. The New York thing too, I like the characters and the introduction of that world, but why do you kill off a great character like Carmine Lupertazzi just so you can have Johnny Sack replace him for  a handful of episodes before going to jail. And then the whole war thing with New York that culminates in season 6. It feels like a desperate need for drama.

Getting rid of Robert Loggia after 4 episodes is a massive waste. Every scene with his character is a joy. Also killing Tony B doesn't achieve anything other than set up the pieces for the Leotardo war later. They should have kept Buscemi on for the full duration. He was a great addition to the show.

The bear storyline is nonsense. Just to set up the return of the bear in the last episode and all this other pretentious symbolism.

That being said there are some absolute killer scenes in this season. Some of the best in the whole show. Tony fighting with Janice is pure gold. Some of the therapy sessions and flash backs are great. If I give the first four seasons all 6 stars out of 6, this season only gets 5.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB