You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#31 Re: Guns N' Roses » Better Video » 83 weeks ago

Yeah watching stuff like Rio and House of the Blues the band really comes alive on the CD songs.

I think the 2002 line up was just not the group to do AFD and UYI hits, but they needed to do them because they were GNR.

In a way it would have been nice if GNR had maintained with the UYI line up, and all subsequent Snakepit/VR/Slash stuff could be their future albums along with the more "classic" sounding Axl songs like TIL, Street of Dreams and Twat.

Then Axl could have done an industrial side project with pitman, buckethead and Robin busting out stuff like Silkworms, Shacklers, Oh My God etc. I'm sure some people still wouldn't like it, but I think as a sort of semi-underground side project for hardcores it would have been well respected.

Reminds me of when Michael Hutchence did an underground Electronic/Punk record called MaxQ without breaking up INXS.

Some INXS people loved it, some hated it, it got a small amount of public traction due to his fame but the style wasn't mainstream for the most part - yet it didn't really detract from the monster that INXS was at that time either.

#32 Re: Guns N' Roses » Better Video » 83 weeks ago

Never should have ever had three guitars if you ask me.

Given CD songs were rare live I would have put Richard on rhythm and had all leads played by Buckethead (and subsequently Bumblefoot after Bucket was driven out).

If we wanted to keep robin around for his CD leads - then have him on Rhythm instead of Richard and just let him do the occasional solo (like how Slash does with Richard now).

One of the main problems with the CD era band was the under-utilisation of bumble/bucket - GNR is a guitar oriented music for a good part of their catalogue and it just wasn't done justice a lot of the time with Robin.

#33 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 83 weeks ago

Cavaliere Orsi wrote:

p.s.: you don't know me directly but I'm sure that with a little effort you could understand who I am.

1511952633-daphne-velma-scooby-doo.jpg?resize=640:*

#34 Re: Guns N' Roses » KATARINA BENZOVA vs. GUNS N ROSES; GUNDAM TOURING SERVICES U.S. LLC,;G » 84 weeks ago

I would expect this case to get settled with an absolutely massive payout to Kat, but band takes ownership of her GNR pictures, no admission of guilt for Fernando, and mutual agreement to never speak of this again.

Behind the scenes I would guess Fernando works to maintain his marriage, Axl becomes angry at Fernando for shaming the band but forgives him because they are family.

Slash and Duff register their disgust but do not rock the boat because you don't break up GNR a second time and they know Axl considers him family.

To avoid a future re-occurrence some sort of token structure is implemented - perhaps fernando is officially demoted but more likely he is given an assistant with proper professional experience maybe some Slash/Duff work with as an underling but who will keep stuff on the straight and narrow.

Everyone saves face, Kat gets the payments due to her plus a little extra for the harm this does to her reputation (after all other bands not keen to hire someone who sues), team brazil continues on as Axl's surragate family and general managers all be it with a little help now. And the main band retains its structure and can go dark for a time before re-launching the next cycle in a couple of years - be it a new album or more likely some type of aniversary or farewell era tour.

Just guessing of course.

#35 Re: Guns N' Roses » "Eye On You".. a new leak of an old song but not that leak.. » 84 weeks ago

I love the idea of this song with guitar.

Not so into the guitar part laid down though, sounds very amateur.

#36 Re: Guns N' Roses » eye on you disc? » 84 weeks ago

I would like to hear this song with guitars as I think the vocal melody is cool. Original vocals with the screams would be best though!

#37 Re: Guns N' Roses » What happened to Axl's voice? » 85 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
uruguns wrote:

I loved your analysis. Do you have a link for that interview where "he said in an interview this was a conscious choice"?

I don't remember which it was. He said something along the lines of "I want to use a cleaner voice, but I do realize the fans love the rasp".

Maybe some of our GN'R historians can point the way.


It's the 'China Exchange' video interview in 2016.

Axl said:

"For a while, like with Chinese, I was trying to get my voice a lot clearer. I feel like that maybe fans didn't… necessarily respond to that so much as well, sometimes, at shows and things but I think it was very good for me to be even better at what I am doing right now."

#38 Re: Guns N' Roses » Justin Hawkins (The Darkness) reacting to the General » 85 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

I think the song is great and then last 45 seconds stink.

Why wouldn’t Slash take the wheel and say we need a better outro? Duff?

It’s just being lazy

I think it's them being non-confrontational mixed with not wanting to spend time/money retooling. And a bit of "old man has already proved himself" about them.

The band broke up trying to write music in the past, Axl has worked on this song for almost 3 decades, if he gives you what he's done and it's too short - what do they do about the drums - get rid of the brain part and have frank make it longer or what. How will Axl respond to these ideas. It's easier to just cut the song where it cuts even if that doesn't give you time to solo.

It's frustrating to me though, as the ending is warming up for epicness, like Axl going into that passionate scream, slash building some speed on the outro shred, them starting to interact melodically, then it just stops dead...it badly needs another 45 seconds or something to me. Give it a locomotive or breakdown outro.

You go back to early GNR and Slash was clearly hungry to prove himself. The way he added the big fuck off solo to SCOM even when it's a ballad. The way tracks like NR and Estranged and Coma are just dripping with awesome guitar, even smaller deep cuts like The Garden and he's putting monster licks in them - setting himself up as one of the rock legends. Same with his early guest stuff too - like on "Fields of Joy" by Lenny Kravitz - he's not fucking around.

But I feel his recent solos don't seem like he has as much to prove to us all, I guess he already conquored enough. Now and then you get a Wicked Stone or an Anastasia where he seems to bring his A game, but a lot of his appearances he just plays whatever. As he is slash his whatever is still good - but I don't sense the hunger he used to have.

#39 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Last Rock Stars script » 85 weeks ago

Slash's dad worked for David Geffen and he was known to the family.

(Confirmed by Slash here https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmaster … sh-hudson/)

So perhaps this did play a part in GNR getting the royal treatment at the label. Then again...there was a bit of competition to sign the band as I recall too, so maybe they just leveraged some good shit out of them.

Realistically you'd only have to hear 1980s Axl and Slash play together once to realise the incredible potential this group had, so while I'm sure much of the controversy was intentional marketing tactics, and while Slash comes from a showbusiness family, it's not like nepotism is really much of a factor in their success.

#40 Re: Guns N' Roses » Justin Hawkins (The Darkness) reacting to the General » 85 weeks ago

I've watched a few of his reviews of songs - sometimes he has some musical insights with his guitar like he will go over key changes or parts that are hard to sing or something. Didn't really cover much with it here I admit but it's sorta his process. I like that he reviews stuff from a positive angle in general (whole internet is largely negative), and also with a performers take on things.

I think he was obviously being diplomatic here though due to being a fan and/or knowing the band. For example, putting Axl's vocal issues down to running around/lack of confidence in the way the song was landing - which while maybe factors do not really account for the fact his modern voice almost always exhibits these symptoms. I also noticed he was clearly itching for the song to break into more - like maybe a huge epic outro or a big fuck-off guitar solo and it just doesn't come yet didn't really complain about the abrupt ending, other than mentioning he prefers the AFD to CD era musically.

Darkness is a "sometimes food" band for me, I love some of their stuff but it can be a little much at times  for my tastes too. Saw them live in his drug era and i must say was a hell of a good show despite the mess of his lifestyle at the time. Anyways he aways comes off as a good guy in these videos and I find him quite insightful usually, I wish he had talked more about this song musically this time and less about the specific peformance.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB