Certainly reads like Del's unwieldy prose.

Spot on Neemo.

The trial transcripts and evidence are up on callahan's site. Just google callahan & the west memphis three. You can read everything there unfiltered.

wm3.org supporters tend to blur the line between actual innocence and not guilty in a court of law.

The DNA evidence was introduced in the appellate phase and was doomed to die from the very beginning. The partial DNA results could not exclude the defendants from the crime scene; their lawyers knew that very early on. From an evidentiary point of view, the DNA was never going to exonerate the 3.

From the point of pure innocence, where we re-try the 3 in our own minds, the DNA evidence equally fails because there is still a likelihood that they were at the crime scene. The partial DNA matches still link the 3 to the scene of the killings, whether it is skin scrapings under the nails of Moore or the blood on Damien's necklace which was found to be either Baldwin's or Moore's, I believe.

The wikipedia article on the case grossly misrepresents the facts. WM3.org supporters have had their hand in writing that wiki and, despite the outing of obvious lies and fabrications, continue to do so.

And if you read the court transcripts you will realize why the documentary presented a slanted view of the entire case.

Jesse Misskelly has been represented as a 'retard' by his own defense team and the Echols/Baldwin attorneys. However, on the stage, the defense's own expert admitted that Misskelly was not retarded and was aware of the difference between right and wrong.

This is important because the crux of the case comes down to Misskelly's confessions (plural) which, in the determination of actual guilt or innocence, condemns Baldwin, Echols, and Misskelly.

The first confession was delivered without any warning after Misskelly made it clear he wanted to clear his conscience. Although he made mistakes as to the timing of the crime, which were corrected in a second tape recorded interview, he knew aspects of the crime that only the police knew, i.e. that the Byers boy was the only victim who had his genitals mutilated, that two of the boys were sodomized, that black 'rope' (in reality shoestrings) was used to hogtie the victims, and that two of the boys were drowned while the other was killed in a different manner.

Misskelly went on to confess AFTER his conviction while being transported to the county jail. He told the escorting officers that the appeals process was not going to save him because he was involved in the killings. The officers informed the DA and Jesse's lawyer who tried vehemently to stop Jesse from making another statement to the prosecution. Remember this was post conviction and there was nothing Jesse could gain from making such a statement. Stidham, jesse's lawyer, was exasperated and had to listen to jesse lay out the act of murder to the DA. He told the authorities he had held one of the boys and even ran down one after he tried to escape. To corroborate this story, Jesse told the DA that he threw an empty Evan Williams whiskey bottle under the highway underpass in the Robin Hood Hills woods. As the sun was setting , the DA, the police, and Stidham went out to the crime scene, recovered a broken bottle top which was immediately matched to the Evan Williams whiskey bottle. It was found in the exact place Jesse had said it was located and offered a piece of evidence that the police were not even aware.

The Paradise Lost documentaries are very well made and I do encourage watching them. But the director Joe Berlinger admitted that he was convinced of the 3's innocence after only a five minute conversation with Echols. The teleplay is decidedly one sided as it did not truly capture details of the trial and the appeals which were commonly known to those covering it.

1. During Misskelly's trial, the defendant sat with his head down the entire trial. The jurors could see into the holding area at times and noticed Misskelly joking around and smiling with his attorneys before the proceedings started

2. Echols was decimated on the stand; this point was brought up by Jason's lawyer in the documentary. Echols hedged on his involvement in some form of satanic rituals; Misskelly gave police a detailed description of the meetings which included orgies and animal sacrifice. Echols hedged on his knowledge of Aleister Crowley; the DA produced a legal pad that Echols had scribbled on in which the defendant had been writing the names of various people, one of which was Crowley.

When Melissa Byers took the stand and told the jury that her deceased son was frightened  one day (before the murders) by a man with long black hair and wearing all black clothes who drove up to their house, jumped out of a green car, and taken his picture, the connection with Echols was established. All the elements of the description fit Echols.  Misskelly had mentioned in his confession that Damien had pictures of the three boys in a briefcase he brought to these night meetings. Echols, according to Misskelly, had selected these victims some time before the crimes.

3. The DNA and fiber evidence could not exonerate the 3; fiber evidence could not eliminate Echols and Baldwin as the source of fibers found at the crime scene. DNA evidence could not eliminate Echols and Baldwin as being source of DNA found at the crime scene.

I strongly suggest, if you are interested in the case, to probe deeper because the documentaries promote the wm3.org agenda and not the true facts of the case.

I would like to at least have the man stand behind the music. Where has the man been? He has come out of hiding several times to complain about how the release did not go as expected, hinted at a better effort, then disappeared again.

He could at least go on a small club tour to promote this album, talk to a few reliable rock journalists, opt out of Universal, and create a better fan to fan interface.

He may not care about the business side of things, but he also doesn't care about the fan-artist side either. It is bitterly apparent that he paid off his debt and now his career is in a bit of stasis; past success has certainly faded and a new career as a middle of the road former icon awaits. How does he react? If he is smart, he slims the process down, becomes tech savvy (a la Trent), and brings music to the fans directly.