You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#421 The Sunset Strip » Motorhead - Ain't No Nice Guy (ft. Ozzy, Slash) » 253 weeks ago
- exoterica
- Replies: 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjp0JQn4FFE
This isn't new.
But many are unfamiliar with it.
Some good work from Slash.
The acoustic version from the March or Die DVD with Phil Campbell is also killer.
"'Ain't No Nice Guy' was actually a radio hit, but that was completely down to us, without any help from Sony, or its marketing department at Epic. 'Ain't No Nice Guy' wound up No. 10 in the radio charts, and Sony didn't make call one – imagine what would have happened if they'd given it just the slightest amount of effort! But no: they actually tried to stop it from being played. All we needed was about fifteen grand or so to shoot a video but they wouldn't let us have it. So we took about $8000 of our own money and made our own – Ozzy and Slash, nice guys that they are, even came down and appeared in it. Although the video's a bit jumbled, it didn't turn out too badly. But MTV didn't play it for a while because Sony took three weeks to sign the release!"
#422 Re: The Sunset Strip » Who should've been bigger? » 253 weeks ago
A Flock of Seagulls
Should've owned the early-to-late 80s pop market instead of wrongly being summarized as a one-hit wonder.
The infighting between brothers Mike Score (frontman) and Ali Score (drummer) is a debacle of Axl vs. Slash proportions. After a phenomenal debut record with 3 top-tier tracks, they followed it up with an experimental, anti-pop snyth record. It's like Neil Young's Trans without the pop smarts. Their career never really recovered.
If they dropped their drummer, didn't rush their 2nd album to market, and got a better producer, they could've been big.
#423 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl's optimism in 2002.... » 253 weeks ago
Comment from Izabel Oliviera:
So, after Paradise City, still BLOWN AWAY by the show, I saw John M had found an After Show pass!! Talk about luck!!
Axl also mentioned that Catcher in the Rye will be on the third record. He said that CD will be a very intense record and the second one will be more of introspective. He said they'll keep on touring and that he really enphasized they'd be back in the summer at the end of the show because this is going to happen (which makes me wonder about these cancellations...) At this point someone asked if CD was coming out in 2002, and he said no (kinda obvious, but....)
This was according to her the afterparty for the 12/05/2002 show at Madison Square Garden.
#424 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl's optimism in 2002.... » 253 weeks ago
Any source on this? Better for example looking at the credits i very similar (in credits) to the tracks above and vocals by 04 at the latest.
I bet Leave Me Alone, Seven, Thyme and The General all had vocals by 2002 for Beltrami to work on shortly after.
1. Shacker's was inspired by media coverage of 2007 Virginia Tech shooting and connection to Mr. Brownstone.
2. Axl's comment about singing it over Christmas. Vocals were finished in December 2006 and 2007 at The Palm in Vegas. Betas comments about the album being finished/in-negotiations.
1.-4. All sound to the ear markedly different than the Sean Beavan "clean vocal" sessions. Even "Better". Way more body in his vocal.
I'm not sure there's any proof though on this first two albums stuff and if so, what "first two albums"?
1. Axl described it as much:
"For now, we’ll concentrate and keep our focus on this album, but I will say I’ve always thought of it as a double." Axl Rose (December 2008)
"But basically, we have what I call kind of the second half of Chinese. That's already recorded." (Axl, Revolver Magazine, 05/14)
2. Fan reported story to GNROnTour in 2002. Obviously not exactly a smoking gun but that's what they said. And far before the Baz comment "he's like George Lucas, dude!" story which underscores its reliability. "Catcher = 3rd album, Chinese is more aggressive" is the summary. I'll have to dig it up.
#425 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl's optimism in 2002.... » 253 weeks ago
The sad thing is by 2006 you'd be lucky if they played three a night.
I think he was probably jazzed about being a public rockstar again. In other words, social isolation is bad for you.
"Shacklers Revenge" didn't have vocals until 2007.
"Soul Monster" didn't have vocals until December 2006/2007.
"Scraped" I think fits alongside the two above.
"This I Love" was possibly a 2006-2007 vocal session.
Neither "Catcher" nor "This I Love" were destined for the first two albums, the former being a 3rd album song and the latter being strong-armed by Robin into being a thing after Axl forced Dave Dominguez to wipe previous versions of it.
I think he had 2 albums ready in 2006 at his post KROQ party.
I'll repeat this until I'm blue in the face: I have no idea why GNR/Universal is not releasing this stuff. It's a sunk cost.
#426 Re: Guns N' Roses » If The World.... » 253 weeks ago
Maybe so.....but hindsight tells us he still gets paid at the end of the day.
Yes but boomers like Axl are incapable of seeing past their nose.
The time for a "Ryan Reynolds leaks Deadpool demo" powerplay was pre-VMAs in 2001-2002.
He didn't have a band ready to make good until then.
Everything after the tour cancellation should be interpreted as Axl falling back to earth and acting like a mere mortal.
I have no idea about 2004. That's always been the most interesting part of the saga to me.
This lack of any sort of response by Axl....excluding polishing the same songs over and over for years....is one of the reasons I believe he threw his hands in the air and practically gave up on it in the early years of the saga.
What do you mean?
I think it's a result of being out of touch with the music business and real life shit. He was a child star, he wasn't a businessman. He had his ass kissed from the jump and he could get away with it because he was in the Top 5 entertainers in the world. I'd like to give him credit but tearing down YouTube videos in 2020 doesn't exactly prove he's wisened up. Him having the clarity of mind to leak something on Napster in 1999-2002? You're more likely to see pigs fly...
In regards to never releasing it: he was afraid, pure and simple. Everyone treated him like a fragile snowflake. So he went into turtle mode and tried to polish TWAT on repeat. He didn't want to admit that he needed a producer. He just wanted to delay reality to maintain control in his head.
And the finished album had to be a Caram abomination, no one was gonna fund it, he wasn't paying Wallace, and he had to change it from the leaks somehow to justify its commercial existence.
Azoff knew exactly what he was doing on both sides of the aisle.
#427 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tracks on the album better than the Rough Mixes » 253 weeks ago
and its just too slow. Sorry I prolly haven't listened to it in about 10 years so I don't know all the lines, yeah, the I'll Kick Your Ass In is dumb, but the song sounds like music for a ballad with Jah Rule & JLo or something.
I get what you're saying there.
In my perfect world it gets a heavy version like the demo and and more uptempo pop version so it's more singable.
The instrumental has a chilling doom and gloom, existential vibe to it.
It deserved so much more than being a song aimed at Slash and other "enemies".
Absolutely.
imo, the song is supposed to an anti-war, powers-that-be song, but of course Axl can't help himself doing the Blacklist whinge first.
I wish Bucket or someone had stood up to him and said that the lyrics aren't acceptable.
He probably had the same experience everyone else did. Release an album? Write lyrics? Do/re-do vocals?
YOU HAVE INCURRED MY GINGER WRATH.
#428 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tracks on the album better than the Rough Mixes » 253 weeks ago
'Sorry''s kinda sappy. I don't think the lyrics are much of an issue.
Huh? How does the first statement not contradict the second?
The "I'll kick your ass" line is the worst thing Axl's ever written.
The chorus lyrics are solid.
He made a powerful song with Civil War level potential about personal vendetta.
#429 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tracks on the album better than the Rough Mixes » 253 weeks ago
Couldn't you just plop the vocals from the Rock Band multitracks onto the instrumental demo of Sorry? Sure, it'd be a Frankenstein's monster and not a "real" demo, but needs must...
It wouldn't work.
The guitar would drown out the main chorus.
I really wish "Sorry" had an alternative cut with better lyrics ala "Don't Cry (alt)".
#430 Re: The Garden » The new and God willing improved politics thread » 253 weeks ago
I’m going to try to humor you on this one...so please bear with me here.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - I support neither political party.
I'd appreciate it if you'd humor entertaining that thought.
Trump and Russia worked together.
Politicians work together? The shock and horror!
Whether that is illegal or not is a different question.
The problem being it fires up Russiagate truthers that it's all a grand conspiracy.
It could be a conspiracy. Conspiracies happen. There's just no evidence for this one.
And the saga itself was beyond the pale in absurdity.
All the anti-Hillary stuff all the anti-liberal stuff I just purely dismiss as right wing propaganda.
Do what you will.
But the only way you could say this with a straight face is if you have a short memory or unknowledgeable of the Clintons.
Hillary has a rap sheet a mile long: NAFTA, Travelgate, Chinagate, a career of lies. Take your pick.
I mean I could take or leave all that and just say "Hey, look at 1998 of the Clinton administration".
And no I'm not talking about the blowjob.
I just purely dismiss as right wing propaganda.
There are many journalists "on the left" that constantly, to this day, point out the evils of the Clinton and Obama admins.
Very little in the way of legal consequence has ever occurred.
Yes, powerful people are often not prosecuted for their crimes. See: Bush administration.
I have to believe that the former was likely political propaganda designed to hurt the opposition
You mean like Russiagate?
propaganda designed to hurt the opposition
Like Fox News?
propaganda designed to hurt the opposition
Like CNN?
Why shouldn’t I believe that?
Of course you believe it. You just don't understand the structure of the U.S. political system.
I’ll grant you the pointed this is all tribalism.
It all brings us back to the original point. This thread is 99% innuendo and calling each other stupid.
I haven't seen any discussions of the economy, economics, monetary policy, money in politics.
You know, real political issues and policy positions.
It's all just political theatre. And you're dancing to someone's tune.
You can dismiss me as a Trumper, Berniebros, conspiracy theorist, idiot, whatever. I don't care. I'm confident and happy with my orientation towards the world. It takes too long to elucidate my thoughts and as evidenced by the COVID thread, when I do take time, people just kinda brush it away and don't engage with it because it counteracts the dominant narrative that has been spoonfed to them by the media. Could I be wrong? Sure! Show me. Let's have a conversation like grownups.
I'll back out of the thread now. It just doesn't seem like a productive use of time. I don't want to come off as an elitist, not my intent at all. I want to be cool with everyone. Always have, always will. I'd just encourage everyone to turn off the news, look into recent history (Reagan-Obama admins), read some finance books, and ask questions. Maybe this kick in the ass will help you get in the right direction maybe you'll laugh and be like hey that Wags guy is a real asshole. I can't control the reaction.
I came into the now locked political thread to post about the radical left which is very worrisome and then posted an article from the educated left about the dangers of the far right. Maybe there's a balance there. Maybe I look at both sides and care about everyone. Maybe I'm right about some things.