You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#461 Re: Guns N' Roses » US Tour Cities » 493 weeks ago
I saw some of it, but missed most of it.
#462 Re: Guns N' Roses » US Tour Cities » 493 weeks ago
Has Izzy indicated if he is wanting to be part of the reunion?
#463 Guns N' Roses » US Tour Cities » 494 weeks ago
- sp1at
- Replies: 48
Patience... #GnFnR pic.twitter.com/Jk91zm9E0C
— Guns N' Roses (@gunsnroses) March 25, 2016
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fc43a1le8wqd … T.mp4?dl=0
Atlanta, GA
Boston, MA
Chicago, IL
Cincinnati, OH
Dallas, TX
Detroit, MI
Houston, TX
Kansas City, MO
Nashville, TN
New Orleans, LA
New York
Orlando, FL
Philadelphia, PA
Phoenix, AZ
Pittsburgh, PA
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Seattle, WA
St Louis, MO
Toronto, ONT
Washington, DC
#464 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N Roses launch in T minus.... » 494 weeks ago
If GN'R were to do a surprise show, I would look towards The Roxy. It is run by Goldenvoice/AEG and there is a gap in the calender for 4th and 5th April
#465 Re: Guns N' Roses » Update from Izzy Stradlin » 497 weeks ago
faldor wrote:Now we have the pleasure of trying to decipher Izzy's tweets. That should be interesting.
So what in your opinion is his motivation for surfacing now? As has been said, he could've joined Twitter at any time over the past few years, or made some attempt to communicate with fans/the media before now.
Is it just a coincidence?
Certainly putting up a link to a GnR tribute band could be construed as a sarky, albeit humourous, comment on the state of things..??
& it's not like he's using the medium to sell his own shit or promote a record or anything? He's basically just shooting the shit about GnR so far..??You're better versed in Twitter than me, faldor, so what's going on man?
Because GN'R are 're-uniting', I guess Izzy will be receiving more queries just now, so having a visible presence on Twitter will help ease the amount of questions he is being asked.
As for the rest of it, I suppose he will just be having a bit of fun with it until the novelty wears off.
#466 Re: Guns N' Roses » Update from Izzy Stradlin » 498 weeks ago
Don't you mean a bluff? A double bluff would mean he wants people to be disappointed when he isn't there come April. Tell the truth when people won't believe it. Not nitpicking, just checking to see if I get the meaning correct.
I don't see a bluff or a double bluff making any sense. Making people think you aren't coming when you actually are is something Axl or Slash could do. Izzy wouldn't get nearly the same response to justify not promoting this as a bona fide reunion, merely for the sake of some last minute reveal. And a double bluff would just make the fans disappointed when he's not part of it and they thought he was.
To me Izzy is telling it straight like we would expect. And that means this isn't really a reunion at all. Axl just needed a few replacements in GN'R, and Slash/Duff happened to be available. Notice how he isn't saying he's not involved because he doesn't want to, he's just informing us he's not involved. Maybe Axl never called and this is his message saying "hey, I want in on this!".
Or he didn't like the terms and said "fuck this I'm outta here", then goes on Twitter to squash false rumors because he cares about the fans.
Makes me realize it doesn't matter what anyone says in GN'R. Fans will interpret statements any which way. Because we have gone so many years with just loose rumors and innuendos, conflicting statements, scams and plans that never panned out. Even a confirmed, direct statement made by Izzy personally is met with: nah, not buying it!
Yeah, bluff is technically correct. My mistake
And the rest of what you said makes sense
#467 Re: Guns N' Roses » Update from Izzy Stradlin » 498 weeks ago
Izzy phoned me earlier tonight. It is 100% Izzy on Twitter. He tried to verify twice by email but everyone saying "he's been hacked" got me paranoid (especially when seeing my forum posts shared in the wider media). Asked the account to email me a photo with todays date or phone me..... he called and I knew instantly it was him.
No doubt whatsoever
Cool experience. Izzy's twitter handle makes sense if nothing else.
Do you think Izzy's messages are a double bluff? It would follow the whole reunion promotion theme so far.
#468 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses to headline Lollapalooza? » 498 weeks ago
Where is sp1at when ya need him most?
Hi Will. I got a new contract on 11th Feb for 6 months which is keeping me busy.
The last thing I heard a while back was that Slash is going to be given a gap to complete whatever existing commitments he has, which meant any info I had became redundant and all the dates changed.
The people that gave us the Coachella line-up are fairly sure GN'R are not a Lollapalooza, and if this Eddie has his dates correct, then GN'R cannot play Lollapalooza because of the radius clause. That is the best I can offer.
#469 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 502 weeks ago
Since that initial BIllboard article has been pretty accurate so far I assume the 25 number for a US stadium tour is correct as well?
Yup
What I don't know is if there is an alternative plan in place as well, or if the amount of venues switched on will be based on ticket sales for Las Vegas. So, there are some unknowns there
#470 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 502 weeks ago
So basically a tour is already set in stone but we are just waiting for the actual announcements?
Yup. The band had to decide what they wanted to do.