You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#41 Re: The Sunset Strip » Daily Hot Celebrity Piece of Ass Pic of the Day Thread » 672 weeks ago
No offence guys but bragging about fucking girls hotter than the girls being posted in this thread just makes you sound like a fucking dork 
It's like threatening to beat someone up over the internet. Pics or it never happened.
#42 Re: The Sunset Strip » Daily Hot Celebrity Piece of Ass Pic of the Day Thread » 672 weeks ago
Jennifer Lawrence in my opinion is the exact type of gorgeous I like. Girl next door type absolutely gorgeous, cute, sexy and beautiful all in one. Totally the type that looks as good all dolled up as she does in sweats and t-shirt.
As for Katy Perry I've noticed she's not very photogenic. She doesn't take still photos well. She's like my ex girlfriend I told you guys about who had the drinking problem. Absolutely gorgeous but for some reason never looks that good in still photos. Film her though and she looks amazing. Katy Perry also a lot more pretty when she tones down the makeup and wears natural colours
If Justin Bieber is more sexually attractive to you than Katy Perry I'm affraid you ARE gay
As for the women today not being as hot these days I disagree. Ashley Leggat(my fav, nobody knows her though), Anna Kendrick, Brittany Snow, Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Kaley Cuoco, Zoe Deschanel, AJ Cook, etc etc all just as hot as any from the past in my opinion. Don't let your "Teenage Dreams" cloud your judgement :haha
Ashley Leggat about 4 hours ago. Holy man!
#43 Re: Guns N' Roses » March 1st Evo Song of the Week » 672 weeks ago
I'm no so sure classic Gn'R will always win. I'm obviously more a classic Gn'R fan than a CD era fan but I'm voting for Prostitute again.
#44 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 672 weeks ago
WTF Polluxlm! You act as though without Slash it's a forgone conclusion that Axl would've gone on to greatness anyways while Slash would be an unknown. What I'm getting sick of is you stating things as fact like Slash is phoning it in or his fans don't like his music as much as Axl's like CD. This inseccant need to say that Slash isnt pushing himself and not delivering while Axl is, is just nuts. Ummm.... excuse me but Slash delivers consistently for his fans. Axl has his fucking thumb up his ass playing music Slash co wrote. Axl is fucking scared to do anything while Slash gets out there and rocks. It's hilarious to see you criticize Slash for the things Axl is doing and then praise Axl for the things Slash is doing. You've got it backwards. You can like CD all you want but you can't make shit up. Slash is delivering, Axl is doing NOTHING. He's giving nobody anything to like.
One of my best friends who has never been a big fan of Gn'R, just recently bought a Les Paul just like Slash's and he's been sending me links to Slash on youtube. He sent me Back to Cali the other night saying that's what he's going to learn next. I was genuinely surprised at his sudden interest in Slash and finally asked him if Slash is his favourite guitarist. His answer was and I quote "Yeah he is now. he's become a fuckin legend cause he as good or better now than he was with Gun N' Roses". So your opinion that Slash isn't doing anything note worthy just isn't true. To you maybe but you need to learn how to make the distinction between what you think and what's actually happening for others. Slash has fans for a fucking reason and it's not all past material. Yes Axl has fans thanks to CD but I'd be willing to bet Slash has gained more fans through his efforts post Gn'R than Axl has. In fact I'd say Slash has likely gained fans while Axl has lost fans based on musical output and the quality of it. That's just a guess but it wouldn't surprise me.
You talk about relief to your ears when you put on TWAT or Catcher well I can honestly say after hearing a few CD songs the relief to my ears when I put on Slither or Anastasia or Messages or anything that sounds organic and not produced to fucking hell is significant. I can only tolerate CD for a few songs and usually it's limited to CD, Better and Prostitute. In fact I don't remember the last time I botherd listening to anything else off that album. You say there's only 1 average song well that's fine but in my opinion I feel there's 3 really bad songs, 3 good songs and 8 average but mostly forgettable songs. Wow what a true masterpeice right.
but the reason I'm here today is because of Axl and what he, God willing, MIGHT do next.
That says it all. What he MIGHT do. he's not doing anything yet you act like he's conquering the world. People who enjoy Slash's music don't need to hang on the internet speculation what if and if only and maybe. Slash just delivers. The reason you're here and you admit it yourself is because you're hoping he does something not because he is doing something. So get it straight and stop acting like Slash is sucking while Axl is succeeding. Those who enjoy Slash's music don't need to hope he does somethng cool. He's already doing it. Guess it's easier to bash somthing you don't enjoy and say that "your guy" is better based on potential though. ou've gotten to the point now where it honestly seems like you are bashing Slash t make yourself feel better about Axl. I'll take results over potential every day of the week. I'll enjoy Slash's records while you keep hoping for Axl to do something
Also... In time, No I will not feel like CD feels like Gn'R. It's been out for 5 fucking years almost. How long do I gotta wait for it to feel like Gn'R? Axl was the voice of Guns N' Roses but I've long sinced realized what feels like Guns N' Roses is the style and tone of Slash's guitar playing. How can you sit there and seriously say Slash's playing is just the variation. Th Did you ee like theold band? Slash's playing embodied the sound, feel, style and attitude that was GunsN' Roses. When I hear Slash play even on his new songs for me it sounds like Guns N' Roses. is tone IS Guns N' Roses every bit as much s Axl's voice was. When I hear Axl sing anymore I hear a guy trying to sound like Axl Rose but falling short. Even on CD. His music is forced, his voice is processed and produced to a level it's almost unenjoyable on some songs. There's nothing organic about CD and it doesn't have an honesty that was Gn'R. Slash's guitar playing still embodies that.
Seriously though you gotta stop acting like Slash is lazy and uninspired while Axl is the one with creative drive and desire.
#45 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 672 weeks ago
Who said anything about SCOM.
You have this shit ass backwards.
The place where the songwriting is ALMOST NON-EXISTANT is GNR.
When did they write a new song last? 2008? When is the next album due 2016? What has the even done since 1993? ONE RECORD?
The place where the song writing doesn't exist is GNR, it's the band that's been unable to do anything but do live shows for the better part of two decades now.
30-40 songs, 15 of which we've heard. Judging by the quality of those likely there are some gems among the leftovers too. And even if those 15 songs are all we ever get to hear it's still on par (I'd say it crushes it) with Slash' 6 major albums. Who cares if he puts out 40+ songs you never want to hear again.
Hey, nobody's denying Axl is a fucking train wreck when it comes to almost anything, but still his creative output manages to be more impressive.
I like Axl more than most people but I'm sick of the need to run down the ex-members to justify Axl's problems.
Got nothing to do with justifying his problems, it's got to do with what you prefer. Amiable, on time and productive but with a shit output, or epic train wreck with the potential for a handful of memorable songs? I don't know about you but I'm in it for the music. Not live shows, not interviews, not an annual christmas record or a cash gig with LL Cool J on MTV.
The other members have put out a TON of great music and lived full musical careers outside of GNR while Axl remains crippled by psychological problems that causes the endless drama and bullshit list of people who've "wronged" the band...prevents him from achieving the greatness he once had, seemingly makes it impossible to release even a morsel of his creativity in terms of new music....and seems to have to be coaxed into doing even the smallest of changes to the live show.
A ton? Really? Let me see your playlist. Snakepit 1 and Contraband are far and above and they have maybe 3 good to very good songs each. Even that is cutting them some slack considering how laughable the singers are.
Rest is true, not denying that.
You can pretend stuff like Anastasia isn't good guitar if you want to, but if Axl or Izzy had sung over the same shit in 1993 we'd all be jacking off to it.
A pretty big if! That'd be like saying your meal would have been great had Gordon Ramsay cooked it. And let's not get ahead of ourselves here. Anastasia benefits from being one of only a few highlights in the desert of generity that is Apocalyptic Love (say cheese!). The intro is catchy enough but I'm certainly not getting my dick out. After that we have a few minutes of Mylesiocrity with nothing all too exciting going on in the background. And you act like I don't know what a good Slash solo sounds like. He's my favorite player in the genre, but definitely not because of anything he does on this song. Adding sweat to get a little extra length actually applies well here. Basically he's phoning it in. Like he came up with a decent riff, did some standard stuff on the verses and felt the need to plaster on a solo without having any real drive for what that should be.
And that's "his best work in years".
Honestly lately you've seriously been drifting into uncharted fanboy territory with Axl. You talk about Slash phoning it in and not pushing himself yet praise the laziest mother fucker on the planet. A guy who's content to live off Slash's work and tour the hits. Chinese Democracy is underwhelming for far too many people for you to be acting like Axl is the musical genius post 1994 while Slash's output is just a guy phoning in cheesey generic stuff. Axl had 13 years, an insane budget an a group f incredibly talented musicians to do CD and THAT is what he came up with? An average at best album. The fact you can sit there and paint the guy as a creative genus who pushes himself while slash is a slacker is rather laughable.
#46 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 672 weeks ago
johndivney wrote:Twat aside, Bh on Nightrain & Maddy r prob the two greatest GnR moments post-classic line-up. Sublime stuffup there w/the greatest GnR performances/songs. Such a sad waste.
Absolutely agree. He totally reinvented that solo, he didn't copy it. That's the GN'R I wanted to hear more of. And I loved the fact he changed up the Maddy solo almost every night..
Yeah he reinvented something that wasn't his to reinvent. We all wanted to hear more of that Gn'R but on original material not stuff the old band made and not so they can change the vibe of classic songs. People always say fans want to hear the classics and that's true but they sure as fuck don't want to see a bunch of new guys reinventing the old songs. Make your own songs and reinvent those.
monkeychow wrote:You can pretend stuff like Anastasia isn't good guitar if you want to, but if Axl or Izzy had sung over the same shit in 1993 we'd all be jacking off to it.
Not me. If GN'R recorded that song in 93 it would embody everything that I feared GN'R would have turned into had the original guys stayed together. I guess this is my NT solo, where I just don't understand the fascination some of you guys have with this song.
I don't buy hsi for one second and if it's true I gotta honestly ask: did you even like the origia band? I mean seriously what the fuck? Has Slash ever done anything you like. I honestly believe if Axl sang over Justin Beiber's music you'd say it's better than Slash's stuff.
#47 Re: The Sunset Strip » JJ Abrams to direct Star Wars Episode VII » 672 weeks ago
Dear god I hope they make NO reference to them being old.
What's wrong with us that we think only young people can be engaged in an interesting story?
Indiana Jones 4 would have been ok if it wasn't for the self conscious way they mention he's too old every 5 seconds.
I hope for a fresh starwars story with new ideas focused on new characters.
And if luke and han and people return then it's in rolls that's sensible to what those people would now be doing at 50.
Luke would have become a respected jedi master - maybe along the way to being a new yoda. Or maybe he went dark afterall and is the new emperor or whatever the story is. But don't have him acting 25 most of the movie then busting out quips about how he aint got it like he used to.
I'd like the story to be about new people. So it's about how you and I might go save the galaxy - if we went to see Han it might be like how you'd go see Bill Clinton or George Bush Senior or whatever to get his advice or something....but it's no longer a story about those people.
I agree 100%. I'd have no problem with Han and Luke playing integral roles just not main roles and not the action heros of the film. Also like you I'm dead set aganst Luke's character being self depricating and "out of shape" force wise. That would make no sense given like I said he's argueably the most powerful jedi ever. Han Solo on the other hand would work well with self depricating jokes about his age. His character could pull the self deprication thing off in spades. Han is campy and corny and COOL. Just don't make him THE guy saving the day.
Also just for realism.
As they say in Die Hard - how many times can the same thing happen to the same guy?
How many times is it plausible in the whole universe that Han is the guy who saves the day? I love han...but he's had his story now...work him in because he'd still be alive and in a respected position in society...but I hope it's not his kid who saves the day.
part of the problem with the prequels was that thinking - that in a universe of persons to choose from - the same 3 familys children are pivotal over many different generations to the fate of everyone. Things like making jango fett. Not logical.
This I disgaree with. Of course the prequels focused on the same group of people/family. They were prequels and they were the story of how Vader came to be. Luke was Vader's son so.... Obi-Wan was Vader's friend, Padme is Luke and Leia's mom. The Prequels had to focus on the same family and it's only one generation. Given the high status of where all these people were on the totem pole(Queen, Jedi, Sith Lord) it makes sense they are at the forefront. It's not like they were all some random people who just so happen to find themselves in situations to save the universe. As or the original trilogy Luke is the last jedi, Leia is a Princess of Alderan, both are Vader's kids so of course the story will focus on them. It has to given the force is the main character of all of this and Luke being the last Jedi and Leia herself having powers. Given their high stature in the rebellion it makes sense they'd have ahigh stature in the new films and that their kids would likely be following n their footsteps.
I'm not sure how well you know the story(that's out there) post Return of the Jedi but Han and Leia's children grow up to become Jedis and Jacen their son eventually becomes a Sith Lord. Again it's not like we're talking about an average family. We're talking about a family that began with the person(Anakin with the highest potential when it came to using the force and royalty(Queen Amidala). Chewbacca actually dies saving Han's children.
The Fett thing is kinda Die Hardish, but I feel you can get away with the others. They're not just any family, they're a family (Han's kids would still be part of the Skywalker line) where the grandfather is at the head of a dynasty. He's the right hand man in the empire. In history it's not unheard of for kids or even grand kids to be big players in those situations. On the contrary it's pretty common.
I agree. Just look at Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. as an obvious real life example. Introducing Jango Fett was such a cop out. Such an unimaginitve way to explain the origins of Boba. just another lazy effort in he prequels.
Luke is about the only force user left. Makes sense he'd play a part in the rebellion, makes sense he might end up having a relationship with his father as a consequence of that, makes sense he'd become a big player in the government after playing such a large part in winning the rebellion, makes sense any kids he has also could play significant parts later (themselves being apt in the force and having all the high level connections).
Yup.
#48 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 672 weeks ago
Bono wrote:I just don't feel it suits the vibe of the song. Nightrain is a badass rocker and Axl's voice is loaded with venom then Buckethead plays a solo that sounds like you're frolicking in a field on a sunny afternoon chasing butterflies with your girlfiend when you were 12 years old. It's too sentmental the way he plays it. I've never liked it.
I never got the love affair with
's Nightrain solo either. Another thing that tends to freak people out is that I don't get why his Madagascar solo at RIR3 was supposed to be so great.
Agreed. I never saw the greatness in it myself. Mind you am not impressed with his solo on TWAT either. Maybe this thing called feeling and tone that peope talk about is real doesn't matter how technical a guy is if you're not feeling it you're not feeling it. Some do and that's great but I don't. The two best solos on CD in my opinion are Robin's sublime mini solo in Better near the end of the song and his solo on This I love. Bucket did nothing for me in Gn'R and whatever he did on CD is completely forgettable in my opinion.
#49 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 672 weeks ago
I just don't feel it suits the vibe of the song. Nightrain is a badass rocker and Axl's voice is loaded with venom then Buckethead plays a solo that sounds like you're frolicking in a field on a sunny afternoon chasing butterflies with your girlfiend when you were 12 years old. It's too sentmental the way he plays it. I've never liked it.
#50 Re: The Sunset Strip » Daily Hot Celebrity Piece of Ass Pic of the Day Thread » 672 weeks ago
How about Catherine Taber who plays Padme in The Clone Wars annimated series. As if a voice actor is this good looking. Her eyes are a cool colour
