You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#551 Re: The Sunset Strip » House of The Dragon » 160 weeks ago
Only thing I'm going to say about this show is that it made me notice the recent trend of hiring ugly people for movie roles. Part of the "inclusiveness" no doubt.
It's like they forgot that movies are supposed to be an escape from reality, not a fucking reminder!
#552 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 160 weeks ago
There's one thing you mention here that makes me think Axl could have been open for a limited, one time type of deal reunion, and that is getting the rights to the back catalogue. If this was offered to Axl back then or at any time, I'm sure he would be either tempted or willing.
But if that was his criteria there was never any chance of that happening anyway.
What is odd about the whole thing is the nature of Slash's visit to Axl's house. Why did he throw his current band under the bus? Why would he feel the need to do that? I think there is only one answer to that question and that is for Slash to rejoin the band, with or without the other members.
Getting the lawsuits settled is obviously something you want, but I don't see Slash putting himself on the spot and groveling to Axl's housekeeper just for that.
Slash thinking he might as well be with Axl when Weiland is just as bad, that makes a lot of sense to me.
#553 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 160 weeks ago
The possible reunion in 2006 would have been no big deal as we have seen from 2016 onwards!....slash and duff would have recorded their parts as contributions and nothing else!...in fact that's what they are currently doing!....musicians from axl's command!...and live fink,bumblefoot and fortus played better chinese material!....what would the reunion have been for? ...there's nothing to stop them from writing together and we still wonder what would have come out of that ipotetic reunion?.... easy!...nothing!.... there's no music or chemistry and the reunion has postponed chinese 2 and on top of that it will be re-recorded with the dubious contributions of slash and duff!.... the success killed the group because it conditions them commercially and creatively! Axl should have buried the name guns and called his work something else!....buckethead was the right guy and wanted to drop the weight of the name!....changed the name axl could have released all the material they had and onrar to the piece of band he had!....josh freese,robin fink,tommy stinson,paul huge,pitman,dizzy reed,buckethead and axl!...that was the band!.....
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Try that translator if you can't type English.
#554 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 160 weeks ago
Slash going to Axl's house was October 2005. By the nature of that conversation there was no reunion on at that point. If Weiland and Co are talking about a reunion months before that it's because they know Slash is aiming for one. It can't be much else. If Duff was part of those conversations Slash threw him under the bus when he talked to Beta.
One thing we know for certain is that Slash did something to piss off Axl. And it was right after that early 2006 interview where Axl said he still had love for Slash. Shortly after that the Axl camp revealed what had happened in October 2005 to try and use it against Slash. Apparently in 2009 Axl was still calling Slash a cancer best avoided. He went from "still love the guy" to that.
Now whatever Slash did, it doesn't seem probable that Axl had given any hint of reunion, because why would he mess that up?
If there were rumours in the industry about an impending reunion and people start to expect it, giving him offers, and Axl is really trying to relaunch his new band, you can imagine why he is royally pissed at Slash for starting those rumors. Then the best of album falls apart because there is no way for them to agree on anything anymore.
That seems more plausible than Axl, Slash and Duff agreeing on a reunion which somehow deteriorates into Slash throwing Duff under the bus and then manage to piss off Axl to the extent he publicly calls him a cancer 3 years later. He would have to fuck his girlfriend or something for that to happen, or sue him, something he would obviously not do if any reunion was even remotely possible.
#555 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 160 weeks ago
What exactly are we basing the idea that Axl was open to a reunion in 2006 on?
If Axl wanted an apology he got it when Slash came to his house. There's no other way to interpret a man begging through the housekeeper. In his press release relating to the incident, he said he hoped Slash would live up to his words but that this proved to not be the case.
I think it is obvious Slash came to his house looking to come back in the band. Axl saw it as him just apologizing and was moving ahead with his own band. When Slash realized it had not worked, he returned back to his previous role as an "enemy", which apparently pissed Axl off to no end, feeling betrayed for a second time.
I don't see a reunion happening here. I see Slash and probably a few others angling for a reunion. If they had played it down instead, after the apology, it is possible a reunion could have happened in 07/08 when Axl's second comeback had obviously failed and Robin quit the band.
#556 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 160 weeks ago
Slash would have been on top form too. Not impressed by his playing these days.
#557 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 161 weeks ago
The connection to Checkmate and Jackie Chan needs to be explained. That can't be a mere coincidence.
#558 Re: The Garden » Current Events Thread » 161 weeks ago
Far as I can see, from a judicial standpoint, when Trump as President took home the documents to an unsecured location he in effect declassified them. Apparently they were headed for the National Archives so it doesn't sound like it could have been all that compromising, but what do I know.
For him to be charged with this smacks of lawlessness. It's like they've decided to treat him like just an ordinary citizen and everybody goes along with it.
Clinton afaik did give classified nuclear secret to China in the 90s. Goes to show it's all about who you know and what you can do for them.
#559 Re: The Sunset Strip » Anne Heche dead at 53 » 161 weeks ago
Yes probably not. These days it's hard to know what is real or true in the news picture.
#560 Re: The Sunset Strip » Anne Heche dead at 53 » 161 weeks ago
Doesn't matter if it is electric. All modern cars are run by computer chips. My mothers car wouldn't even start when there was a battery malfunction (engine is combustible) because the computer put the car into emergency mode. To fix it you had to go to the specialized Volvo dealership so they could hook it up with the right software.
If there's a computer it can be hacked, especially cars these days that are connected to the cloud.
There was a similar crash last week or something that also did not make sense. The black woman entering an intersection at 150mph (the max speed of her Mercedes). When did you ever hear about somebody doing that on purpose? Not even suicides go out like that. She was also waving her hands out the window, perhaps to try and get somebody's attention? Idk, whole thing was very weird.
With Anne Heche we have footage where she is obviously alive with no apparent burn marks while previously the authorities had said she never regained consciousness after the crash. Suspicious stuff and makes you think something else could be involved, like for example rigging her car to kill her, only it failed.
But again, why kill Anne Heche. I hear people saying she had dirt on someone or she was going to expose something. Eh, so what? They can just call her crazy and everybody will look the other way.
Ambulance footage is wack though. No reasonable explanation for that.