You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#701 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
madagas wrote:he really looks disturbed...eyes real puffy. Even the only pic we get of him getting in the car before the show, he looks depressed.
I am beginning to think this too. There was something really strange about him.
Yeah, the 2nd time I saw the NR performance, I noticed it. It's impossible to say without knowing him, but who knows, it wouldn't be the first time someone's personal issues have affected their work. If that's the case that he has something going on in his personal life.
Ali
#702 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
Ali wrote:You are grossly overestimating the impact of this performance on the US tour. I mean grossly. It will have no effect on the US tour ticket sales because this edition of RIR has received virtually no mainstream press coverage. This isn't like 2001 when MTV and RS both covered the festival and GN'R's performance. It can't hurt ticket sales if people don't hear about it from the press.
Ali
Think what you want but it has already caused people to not want to go see them when they tour the US. Just ask a few of the members here who's friends have now declined and the few members who are now reconsidering going themselves. This happend last night. You seriously think that the press isn't gonna pick up on this? Ok than.
Point out to me one mainstream US press article about ANY of sets from this edition of Rock in Rio.
Ali
#703 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
This will hurt ticket sales big time theyll be lucky to fill your local pub after this the rain excuse is in a par with they will get better after a few shows they should practice so they come out playing good from start not use the first few shows for rehearel it's a joke
No, it won't. This festival has had no mainstream press coverage here in the US. How can it affect ticket sales if people never hear of the performance? I'm sorry, I just don't buy that.
Ali
#704 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
Ok well afte reading the last ten pages I see the excuse of it raining keeps coming up. This is the last time I will harp on it but watch this clip. It rained like that for the entire show and it was NEVER used as an excuse because simply it's not valid and in reality wasn't needed. If the badest band on the planet(Gn'R) is shot down by rain well than fuck me. Bands play through rain all the time and it's a non issue. IF people continue to say "well it was raining" then they are simply looking for excuses and not willing to admit what really happend last night. It was a piss poor performance from an incredibly poorly prepared band with the least prepared of them all being the lead singer. It had NOTHING to do with the rain and if it did that is just really, really sad.
[youtube]WpFCnhbYymQ&feature=fvst[/youtube]As for the November Rain performance Axl clearly checked out. Look at him at about the 4:50 mark or so it's almost as if he's distracted by the crowd for some weird reason. The when he starts mumbling and forgetting the lyrics look at DJ's reaction. It's almost as if you can see DJ thinking to himself 'What the fuck is going on?"
Also to anyone who thinks this performance as a whole won't impact the US tour think again. If diehrad fans who saw this are now reconsidering buying tickets you really think the average Joe who saw that is gonna wanna run out and buy tickets? Not a chance in hell. This performance did not do anything to boost ticket sales but in all likelyhood hurt ticket sales. On what level that remains to be seen. Probably not a massive level but still it will have an effect.
After watching clips of the show again today I can honestly say I am shocked at how terrible it was considering the global stage. Maybe Axl think differently than we do but I think most of us would've looked at that show as a chance to make a huge statement and prepared accordingly. Well they made a huge sttement alright. Just not the one we all hoped they'd make.
You are grossly overestimating the impact of this performance on the US tour. I mean grossly. It will have no effect on the US tour ticket sales because this edition of RIR has received virtually no mainstream press coverage. This isn't like 2001 when MTV and RS both covered the festival and GN'R's performance. It can't hurt ticket sales if people don't hear about it from the press.
Ali
#705 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
See at the beginning of November Rain, at 1.15ish - he looks like he's crying or trying to fight off tears anyway...
He kinda looks like he's trying to hold it together a lot of times and looks so uncomfortable, mabye thats why he just gave up at the end
Yeah, I can actually see what you're saying. Who knows, maybe there was something going on in his personal life that was bothering him? He's had tough gigs before and never looked emotional like that.
Ali
#706 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
DCK wrote:Why we're acting so shocked and disgusted with Axl's temper tantrum seeing this is the way he's always been... No, actually, he's better now. Old Axl would have split.
RIR3...which is once a decade, can't and should not be fucked up. The rain you can't do shit with. It's there. The temper tantrums comes out of his own stupid faults. He can fuck up a few shows in the US or whatever - like Pittsburgh in 2002 or even Reading, but RIR is supposed to be golden. When you fuck up RIR, you not only fuck up GNR, you sort of fuck up history and I think we all react on that alone. That's why this is special, and Pittsburgh is Pittsburgh. Sorry for Pittsburgh, Axl is a dick, shit happens, that's what's coming to you when you go to a GNR show. Jolly good, bye bye and good luck next time. That's all fine, but you don't come to RIR singing out of tune and out of breath on top of not handling the fucking weather which WAS horrible. Yes it was. Theres's no arguing it was perhaps the worst conditions you can EVER do a show except in minus temperatures, and get this, rain in Rio is NOT like rain in London. This rain forest rain stuff. It pours. It's like a shower outdoors.
And I get that, fine, not the best conditions. Amazing they pulled it off, but you can't blame the rain on coming in half-assed with apperantly not enough preperation to follow up the legacy which is RIR. Next time maybe sing a few tunes beforehand, go thru some lyrics and be prepared you son of a bitch. And yeah, putting your heart on the line and then fucking up, it's gruesome. It's embaressing and you want to die, but he's supposed to be a professional. They have to deal with it. I wouldn't have. I would have thrown the mic down and left the stage never to return after fucking up your own songs, but he's getting paid for this stuff. Retreat is not an option.
I understand what you're saying. But, I don't know, I wasn't shocked. I'm glad he carried on with the show.
He looks bad. But been there, done that. Much better than the VMA performance which was just as big and as important and was an even bigger disaster.
But people in this thread were acting like he had never done anything like this before. That's what I didn't get. Especially when you idolized 92 era Axl, when he played RIO and threw furniture from his hotel balcony at the fans who were chanting his name. That was a dick move.
Yeah, honestly, he could have stopped the show and gave up, but he didn't. Which is as it should be, certainly. But, like you said it showed progress on his part, an increase in maturity if you will
Honestly, I think the 2002 VMA point is a good one to bring up. That wasn't a good performance on Axl's part either, yet they soldiered on until the tour was cancelled and turned in a classic performance at MSG later that year.
Ali
#707 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Live From Rock In Rio » 716 weeks ago
I thought his vocals were actually better than the 2009 Tokyo show that was towards the start of the last major cycle of touring. As far as the forgetting the lyrics thing, I think that happened during NR, and he got quiet because he was upset with himself. But, I think during "Patience" he was upset with something else and that's why he verbally expressed. I have no idea what, but that's just my gut instinct. I think because he has not been shy about expressing his displeasure with sound issues in the past.
To all the people complaining about the conditioning and vocal endurance: You must have a short memory. This will improve during the course of the tour just like it did during the last major touring cycle. I'm sure his conditioning and vocal endurance will be built up by the time the US shows start in Orlando.
Ali
#708 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2011-12 Guns n Roses Tour » 720 weeks ago
PROMO POSTER SAYS "over 2 hours of all their classic hits".....doesn't sound like a Chinese Democracy tour to me.
Well, there are no indications from the Latin American leg that this is being billed as part of the CD World Tour. But, saying that the biggest hits will be played is not the same as saying that ONLY the hits will be played - as in no to few CD songs.
Ali
#709 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2011-12 Guns n Roses Tour » 720 weeks ago
russtcb wrote:johndivney wrote:hold on a minute
with the price of admission being what it is people are more than justified to call this what it is, a money-grabbing exercise from a phony rock n roll band soiling the memory of something that was once truly special.james is right that the show by & large is a nostalgia trip, which is why people should hate on it.
You're exactly right; "People should hate on it". Do you have any clue how ridiculous that sounds?
Let me ask you this; is there ANYTHING this line up could do to make you happy? Or are you just so stuck in the 80s and 90s that you cannot move on? Because if the answer to the first question is "No" and the answer to the second question is "Yes" then why would you even waste the energy "hating on it"
And I'm so sick to death of the "money grabbing" argument. I assume all the bands you go see must play for free. The price of GN'R tickets is far less than what other acts are charging this year, so what's the problem? Even at the highest ticket price ($75) I'll be shocked if the tour breaks even. With the cost of everything to do with a show these days, $75 a ticket ain't gonna cut it to go grabbin' a ton-o-cash.
i am not stuck in the 80s & 90s. i am not the one playing 16/7 songs a night from AFD & UYI.
there is PLENTY this band could do to make me happy. recycling setlists from 25 years ago does not please me., 4 years on from the last studio album & no new songs does not make me a happy it makes me a sad panda.
the way it's being run atm however i find deeply unsettling - tho at least they've dropped any pretence of being anything other than a money grabbing nostalgia trip so i applaud that subtle, if mean-spirited, honesty.people should demonize & dismiss any artists trading on past glories in the way rock bands do. it's an ugly betrayal of the pioneering spirit of rock n roll. GnR have reduced themselves to the level of Journey & Whitesnake. there was a chance to blaze their own trail & break new ground, but that has been sacrificed due to laziness & the appeal of easy money.
you misinterpret what i mean by money-grabbing. i would have no qualms paying a lotta canoli's if it were an honest endeavor being undertaken. but any good, wholesome values walked out the door a long time ago.
this band is morally bankrupt.
only a determined volte-face will see the genuine nature of the beast reawakened. & we know that's never ever going to happen.& i hope you'll see i'm avoiding the argument of what is GnR - cause i agree with you & monkeychow & Smoking Guns with regards Axl's iconic status & i believe like that old quote from Classic Rock Axl is the one irreplaceable member of GnR.
but what GnR have become is, atm especially, an egregious affront to the ethos that founded the the institution. it's a betrayal of what was the ultimate rock n roll band to parade the way they do. it cheats the fans & it cheapens the legacy.
I'm sorry, but this "recycling setlists" and playing so many songs from AFD and UYI point as a reason to hate on the band is absolutely asinine. Why? Because there is a large portion of the concert attending audience that wants to see the classics/hits played live. The reason GN'R play "November Rain", "You Could Be Mine", "Sweet Child O' Mine" and "Paradise City" is the same reason that when you go to see Metallica, you will see them play "Enter Sandman", "One", and "Sad But True". When I saw U2 a few months, they played "One", "Where The Streets Have No Name", "Mysterious Ways", and "Beautiful Day" for the same reasons. It's a no win situation for the bands. If they play the hits, there will be individuals like yourself that will criticize them and make comparisons to Journey and the like. If they don't, there will be a large number of concert-goers that will be irritated they did not get to hear the classic hits.
That is a horseshit point to harp on. Be a Debbie Downer if you want, bu that argument is weak, period.
Ali
#710 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2011-12 Guns n Roses Tour » 722 weeks ago
See, that information is entirely too specific to be some random rumor. The 2006 tour also started in late October in FL. Yeah, I think this is probably one of the opening dates of the tour. Seems like the Latin America shows will be a nice series of warmup shows to get the band back in the groove for the US.
Ali