You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#701 Re: Guns N' Roses » What does a reunion mean for Axl's Vault? » 481 weeks ago
1. if anybody can make Axl releasing new (or slightly older but reworked) stuff, it's probably Slash and Duff and nobody else.
2. really hard to say what exactly will happen now. because in fact anything can happen.
#702 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 481 weeks ago
I wonder, REALLY wonder, how ChiDem and Better sounded like.
#703 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Guns N Roses member Melissa Reese » 481 weeks ago
yup, why not. actually her ties with Brain and Buckethead only support the "big GNR family" thing, regardless if it really exists nowadays.
#704 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES: Hundreds Of Fans Line Up At Old Tower Records Location » 482 weeks ago
reportedly only about 160 tickets have finally actually been given out to fans waiting in the line. the rest was already given to some VIPs.
#705 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2016 Summer Stadium 'Not In This Lifetime' Tour » 482 weeks ago
I must say I like the name of the tour 
#706 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 482 weeks ago
zombux wrote:so what's the point of selling people tickets like hell, because they want to see their first "reunion" show and then a few days before it all starts, having the actual first show that almost nobody can see? what a slap in the face. Pitman was right - money grab.
Exactly! The real fans and die hards get Vegas. But the Kardashians and friends and family get a 500 person show? That is a big fuck you. If they didn't announce Vegas as THE first show than I would have no issues. The fact Faldor's brain cannot comprehend that pisses me off some. There is only one first show in 23 years, and it looks like it will be in LA for the elite or lucky and not Vegas for the 40,000 paying fans over 2 nights.
+1 to this. I'd have absolutly no problem with a warmup club show, if it was announced together with Vegas, that would be totally fair to fans. the way they did it now means the fans are screwed. but hey, they already bought the tickets, so fuck them, I get it perfectly.
#707 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 482 weeks ago
so what's the point of selling people tickets like hell, because they want to see their first "reunion" show and then a few days before it all starts, having the actual first show that almost nobody can see? what a slap in the face. Pitman was right - money grab.
#708 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 482 weeks ago
Yes! A new song will ease the assfuck they just gave me by playing another first show in 23 years
money grab for the third time in a row - 300% success and profits and shit.
#709 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 482 weeks ago
so first they announce Coachella and fans pay outrageous prices for the tickets, because they want to see their first "regroup" shows. then they announce Vegas BEFORE Coachella and fans AGAIN pay outrageous prices for the tickets, because they think this is their first show. now, they would have ANOTHER show before all those, to drain even more money from fans. how did Pitman say it, money grab? that fits well for this, I must say!
#710 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 482 weeks ago
nah, I strongly disagree! the 2006 lineup was absolutely great on its own. why would one mess it with Slash and Duff? because of nostalgia? pfff!
