You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#81 Re: Guns N' Roses » LEAKS THREAD » 367 weeks ago
When I have the link in hand, I usually send PM to anyone who asks here, if that does not harm anyone. But it's also weird because I never know if someone has already sent it to that person.
And hey, I practically do not have contacts, I'm new to the forum. What I do is search soundcloud, youtube, forums and social networks. I use the search tools and sometimes encounter, so I'm not saying not to ask PM, I'm just saying there is also the possibility find yourself.
#82 Re: Guns N' Roses » LEAKS THREAD » 367 weeks ago
And the end?
http://rob8151.blogspot.com
Edit.
I found it now and found it interesting, but I knew I had seen very similar pictures and wondered if it was coincidence that he photographed the TV at the same time.
Well, according to a forum, it's fake and the photos are from photographer Robert John who recorded the show.
I know it's 2011, but when I saw it I thought there might be some connection.
#83 Re: Guns N' Roses » Welcome to the Jungle Sound City now streaming » 368 weeks ago
One day I hope to be able to organize with a good level of reliability the origin and characteristics of these versions that I have. When I started to download, I had no criteria. Now, even though I've organized a few things, it's still a mess. I have several different files that end up being the same and I do not even know the source. Lol
Edit.
More about WTTJ. I am close to the people of this forum, but can we say that there are three demos that we all have?
#84 Re: Guns N' Roses » Welcome to the Jungle Sound City now streaming » 368 weeks ago
I thought it was powerful.
I want to review some of the demos we already have to see if there is a significant difference between them and this reworked one.
#85 Re: Guns N' Roses » Silkworms - General discussion and Rumors » 368 weeks ago
undu wrote:Is it okay to post links here?
better through PM if somebody asks for them. rats are here.
I sent some PM. I do not know who is reliable or not, so even by PM I was a little unsure. Not because of the paranoia, but because I wanted to keep the links alive for anyone who likes the band and wants to listen. This is cool.
#86 Re: Guns N' Roses » Silkworms - General discussion and Rumors » 368 weeks ago
A juicy PM for me, please, sir.
#87 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR soundchecks Slither » 368 weeks ago
Shadow played!
A different time in some verses, but I liked it.
#88 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR soundchecks Slither » 368 weeks ago
The part where Axl is using the bass voice sounded pretty cool in this version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71JOYDTafcg
#89 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR soundchecks Slither » 368 weeks ago
If you expect mid-50s Axl to sound like 20s Axl, or 40s for that matter, you are fooling yourself. It’s not Mick’s voice. Totally different dynamic.
Would you rather he retire?
What I most hope is that he will be well and healthy without getting hurt.
However, if it is possible to do something to become better, well, that would be cool.
Anyway, live shows are insane when you're there, even if it does not reflect on recordings.
#90 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR soundchecks Slither » 368 weeks ago
I do not get angry at this, maybe the feeling is of concern.
I do not like to talk about it, Axl is the best for me, he may not always be stable, but as long as he's okay, he'll be the best.
However, what could maintain stability? Shows with shorter duration? Better fitness? Development of new vocal techniques? Surgery on the vocal cords?
I'm just talking about it... I know we do not have the information and therefore we do not have deep considerations to make.