You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#931 Re: Guns N' Roses » gunsnroses.com (Merch store now open, SALE!) » 686 weeks ago

Gotta say I pretty much enjoy GN'R too.

#932 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNREVO HOF tribute to Guns N' Roses. » 686 weeks ago

Axl's rants prior to Jungle and DTJ usually set him on the mood to the song and influenced the performance.

That's one of the things I miss the most about the rants nowadays: the lack of anger with the performance afterwards.

#933 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNREVO HOF tribute to Guns N' Roses. » 686 weeks ago

Furbush wrote:
smoke wrote:

What is that? That ain't Axl singing.

He's singing backing vocals, man... And wikipedia says this shit came out in '96...

True! It was released in Japan in 96.

The cd I have dates (c) 1998, but it should be because that's the date it was released here in Brazil.

#934 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNREVO HOF tribute to Guns N' Roses. » 686 weeks ago

That's Outpatience, West Arkeen's band.

Axl sings background vocals and some really high pitched screams!

#935 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNREVO HOF tribute to Guns N' Roses. » 686 weeks ago

The last known recording featuring Axl and Slash.

1998.

#936 Re: Guns N' Roses » gunsnroses.com (Merch store now open, SALE!) » 686 weeks ago

Meanwhile on the official Twitter:

Guns N' Roses
Attention Nightrain members. Here is the fan club t-shirt!

427939_10150787882873069_10901008068_9645923_570801775_n.jpg

THAT one I'd like...

No word on when and how... People are complaining they're receiving different designs, even ones from the Illusions era.

#937 Re: Guns N' Roses » gunsnroses.com (Merch store now open, SALE!) » 686 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:

Here's my thing. They could have given out literally ANYTHING but an AFD shirt and had room to spin it.

It honestly would've been better to just have left a shirt out if the AFD one was all they had to give. I almost bought that CD Gift Set just to get the stuff in it so I would've been let down, but not flat out mad like I am over the AFD shirt.

The best part is that people on htgth are going on about how this isn't GN'R's fault. They're finding a way to put it on GroundCTRL. Make no mistake, that company is passing out exactly what they were given by GN'R "management". What else could be the case? They went to Hot Topic and got a smokin' deal on AFD shirts and decided to hand them out as exclusives?

I really believe that what happened here is that "management" looked at what was laying around, threw it all in a box and said "fuck it, unload it on the die-hards, they'll eat this shit up". Now they're caught, as evidenced on the official forum and probably won't do anything about it.

I've never believed that the Lebeis' ever actually liked GN'R fans and to me, treatment like this makes it obvious. And if you ask me, it goes to show that they don't really care about Axl or his vision. Why on Earth would they think it's ok to pass out shirts with the likeness of 5 guys (one of which being 'The Cancer') who Axl has such a thing against?

To me this answer is plain and simple: they just don't give a shit about anything except that the money is coming in. What a shame.

Also, to add fuel to the fire, all 80's/90's designs are still under the old contract agreement, so Slash and Duff would actually have to RECEIVE money from these merchs.

Lame ass management, if you ask me.

Axl should go all St Louis on it: "Thanks to the lame ass management, I'm going home!" pwerfk (sound of mike on the floor) 16

Now seriously: shame on the Lebeis for letting this happen, shame on Axl for letting the Lebeis manage him and a worldwide brand such as GnR with such a disregard.

Go back to Azoff and reunite, for Christ's sake! You're starting to LITERALLY rub the name on mud|shit|whatever floats your boat.

#938 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 686 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

You look at the build up to it, Slash giving Axl finished songs and telling him to put lyrics and vocals on it (this also goes back to the power struggle between them when he first joined GN'R and Axl said Slash put in his demo tape from Road Crew and said to play on that)

Axl said on the chats that Slash presented the songs COMPLETED, lyrics and melodies and that Axl should recored 'em that way or leave 'em to Snakepit.

#939 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Made In Stoke to appear on HDNet » 687 weeks ago

I don't like the way Myles turns EVERY gnr song into sing along but Slash rocks playing the old songs.

#940 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash in CD sessions 2001? Illusions reunion in 96? » 687 weeks ago

Bono wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:
ottosporteman wrote:

In my opinion Axl has one big problem: GNR as it is today has so many faces to the casual audience.

In old Guns it was Axl, Slash and Duff. Izzy was never on the spotlight, drummers were never a point of concern to the average Joe.

In new Guns you had Moby. Then Chris Vrenna. Then An ever growing liat of guitar players that were enlisted but never even became members of the band but milked on the publicity GNR gave 'em. Then Tommy. Finck. Years of silence and the Buckethead. Finck again. Fortus. Bumblefoot. (i wont be numbering drummers and kb players for the sake of argument but you get the point). Ashba.

I think the opposite. The band didn't have enough faces. The out-of-the-loop guys who can't talk about anything and didn't have (don't have) the chance to show their talent with new music will never be recognized. Never. A mask and a yellow rain coat will only make you a weirdo and not a legend, if that's all you can give to the public, for whatever reasons (Axl tongue).
Randy Rhoads became Randy Rhoads and Zakk Wylde became Zakk Wylde cause they wrote helluva new stuff. Not because they played Iommi's stuff better or worse for 2 decades.

ottosporteman wrote:

That's the main problem, people cannot relate to a Guns N Roses anymore, just to Axl.

I see two solutions: assume Axl is GnR and do not try to sell a band image
Or
Negotiate long term commitment to release and touring and set what is GNR to a five men lineup, with others being Teddies, Tracies and Robertas as in additional touring musicians.

Something like this:
Guns N' Roses is Axl, Tommy, Ashba, Bumble and Ferrer. On tour we're joined by pittman, reed and fortus.

The problem is the lack of new music. Period. The fact that they are employees who are too afraid to talk about anything (and Axl barely talks - if he does, it often makes things worse or just a vague, double' talkin' bullshit), just makes it even worse. Axl can send out band pictures with every press release, it won't change anything.
They can cry as much they want about people still associate Slash with Guns N' Roses - hell, it'll always be the case. The guy just did too much great music to be forgotten. Write and release a shitload of quality new music and even other people will be associated with Guns N' Roses. Then we'd have two or more eras in the band's career, just like Ozzy had a Black Sabbath era with Tommi, an early solo era with mostly Randy and a long solo era with Zakk.
But in GN'R's case it's the Live Era with Slash, then the Dead Era, and now we're in the Zombie era with 70-80 percent of the material they play live is still written by Slash, Duff and Izzy. What a joke. And Axl is crying about Slash's image being associated with GN'R too much? Wake up, you're making it worse every night.
Man up, write and release new music, then play it instead of 75 percent of AFD and a growing percent of UYI. Choose new covers if needed, but not the ones people associate with classic GN'R. Don't live in the past, don't try to sell that it's the same band, just 'some players changed'. Live in the present and work, work, work. You still have a few years to prove your and your new new band's worth.

There is NOTHING else to say. Mikka just said it all and nailed it.  22

EXACTLY.

Without music being RELEASED, no line-up or new chapter will be even mentioned on the history books.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB