You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#21 Re: Guns N' Roses » Just say no to corporate cash grabs » 490 weeks ago

Yes. Apparently Axl, Slash and Duff can't write a song without him.

It's ridiculous imo.

#22 Re: Guns N' Roses » Just say no to corporate cash grabs » 490 weeks ago

Izzy benefits greatly from the sort of eulogising and myth making normally reserved for dead artists. I think it's a result of the fact that he's so low-key, he might as well be with Cobain.

#23 Re: Guns N' Roses » Just say no to corporate cash grabs » 490 weeks ago

Because Izzy's material is so great without the others! It is statements like that, that make him overrated. They elevated each other. It's not like Izzy is blazing a trail without them.

#24 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 491 weeks ago

I don't see the confusion. It doesn't matter how long Dizzy has been there, not all relationships are equal. And he wasn't on AfD. He's in the same boat as Matt and Gilby.

#25 Re: Guns N' Roses » Steven Tyler says that he has been working on the return of GN'R » 491 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

But I remember when Axl said in 2002 someone booked a tour without him knowing, and I remember when he went on the trunk TV show and was told about it 30 mins prior.

Seems people kind of make plans in secret, then just wing it and run it past Axl when he seems to be in a good mood. Which might work I guess....but it's a shame when you think how this could be handled....

There's also the dvd issues, as well as other stuff.

This is what confuses me about the Axl/TB relationship. Who is really in charge? I can not imagine Metallica's management, booking tours and interviews without Lars and James knowing. Lars in particular, is very much in control of Metallica. Yet with GNR, at times there seems to be a "Deep State" type of situation. Well I do remember when the name "Team Brazil" got questioned by fans, and it was said, the name doesn't just refer to the Lebis family, but to others who keep the GNR machine going.

#26 Re: Guns N' Roses » TOMMY STINSON: Classic GN'R Reunion 'Will BeHealing Thing' For Them" » 491 weeks ago

Does anyone remember the rumour about some nuGNR members banding together and negotiating as a block, to strengthen their position with management? If one left, they would all walk. Thus putting Axl and TB in a bind with having to replace numerous members.

I first read about it during an issue with DJ. IIRC Bumble was among, but tbh, I never paid much attention to nuGNR. I'd pop in and out for news every now and then, so I don't know who was in the group.

But it's interesting that these three have left at such a convenient time. When you think about it, they were the three whose position was the most precarious to a reunion.

I don't believe that Slash and Duff coming back was just down to timing. I doubt we'll really know what truly went on behind the scenes.

#27 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Twitter Updates » 491 weeks ago

A Private Eye wrote:

I can see it being very much played down and joked about on stage. Wouldn't surprise me if we just got Axl saying 'let me introduce the new guitarist, you may have heard of him' kind of thing.

Not expecting chapter and verse, on stage at least.

Yeah, I don't think they'll address it head on. They'll be jokes, a general commentary around "brothers fight", and blame thrown towards 3rd party meddling. Which to be fair, is not completely wrong. I'm sure you could write a book solely about the hanger-ons and from back then.

#28 Re: Guns N' Roses » All 3 recent Rock Deaths have very strong ties to Slash » 493 weeks ago

Yeah, I thought this too. David dated Slash's mother for some time, so he was Slash's step-dad for a while.

Tough few months for him.

When Scott died, I thought, that could've been Slash. As a fan, I'm very glad he got clean. I'm sure he is too, as is Axl. Even though Axl said it didn't matter if one of them died before making amends, I'm sure he's glad that wasn't the case. It would have been sad.

I was watching his speech at Lemmy's funeral and thinking, in all of the Axl vs Slash arguments, people forget they're just people. Slash was so cut up. People forget he and Axl are just two guys, who ultimately care for one another, but have a complicated deep relationship. They're not two sports teams vying for the title, which is how fans can treat them.

I reckon they're both glad they've reconciled.

#29 Re: Guns N' Roses » Salon Reunion article » 493 weeks ago

Axlin16 wrote:

The only way your theory works is if Axl (who has openly spoke of his disdain of the UYI period), simply doesn't want Gilby or Matt there because he just does not want to relive or tribute the UYI period.

umm, that is exactly my point. I made no mention of the music being bad. Axl may not want anyone from the UYI line-up, because he felt ganged-up on and doesn't want to relive that time.

Axlin16 wrote:

How does Dave Kushner make sense for the future of Guns? Nobody outside of VR fanboys know who the fuck Dave Kushner even is.

It doesn't matter who recognises Dave. Slash preferred writing with Kush. So if GNR wants to have a future beyond nostalgia, Kush would be the better writing partner than Gilby. Especially considering Axl has already rejected Gilby's writing efforts.

It's pretty simple, though I don't expect Dave to even be there.

#30 Re: Guns N' Roses » Salon Reunion article » 493 weeks ago

Kush makes sense for the same reasons that Frank and Fortus do. In a three guitar line-up, if Axl does not want Gilby, for whatever reason, then Kush becomes the obvious choice. Just because Slash is friendly with Gilby, doesn't mean he wants to play with him in Guns. It's not a slumber party where people are invited because they're friends. Plus, if they're looking for GNR to have a future, Kush is the better option.

Also, Gilby and Fortus have too much of the same look. It's better to have just one Izzy lookalike in the band.

faldor wrote:

If it was all about nostalgia then I can't think of a reason for Gilby to not be involved. Last I knew, he and Axl were on decent terms. Steven and Matt could be a different story.

Axl may not want to revisit the UYI line-up, because he felt they ganged-up on him. Though Kush is from VR, he may be considered more neutral, because he wasn't involved in those issues.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB