You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#581 Re: Guns N' Roses » A general lawsuit info thread » 896 weeks ago

"Are you listening to me, mister security man?" *THUD*

Like any lawsuit, this one will drag on for some time. A trial date has been set, and if it should happen, expect a verdict October.


05/16/2008 at 08:30 am in department NCBB at 300 East Olive, Burbank, CA 91502
Motion to Strike (PORTIONS OF PLTFF'S SECOND AMENDEDCOMPLAINT)

09/19/2008 at 08:45 am in department NCGD at 600 East Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206
Crash Settlement Conference (FSC: 10-09-08, NC-BJ/t: 10-20-08)

10/09/2008 at 08:30 am in department NCBB at 300 East Olive, Burbank, CA 91502
Final Status Conference (JURY TRIAL SET ON OCTOBER 20, 2008CRASH 9-19-08)

10/20/2008 at 08:30 am in department NCBB at 300 East Olive, Burbank, CA 91502
Jury Trial (EST. 5 DAYS)

#582 Re: Guns N' Roses » Classic Rock just through my door... » 896 weeks ago

Good thinking, CC.

Steven was just finishing a South American tour with Adler's Appetite mk. II. Don't know what Gilby (or Izzy) was doing, but based on that, I'd suspect we would've gotten the UYI lineup.

#583 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Classic Rock - And the new Velvet Revolver frontman is… » 896 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:
Pride&Glory wrote:

From that list.. Shooter Jennings I would pick.

I agree, and I still laugh when I see Cornell get added to these lists.

Cornell should make a public statement saying he has no interest so the speculation regarding him is halted.

"If he wanted to sing for a band outside of Soundgarden I would play with him in a heartbeat." - Slash, 07/11/97


"[Sebastian] did some amazing fantastic stuff on [the music we gave him to record vocals over] and you know he's an old friend of ours and I love the guy dearly," Duff said. "The problems we ran up against is, it's kind of with Baz, we sounded like SKID ROW, and we don't want to go down that [road]... We're forging forward, you know, [and] we want to try to break some new ground. That doesn't mean that we want to be industrial or modern rock... we just want to be something new, and this whole time, we've kept current with music. I mean, some of my best friends are the [guys from] QUEENS OF THE STONE AGE, or [JANE'S ADDICTION's Dave] Navarro, or [AUDIOSLAVE's] Chris Cornell... you know, these are guys who have gone on and moved forward, and that's something that we are doing [with VELVET REVOLVER]." - 07/01/03


So you know, Slash likely still loves Cornell's style, and the man's good friends with Duff. They'd probably love to have Cornell in the band, and its more about him agreeing to do it. So whenever there's a chance, Cornell will get namedropped. The same way GNR reunion gets mentioned every now and then.

#584 Re: Guns N' Roses » Classic Rock just through my door... » 896 weeks ago

Locomotive98 wrote:
elmir wrote:
Locomotive98 wrote:

I don't think Slash and Duff badmouth Axl to the press really.

are you serious?
almost every single interview from 97 onwards from those two was about Axl bashing.....they've cooled off recently, so they're a bit more democratic, but they were taking some serious shots at him for years...mind you, so was he, but they were pretty serious...

i'm sure sic. could locate some of the "best" moments from their interviews...

Cool, I look forward to reading what they had to say. I'm sure a lot of it wasn't direct bashing just some home truths.

Well, a little bit of historical facts first. On 12/31/95, Axl became the sole proprietor of the GNR name, brand and the musical partnership and the other members were demoted into hired employees. This piece of the puzzle has been unveiled only in the recent years, yet the way Duff and Slash have expressed their side of the story in the press through several years has alluded that the three-fold partnership formed in '92 was still in effect at the time their resignations. So keep in mind that whenever they say something to the effect of 'Axl turned the band into a dictatorship', he was exercising his legal right to enforce certain decisions over the band. Whether these decisions were in the best interests of any lineup is a different matter.

In a 1995 interview for a TV show in Paris, Slash spoke at length about how there was a pretty severe communication breakdown between him and Rose, and how he couldn't stomach working with Paul Huge, the rhythm guitarist Axl had just brought in to replace Izzy Stradlin. "The main trouble with Axl is that he always thinks a Guns N' Roses album is automatically a solo album for him," he remarked at one point. A year later, in September 1996, Duff McKagan - newly clean and sober - and Matt Sorum were also facing the same TV cameras.

[...]"All lead singers are egomaniacs," said Duff. "But hey, you need 'em. What more can I say?"

[...] In one of the few significant interviews he's granted in 1997, Slash admitted: "Axl and I have just not been able to have a meeting of the minds of such that we can actually work together. My basic plan is to wait, let the smoke clear, and maybe we can talk about it later.... Axl's whole visionary style - as far as input in Guns N' Roses - is completely different from mine. I just like to play guitar, as opposed to presenting an image." (Who's Afraid of Axl Rose, Icon Magazine, 10/97)



Showbizz: After the N.O tour, the press started to hear problems about the relationship between the GNR members. What really happened?

Duff: Slash got sick an tired and said: " Fu** off the band!". He and Axl didn't talk with each other anymore. They were always talking with each other through me - it was like being between two kids. After Axl wanted to fire Matt but I said: "We're a band and the majority must decide. You're pissed off because Matt said you're wrong".

S: Wrong about what?

D: About Axl's delay to record the next album. The group turned into an authoritarian thing - there was only Axl's opinion. They offered us lots of money to go to Europe but I thought: "Wait, I never was into it because of the money. Why would I do it now? I have a house a car and I'm fine". I had a dinner with Axl and said: "Man, the things are beyond the limits. I don't want to play to a commandant." (Duff, Showbizz, 06/99)


"Hard Force: After you finished the tour with NO, the medias started to talk about line-up problems in Guns N' Roses. Was this the beginning of the band's downfall?
Duff: Everything started when Slash turned his back and said : « This is shit. » [referring to their musical differences.] He and Axl didn't talk to each other anymore. It had become quite irrational.

Hard Force: The communication between them?
Duff: Yes. I was always in the middle, the one both came to see, and I got the impression I arbitrated little kids' quarrels. Matt was never a full member of the band, he was on an ejector seat and Axl said : « I'm gonna fire him. » I answered that this decision required more than one person to be taken since we were a band, that he alone didn't own the majority. All of this because Matt told him he was wrong. The truth is, Matt was right, and Axl wrong indeed.

Hard Force: Wrong about what?
Duff: About schedules and the way Axl was late for the next album. Susan, my girlfriend, was pregnant. We were going to have a baby, but this band was becoming a dictatorship, everything had to get done in Axl's way or it wouldn't get done at all. It wasn't like that when we started out. At one point, we were offered a huge sum of money to play a concert in Germany. I thought : « I never played for money and I'm not gonna start now! ». I've got a house, I'm secure financially.
" - Duff, 1999

"I was offered a lot of money to stay in Guns N' Roses, and I was very honored by that. But I realized that I had never gotten into making music for the money in the first place, so why should I start doing money for things now?" - Duff, 1999

"Post-Neurotic was the worst moment of my career in Guns. I went out for dinner with Axl and I told him : « Enough is enough. This band is a dictatorship and I don't see myself playing in those conditions. Find someone else. »" - Duff, 1999

"Actually nobody could fire somebody in that band, because everyone was the equal partner. I quit. I left the band two weeks before my daughter Grace (she is two now) was born [August 27th 1997]. It was not fun. That's the reason. The reason why I stayed in the band was to be a bridge between Axl and Slash. That's what I stick to. But I didn't want to stay there, cause that's not GN'R any more. There were only three guys left. What they want us to do? Me and AXL release the album as GN'R?

[...]

I was trying real hard. I have been sober since around '94 and I thought we could do better when I recall and analyze. Me and Axl were getting along well and we had very good conversation. Three of us could keep doing together. There was no doubt about it. There was no progress though. And it came to the end without facing and shaking hands saying "What the fuck were we doing?"

Everybody was trying to persuade me to stay in the band for money. I didn't want to stay the band. It was not good as it used be. It won't go well. Only three guys, not five. And Axl wanted to do something else. He didn't know what he was doing. I don't want to repeat what he said on MTV. If I do, it would be his
advantage. Music wise, he was invaded completely by guys his brought. He brought a guy and said "He is our new guitar player." I said "What a fuck?" That's not right. That's same thing I bring a guy and say "He is a new member." There was no democracy. Slash started to take it seriously said "Fuck it. Is that his
band? Since when?" That's ridiculous.

Even if I went to rehearsal at nine at night, Axl shows up at four or five in the next morning for about two years. I could not keep up with the schedule. There was no respect for me. That's enough, so I quit. I went to dinner with Axl and his manager. He was a manager of GN'R and still Axl's. I said "Axl, We had very [much] fun together, but it's your own band now. I'm not interested in you as a dictator. I didn't come here to talk about the money advanced for next record. You can have it. See Ya." That's it." (Duff, Burrn Magazine, 12/99)



"When you left the band, how did it all happen? You said you were out, you said you needed to talk?

Yeah, just talk, sit down and talk. I told them I had changed. I said if they needed help, they could just call me. I told Axl this was his band, he had ignored everyone and had hired his best friend for the band. I couldn't play with him. Paul Huge, that was the guy! He's a friend of Axl, he's a 'yes man'.


Why couldn't you play with him?

Man, you can't be in Guns N' Roses just like that. That was a real band. Do you play guitar?

No.

Well, imagine you and I grow up together and you're my best friend. OK, I'm in Guns N' Roses and I tell the rest you're going to join the band. "OK, Slash, Axl, Matt, guys, this guy is in the band". "Duff, you got a minute?" "No, he's in the band" "Well, no. Everyone in the band has to vote it, Duff, so no way!" "Fuck you, this guy is in the band! I'm not doing anything unless this guy is in the band" "OK, you know what? We'll try and play with him, since you're that much interested in it. Hey Duff, the guy can't play" "I don't care" "Well that's not very reasonable."

"I don't care" At that point, what would you do? I came to a point where I couldn't even look at him (Paul Huge). If I were in such a situation, if I were the friend joining the band, I'd say "Hey guys, you've done very good yourselves alone, I'm not going any further. Hey, Duff, thanks for the offer, but I'm breaking your band." But he didn't say it." (Duff, Popular 1, 07/00)



Slash talks about the breakup


Slash on Axl in Letterman


There are numerous other quotes but my archives sort of fail me. Basically, Slash was the one who kept saying he's willing to return to GNR whenever Axl "comes back to his senses" and Duff also started out very diplomatic. When Axl started to get around with his new band, S&D both started to become more openly aggressive on Axl and his decisions over the band. Things have cooled down since the advent of Velvet Revolver; the time between Contraband and Libertad was probably the moment where they had a Led Zeppelin-style rethink over things, and things with Weiland weren't exactly going their way.

A reunion for at least for some one-off shows was likely in the cards in late '05, when Universal was prepping the release of Welcome to the Jungle: The Very Best of GNR, a dualdisc release with a greatly improved track listing over GH. Slash commented on the situation via Ross Halfin, quite possibly to use the fanbase as a bargaining chip on Axl. Halfin even let the cat out of the bag by mentioning the original lineup should be appearing at the '06 Download festival. Slash was all smiles by then, saying that Axl was  genius, CD should be great, etc. Somehow, Axl got pissed again and released his statement on Slash's visit to his house in early '06, which effectively killed the mood. But it was a Weiland situation, no question. VR were spinning their wheels and Slash & Duff got interested on the possibility of joining forces with Axl.

#585 Re: The Garden » S.O.P.H.I.E » 896 weeks ago

Sophie Lancaster is a modern-day martyr for the Goth subculture, yet the circumstances leading to her death check pretty much all the boxes of any non-provoked hate crime. It's a sad thing that even the 21st century generation of the Western world hasn't completely come to terms with people who differ from themselves. Even if one wouldn't let one bad apple spoil the whole damn bunch, Sophie had a life going for herself, a life which was taken away for no reason. Hopefully the UK officials won't resort to Thatcherism by suggesting this is an isolated incident and has no resonance on a larger scale, and will take steps to send out a signal that there may be some serious problems bubbling under in various youth factions, which will be dealt with accordingly to prevent any further tragedies.

If there could be one good thing found in the death of Sophie, raising awareness on the problem that contributed to her death would be it. However, we only have one life to part with, and in all honesty I doubt the powers that be would stand up the way they should just for her, as they've had an ample amount of opportunities to do so earlier on, with or without unnecessary bloodshed splattered across the headlines.

#586 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR issue statement about Robin » 896 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

If Andy Wallace is the mixer that could be what they're talking about. Sometimes his mixing sounds fuzzy. He's more of a raw rock producer, which struck me as odd as why something so well produced and pristine as the demos production quality (which is awesome, btw) that Axl would choose Andy to mix it.

Wallace may be only doing certain songs, or has only done some tryouts in order for Axl to determine whether he'd be a suitable candidate for the job. Considering that Axl has a major crush on Dave Grohl (as the drum track on CD states), it wouldn't be  a stretch to imagine the Nevermind mixer is asked to take a stab at the title track, possibly among others.

Aussie wrote:

With all the money sunk into this album and masses of rented gear etc etc (according to the Zutaut interview), surely they could have afforded a guitar tech to tune the guys bloody guitar before he starts playing?

As a matter of fact...

Guitar technicians earned about $6,000 per month, while the album's main engineer was paid $14,000 per month and a recording software engineer was paid $25,000 a month, the document stated. - NY Times

Six grand a month gets you some shitty techs 16


Personally, I don't think its worth that much hubbub. I think Del's comments have been taken somewhat out of context.

Del wrote:

there are no plans in Guns to rewrite or re-record Robin's parts for the album. They seem fine whereas before, and this was no fault of Robin's, there were tuning issues that needed to be addressed....

The way I read it suggests his parts were replaced the last time (in '99, by Brian May) because there were "tuning issues" which weren't "fault of Robin's". Whether or not one takes Del's comments as canon here, he seems to be saying Brian May was called in the first place because Robin was unavailable to record his parts and get rid of those pesky tuning issues.

Personally, I'm still akin towards the fact that May was brought in to guest as a 'surrogate Slash', as Axl didn't have the heart to tell Robin he's uncomfortable in having the Finckster as the sole leading man, as his solos are distinctively different from those bluesy tunes and whether or not he can carry a whole guitar-driven album entirely on his own shoulders like Slash is debatable on the best of days.

James Lofton wrote:

Like I mentioned in a different thread, this whole saga was likely not nearly as ambitious as we had been led to believe. Instead of some masterpiece being created over a decade, the sessions were spotty, erratic at best, and would certainly explain the cycle of band member departures. Finck's gone now, and apparently there were "tuning issues"?

They should have sorted out those issues back in 1999.

While I think the "tuning issues" were indeed sorted in '99 - and have not been a recent problem - face it, whomever who's been thinking there'd be carefully crafted masterpiece hasn't read that many articles on the recording process, or is gleefully duped by the statements of Axl's personal street team (Mysteron / Del / Beta / etc.). People who were there have been going into the record for a decade saying that everything was basically splashed on the wall like a bucket of paint, to see what'd stick and how it'd come out. There are songs - good ones - but the creative process has been painstaking to say the least. One of the main reasons for the delays has been the fact that Axl hasn't been able to get a grip on what sort of album he should release.


James Lofton wrote:

Its starting to look like there wasn't nearly as much recording going on as previously thought. Like you said, this album was recorded in bits and pieces for over a decade, and you can feel the cut and paste jobs on tracks such as Better, CITR,etc.

A trilogy? Unlikely. The trilogy is probably the same sessions rerecorded on 3 separate occasions.

Say, around 60-70 tracks recorded on three separate occasions. There were always enough instrumentals, there's no doubt about it. Axl wrote and recorded vocals to the Beavan album for atleast 10-15 tracks, which would've probably rounded up a whole album. At that point in time, Axl admitted to writing the lyrics 'last', which does make sense considering the approach they had on song-writing. There's really no point in writing more than cursory lines before you have a full structure in place and remain reasonably happy about the outcome. Basically, songs weren't written. They were forged, and when Axl went 'Ok, we got a song now', he went down and did the vocal tracks. So the vocal tracks were understandably always more scarce than much labored instrumentals.

When they had a reasonable amount of 'songs' (which means a structure and a vocal track), they'd be rerecorded with a different producer and various temp mixes would be made. As for the instrumentals, the producer would likely listen to the tracks Axl'd been developing the furthest and start reworking them to different directions, rerecording and adding various bits and pieces to give a more distinctive feel to it. RTB's a kitchen-sink kinda guy, while I always found Beavan to be more low-key in various instances, so it's easy (while simplifying) to suggest it was Axl and RTB who started bringing up the orchestrations.


James Lofton wrote:

There's been rerecordings by various lineups since 1997. Its obviously not going to have the same vision he originally had in mind because he keeps adding people to it, and its people who just walked in the door not even knowing exactly what it is he really wants. At some point, the CD concept gets diluted and loses all meaning of its original intent.

He had no vision. If he could say outright, he would. You don't try out various studio musicians and sought-after session players (not to mention producers) if you have a clear-cut idea of what the record'll be like. To the credit of Sean Beavan and Paul Huge, they got Axl of his ass to bend over and do some songs - with vocal tracks - and I have a good feeling those two will one day be the unsung heroes of this saga.


Axl didn't have a clue when he started, but he might've gotten the hang of it somewhere down the line.

Rose: We've been working on, I don't know, 70 songs. [...] The record will be about, anywhere from 16 to 18 songs, but we recorded at least two albums' worth of material that is solidly recorded. But we are working on a lot more songs than that at the same time... in that way, what we're doing is exploring so, you know, you get a good idea, you save it, and then maybe you come back to it later, or maybe you get a good idea and you go, "That's really cool, but that's not what we're looking for. Okay, let's try something new." You know, basically taking the advance money for the record and actually spending it on the record. - MTV, '99

The rebuilding - and ongoing reinvention - of Guns N Roses has been a difficult and, quite obviously, slow and expensive process. Rose does point out that the expense will be less glaring if, as he expects, he gets another record out of the hours and hours of material he's committed to tape, possibly one that's even more industrial and electronica-influence than Chinese Democracy. ''I'd like to take some of the old Guns fans along with me gradually into the twenty-first century,'' he says. - RS, 00


Of course, the ideas Axl speaks for another album are probably outdated by now, as plans regarding the overall sound have quite possibly changed. However, I maintain there has been a semi-solid pool of tracks slated to appear on CD since '99. All those songs have been rerecorded and worked on. Then, there have been additional instrumental tracks, which have been worked on simultaneously, and they have tentatively been directed to further albums. If the song turns good enough (like Better), it might get a promotion and replace some CD staple on the so-called A-list. As time has passed, more instrumentals have likely gained a state in which the vocals are added. Thus the pool of songs ready for release keeps growing - more temp mixes are ordered, the cycle of Axl listening everything through and deciding on the sound keeps getting longer and longer...

#587 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR issue statement about Robin » 896 weeks ago

A Private Eye wrote:

He clearly means Mysteron's gay..... 16

Are you suggesting Ron just answered the one thing we've been debating for the last page?

"Who's Mysteron?"
"He's gay."

Not really what I was thinking but his comments are supergay, no denying.

#588 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR issue statement about Robin » 896 weeks ago

Ok boys,

Since you're all such blabbermouths, I'm changing the Mysteron/HTGTH account password and this time, I won't be sharing it with you.

#589 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR issue statement about Robin » 896 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:

one thing i remember Mysteron posting a couple years ago...he said he was working with the foo fighters for one of their albums...either the dbl disk or the one before that...

Hm.

What'll I'll be doing now is listing a few thing Mysteron's shared with the fanbase over the years. Not insinuating anything, but he can't deny them.

- 2004: Tommy's tour dates
- 2004: VR tour dates
- 2006: Hammersmith presales


Tommy was signed to Sanctuary Records at the time, so that information could've feasibly been gotten from Merck, as Mysteron seemed to have a contact with him.

VR tour dates are something Axl's cohorts don't probably send out. VR's on RCA Records, btw.

Hammersmith was, again, probably a Sanctuary/Merck tie-in.

Foo Fighters are on RCA Records.


Axl lost a lot of old friends from Geffen during the '99 merger with Interscope. 'Tis all I'm saying.

#590 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR issue statement about Robin » 896 weeks ago

Oh fer Pete's sake,

That's just the same as the idiotic propaganda people like Beta and Del have tried to force down people's throats for just a little bit too long. "GNR are infallible, the record will revolutionize the music world, no we don't have to share it with you or anyone else, least of all the crooked record company which constantly tries to compromise Axl's vision. Complaining? Fuckhead, go home!"

At what point did it become a crime to care for this band and become a bit frustrated (not necessarily squarely at Axl, more at the situation as a whole) because the record which we all want to hear just keeps shifting forward into the unknown future?  I mean, it's not like things started to happen yesterday. In '94-'96 the old band worked irregularly over a new studio LP. Based on what I've read, it would've been a toned down effort when compared to the lush and posh of the UYI's, a harder, more straight-forward rock album. Some songs on the first Snakepit album and BLS' Rose-Petalled Garden from Sonic Brew may give some indication on the overall sound. Might not be a too much stretch to describe it as OMG, only a with more bluesy sound. If the band would've gone the VR route by releasing that album and touring as a sort of kiss-off, it would've been easier for people to accept the fact that the gears had shifted. That album would've probably been criticized by now over the lack of Izzy and the perhaps more obsolete musical direction they would've experimented with, but it would've given people something to chew on during the dead years. Imagine that, in '97, a break-up of the UYI lineup after a world tour, with the CD saga beginning.

But no. The CD saga has gone on for a good decade, and if you add up the efforts of the old band, you get 17 years since the previous album. It's sickening to think that we are asked to keep a brave face come what may (while I appreciate the fact that the work has been restarted more than once; 97-'99, '00-'02, '03-), as the years we've spent biding our time as far as GNR's concerned feel no shorter. 17 years without an album, which has been on its way for at least 7 years so far. It's easy to say be cool if one was fortunate enough to be able to drive down to Axl's mansion, sit down with the master of the house and hear the latest tunes. It's also easy to feel sympathy if you know exactly what's going on with the negotiations and the album, if Axl personally puts his faith in you and tells about all the backstage shenanigans.

I'm not overtly obsessed with the wait or the album, mind you, but I have zero respect for someone like Mysteron/Beta/Del who like shout out from the ivory tower that the peasants needs be quiet fer the lieges may not otherwise enjoy their 'Prostitute'.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB