You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

Axlin16 wrote:

Yeah, anyone that has watched those videos... there's nothing sexual about it. Sure she looks good, but there's something just perverse, creepy and wrong about those videos.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

misterID wrote:

I saw stills from the video it and I couldn't make anything out but blurry boobs and her ass.

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

faldor wrote:
misterID wrote:

I saw stills from the video it and I couldn't make anything out but blurry boobs and her ass.

Apparently the 7 minute version is good quality and she looks quite good.  So I've heard.  smile  I saw the short 7 second clip, I must admit.  She does look good, but the guy definitely deserves to do some time.

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

faldor wrote:

I know this is a joke, at least I think it is.  But here's some fodder added to the conspiracy theory.

http://boston.barstoolsports.com/

CHICAGO '” ESPN reporter Erin Andrews, who was secretly videotaped nude while staying at hotels, filed a lawsuit Thursday against seven hotels and the suburban Chicago man who admitted making the tapes. Andrews'™ lawsuit alleges the hotels confirmed where Barrett was staying and gave out her room number without her permission. Andrews, who was recently a contestant on the ABC show 'Dancing with the Stars, is asking for more than $1.2 million from the hotels and Barrett for 'severe and permanent emotional distress, according to the complaint. Barrett was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison in March.

And now it comes full circle. The final piece of the Erin Andrews puzzle. I kept saying that Erin Andrews paid Michael David Barrett to be the fall guy in this whole charade. That once he got out of jail there would be 7 figures waiting in some off shore bank account. The non believers told me that I was crazy. That Erin Andrews doesn'™t have that type of money to spend on a publicity stunt. Well now we find out she'™s suing the Hotel Chain for 1.2 million (AKA '“ the exact amount the Taste Maker said Michael David Barrett would get) Come on! You have to see it now! Obviously the guy who gave out Erin'™s hotel room info was in on it! His job was to make the hotel look incompetent. I mean nobody would be that stupid to give out her room number to some random stranger.  Unless of course he was in on it.   He set up the hotel chain so EA could get the money needed to pay Michael David Barrett. It doesn'™t get more obvious than this. Bottom-line is that as I'™ve said from day 1 there is no way this could be an accident. Chicks don'™t walk around their hotel rooms with a perfectly shaved box and checking out their ass like that. Not in real life they don'™t. And even if they did Speilberg couldn'™t have made a better peephole video out of it. But now it all finally makes sense. Viva La Stool indeed!

DCK
 Rep: 207 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

DCK wrote:

I downloaded a version, but jesus...I can't see shit. It's just a blurry vision of a blonde doing her hair. You can't even see if she got nipples or not!

faldor
 Rep: 281 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

faldor wrote:

Apparently there is a pretty good quality clip out there, like 7 minutes long or something.  I haven't seen that one though.  I saw the short 10 second clip which wasn't the best of quality.

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Erin Andrews, invasion of privacy

Axlin16 wrote:

There are tons of people who walk around naked in closed doors, so the "posing" thing is a stretch. What could be deemed checking out her ass in a mirror, could just be a zit. No one knows.

This happened, and she was not in on it. BUT, when she became aware of it, it was pushed and hyped for her to try and get attention.

She might think she's a real journalist, being her father is one. But the reality is ESPN hired her for sex appeal from day fucking one. They bought her so they could push her look, ass, tits, the whole thing. And if she doesn't think that's true, well I got some ocean front property in Arizona she can buy.

I'm sure she didn't mind saying yes to that paycheck from ESPN either, knowing full well her role in the network.

No one is innocent in the media

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB