You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Barack Obama fears a 'lone wolf' extremist attack
"The most likely scenario that we have to guard against right now ends up being more of a lone wolf operation than a large, well coordinated terrorist attack," he told CNN television during a campaign-style swing through Iowa.
"We still have to stay on top of it, though. We're never letting our guard now, that's part of our job," said Mr Obama, who vowed "heightened" security measures and "extra vigilance" ahead of the grim anniversary.
He had been asked about the prospects of a terrorist attack either to mark 10 years since the strikes on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center or in retaliation for the May raid in which US commandos killed Osama bin Laden.
Mr Obama said US officials were "constantly monitoring potential risks" but said a punishing US campaign had left al-Qaeda "a much weaker organisation with much less capability than they had just two or three years ago."
"The risk is always there, and obviously on a seminal event like the tenth anniversary of 9/11, that makes us more concerned – it means we've got heightened awareness," he said.
But "the biggest concern we have right now is not the launching of a major terrorist operation – although that risk is always there."
"The risk that we're especially concerned over right now is the lone wolf terrorist, somebody with a single weapon being able to carry out wide-scale massacres of the sort we saw in Norway recently," said Obama.
He was referring to Anders Behring Breivik, who shot dead 69 people, many of them teenagers, in a July 22 rampage on the island of Utoeya after killing eight others in a bombing of government offices in Oslo.
"When you've got one person who is deranged or driven by a hateful ideology they can do a lot of damage and it's a lot harder to trace those lone wolf operators," he added.
Re: Barack Obama fears a 'lone wolf' extremist attack
The next catastrophic terrorist attack will be someone carrying a nuke in a briefcase.
Certainly a possibility but those types of nukes not very easy to build. US and Soviets had them of course but not sure how much if any progress has been made in regards to smaller countries/terrorist organizations acquiring them.
Unless you are referring to something like a "dirty bomb" or a smaller nuclear device.
In my opinion a chemical/biological attack more likely than nuclear.
