Board footer

James

 Rep: 664 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

James wrote:

Because it gives them time to come up with an excuse.

Neemo

 Rep: 485 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Neemo wrote:

Why the 4 day wait time?

to see how many pages it gets @ cd.com and how many other gnr boards it gets posted on

Communist China

 Rep: 130 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Communist China wrote:

Where is it on cd.com ? Wouldn't they just take that sort of shit down?

Neemo

 Rep: 485 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Neemo wrote:

Where is it on cd.com ? Wouldn't they just take that sort of shit down?

they just removed it

Communist China

 Rep: 130 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Communist China wrote:

Where is it on cd.com ? Wouldn't they just take that sort of shit down?

they just removed it

Well thank them for that. Can we delete our thread for it too?

Neemo

 Rep: 485 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Neemo wrote:

Where is it on cd.com ? Wouldn't they just take that sort of shit down?

they just removed it

Well thank them for that. Can we delete our thread for it too?

but what if its real?

Communist China

 Rep: 130 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Communist China wrote:

they just removed it

Well thank them for that. Can we delete our thread for it too?

but what if its real?

I'm sure the hoarder will be pissed off enough having his thread cut at cd.com to never ever release this gem of a leak. Oh well. Our loss, right?

Neemo

 Rep: 485 

Re: *LOCKED* (False till proven true) Supposed new leak???

Neemo wrote:

well i'm gonna lock this...if its "real" PM me a clip and after i listen to it i'll decide if its legit enough to reopen to discuss it

*LOCKED*