You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: September 11 2001
Jesse Ventura?
Whats he got to do with it?
Just using him as an example. He's been championing the cause that 9/11 was a government conspiracy for years now, among many other conspiracies. Point is, you could make a conspiracy out of any situation and depending on the information you're given, some could seem quite viable.
Re: September 11 2001
polluxlm wrote:Demolition the building, not possible. Blow up a few floors at the top = pulverize the building? Will also make building 7 collapse in a controlled fashion. Possible?
Ok...
You're right though, all those 9/11 theories are no good. Especially the governments version.
LOL - ok. There's absolutely no way in hell that it wouldn't have leaked by now if it was a conspiracy. 2 people couldn't have pulled it off. It would have taken way more people than could keep quiet about it and that's assuming everybody they asked to participate said yes.
Not to mention you need those hijackers to hit the targeted areas of the building where they "planted" the explosives perfectly.
Re: September 11 2001
polluxlm wrote:Demolition the building, not possible. Blow up a few floors at the top = pulverize the building? Will also make building 7 collapse in a controlled fashion. Possible?
Ok...
You're right though, all those 9/11 theories are no good. Especially the governments version.
LOL - ok. There's absolutely no way in hell that it wouldn't have leaked by now if it was a conspiracy. 2 people couldn't have pulled it off. It would have taken way more people than could keep quiet about it and that's assuming everybody they asked to participate said yes.
Doesn't change the fact that millions of tons of steel doesn't just pulverize.
Not to mention you need those hijackers to hit the targeted areas of the building where they "planted" the explosives perfectly.
What you saw on tv was a digital simulation, because it can't happen in real life. Aluminium < Steel
This is clearly CGI:
Re: September 11 2001
buzzsaw wrote:polluxlm wrote:Demolition the building, not possible. Blow up a few floors at the top = pulverize the building? Will also make building 7 collapse in a controlled fashion. Possible?
Ok...
You're right though, all those 9/11 theories are no good. Especially the governments version.
LOL - ok. There's absolutely no way in hell that it wouldn't have leaked by now if it was a conspiracy. 2 people couldn't have pulled it off. It would have taken way more people than could keep quiet about it and that's assuming everybody they asked to participate said yes.
Doesn't change the fact that millions of tons of steel doesn't just pulverize.
misterID wrote:Not to mention you need those hijackers to hit the targeted areas of the building where they "planted" the explosives perfectly.
What you saw on tv was a digital simulation, because it can't happen in real life. Aluminium < Steel
This is clearly CGI:
LOL. I suppose they manipulated the home videos too and all of the people calling into radio stations were just making things up right? Man, if you believe this was some gov't conspiracy, you will believe just about anything.
Re: September 11 2001
What you saw on tv was a digital simulation, because it can't happen in real life. Aluminium < Steel
This is clearly CGI:
To steal a line from the great comedy, "Airplane", ironically enough, "Surely, you can't be serious".
- monkeychow
- Rep: 661
Re: September 11 2001
This link explains how many of the scientific theories suggesting 911 was fake can actually be countered by other science.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
Have a look at this part: http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm
It explains in physics terms how once part of the structure was weakened by the crash the weight of the other parts and momentum caused the implosion to have something around the kinetic energy of a kiloton.
I love many of the conspiracy theories, but when you read all this stuff about how these buildings are designed, it becomes apparent that although steel is stronger than aluminium it's not stronger than something traveling at 500 miles an hour loaded with fuel hitting directly on a structure supporting incredible weights that was never designed to withstand anything of the sort.
Re: September 11 2001
I'll stay out of this one.
I will say this... I think it's disrespectful to the family members and the first responders that an actual impartial and thorough investigation that answers REAL questions about that day has yet to be done.
I've met victims family members and very sick first responders who were told that the air around ground zero was safe to breathe by the EPA who are dying and have lost everything. They ALL have lots of questions that have yet to be answered.
