You are not logged in. Please register or login.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

buzzsaw wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

When people have the health insurance, they will be more likely to goto the doctor over trivial things instead of just going when there is a broken arm. So more people now taking similar benefits, but a lot of the people couldn't really afford the insurance, so they will be subsidized by those that can. This is how you will get longer lines, shittier service, and higher costs.

Exactly.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

PaSnow wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Hahaha. Obama commands so much respect that the entire middle east region is flipping their shit right now and showing their hate for the US. This looks bad on Obama, real bad. Which is why he needs to be firm here. But some here just want to discuss Romney being a bad communicator, when does Obama get called out on the Middle East?

So we'll put in a CEO businessman & his VP elect both of whom have absolutely zero foreign affairs experience or military knowledge?!

(fwiw say what you want about Obama lacking too however Joe Biden was extremely involved in foreign affairs in his lengthy tenure as US Senator)

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

Smoking Guns wrote:

I bet his "Osama is dead and GM alive" quote went over great over there.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

misterID wrote:

E0XBw.jpg

Libyans-hold-peaceful-demonstrations-decrying-the-Benghazi-attacks-PHOTOS.jpg

enhanced-buzz-wide-27696-1347483363-5.jpg

Get your facts straight. And Egypt finally cracked down on protestors and apologized after Obama took it to their president.

Cheering for more instability in the mid east, which would create more violence and death, and applauding what's happening is disgusting, btw.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

Smoking Guns wrote:

The bad ones dominating.  The good people don't have the guns to stop them. Nobody is cheering this on.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

misterID wrote:

My ass, you're sitting there literally laughing over it, dude. And you're totally misinformed. If there was a neo-con in office do you know how terrible this would end up? Do you want another war? Because that's what Romney is proposing, another war with Iran and Syria. BTW, Libya is mainly pro US.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

Smoking Guns wrote:

Mr. ID, you show me five photos, I can give you thousands of names of dead Americans from being over there. In germany during WWII, not all Germans were bad people, but their leader was. So we get it. Bad people make the group look bad.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

buzzsaw wrote:
misterID wrote:

My ass, you're sitting there literally laughing over it, dude. And you're totally misinformed. If there was a neo-con in office do you know how terrible this would end up? Do you want another war? Because that's what Romney is proposing, another war with Iran and Syria. BTW, Libya is mainly pro US.

If another war is necessary, another war is necessary.  It's better than hiding your head in the sand and hoping it just goes away.

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

misterID wrote:

What are you gaining from these wars, buzz? How is it necessary? How is it going to be paid for? What do you want out of it?

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: Election 2012-Issue #1 labor unions/right to work states

misterID wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Mr. ID, you show me five photos, I can give you thousands of names of dead Americans from being over there. In germany during WWII, not all Germans were bad people, but their leader was. So we get it. Bad people make the group look bad.

And it was clear that your comment was completely lacking several points:

You were so gleefully happy that this would be the end for Obama that you haven't mentioned once that Mitt Romney lied through his teeth about Obama apologizing for America, which didn't happen. That he sent out a statement before he knew the facts and got it ass backwards, and didn't even understand the full situation of what was going down. Not to metion that he overreacted, jumped the gun, showed desperation, arrogance and showed that he doesn't know what he's doing... Especially now that the protests are ending and the president handled it correctly.... That is scary.

And I'll ask you, what do you gain by starting another (two) war(s)? What's the purpose? What do you want so badly over there that you're willing to sacrifice American lives and innocent civilian lives for? How are you going to pay for it? What is the timeline? What is the mission? What do you want out of the middle east that you'd sacrifice so much for? Bravado?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB