You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_co … rack_feb16
55% approval among likely voters.
Re: US Politics Thread
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_co … rack_feb16
55% approval among likely voters.
fake news
Re: US Politics Thread
Oh, and he had a very rushed Executive Order turned down by the courts.
More incompetence....should be embarrassing to not know how to write an executive order....you think he could appoint one person that isn't just there to be on camera...or someone with a actual skill set...
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
Oh, and he had a very rushed Executive Order turned down by the courts.
We'll see. Obama spent years and had his struck down. Unfortunately for you guys, the same logic the liberal justices used to support his EO, requires them to support Trump's EO too.
Re: US Politics Thread
PaSnow wrote:Oh, and he had a very rushed Executive Order turned down by the courts.
We'll see. Obama spent years and had his struck down. Unfortunately for you guys, the same logic the liberal justices used to support his EO, requires them to support Trump's EO too.
Except they did....and it had nothing to do with the merit....it was the incompetence of the person/people who wrote it....
Re: US Politics Thread
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_co … rack_feb16
55% approval among likely voters.
Even Fox news has approval at somewhere in the mid 40s...and you have to believe they tilt conservative...
keep quoting that POS Rasmussen report
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
Randall Flagg wrote:PaSnow wrote:Oh, and he had a very rushed Executive Order turned down by the courts.
We'll see. Obama spent years and had his struck down. Unfortunately for you guys, the same logic the liberal justices used to support his EO, requires them to support Trump's EO too.
Except they did....and it had nothing to do with the merit....it was the incompetence of the person/people who wrote it....
Mitch, just stop. It's obvious you don't have a clue what you're talking about. You've become nothing more than the cheering section for the other 2 or 3 posters who actually read and have at least some understanding of what's going on.
You're embarrassing yourself. Judges are the ones in robes behind a bench. They're not the people you see on that square device with all the moving colors you like. And since I know you struggle with how our form of government works, the only judges who have final say are the ones who reside in that building in D.C. The judge you went to see for waiving your dick at a small child isn't the one who dictates the power of the president.
