You are not logged in. Please register or login.

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:
slcpunk wrote:

haha, adios Milo Yiannopoulos. Guess the Alt right will have to find some new creep to be their spokesman.

He continues to have his defenders though...

What happened now?

I saw him on Bill Maher the other night. First time I had ever seen him or heard him talk. Was a really funny episode.

I think they guy is pretty transparent, but I guess he trolls those college lefties hard and they fall for it every time. I always found it weird how he squirms around and avoids eye contact like the plague when being interviewed though. 

Anyway, apparently a tape of him surfaced essentially defending sexual relations between teenage boys and grown men. CPAC dropped him immediately and his book deal was 86'd. Many conservatives seem pretty upset, while others continue to defend him.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

I haven't seen the video, but if it's really about him saying he got it on with a 29 year old guy when he was 17 and he enjoyed it... Who cares. That's not exactly condoning pedophilia. And this was started by a Reagan cult who hates gays. Like SG, Maher was the first time I ever saw/heard Milo and he's just a clever troll who likes to upset liberals. I actually agreed with some of what he said in that there is a big swath of liberals who are pretty anti free speech tight asses and about refusing to feel sorry for celebrities because someone was mean to them on the internet.

He's a bitch. That's all.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

I haven't seen the video, but if it's really about him talking about that he got it on with a 29 year old guy when he was 17 and he enjoyed it... Who cares. That's not exactly condoning pedophilia. And this was started by a Reagan cult who hates gays. Like SG, Maher was the first time I ever saw/heard Milo and he's just a clever troll who likes to upset liberals. I actually agreed with some of what he said in that there is a big swath of liberals who are pretty anti free speech tight asses and refusing to feel sorry for celebrities because someone was mean to them on the internet.

He's a bitch. That's all.

Yes. He is a troll. I found him to be entertaining. Malcolm Nance, was also on that episode. I like him but damn he has become so fucking partisan. Jesus.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:

If I were going to criticize anyone for partisanship it would be that Georgia sell-out chicken fucker who was on set. He loves fucking over farmers.

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: US Politics Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:
misterID wrote:

If I were going to criticize anyone for partisanship it would be that Georgia sell-out chicken fucker who was on set. He loves fucking over farmers.

But he is a politician. You talking about the white guy closest to Bill? 

Also the dude from Comedy Central isn't funny at all. He is annoying. Bill is a special talent. He makes me laugh even if I often disagree with him.

slcpunk
 Rep: 149 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

I haven't seen the video, but if it's really about him saying he got it on with a 29 year old guy when he was 17 and he enjoyed it... Who cares.

It wasn't solely about him.

And Try 13...

Among others:


“Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty,” he adds, dismissing the fact that 13-year-olds are children.

The notion of consent, he says, is “arbitrary and oppressive.”

Re: US Politics Thread

AtariLegend wrote:
slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

I haven't seen the video, but if it's really about him saying he got it on with a 29 year old guy when he was 17 and he enjoyed it... Who cares.

It wasn't solely about him.

And Try 13...

Among others:


“Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty,” he adds, dismissing the fact that 13-year-olds are children.

The notion of consent, he says, is “arbitrary and oppressive.”

I bet Randal defends him.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

AtariLegend wrote:
slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

I haven't seen the video, but if it's really about him saying he got it on with a 29 year old guy when he was 17 and he enjoyed it... Who cares.

It wasn't solely about him.

And Try 13...

Among others:


“Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty,” he adds, dismissing the fact that 13-year-olds are children.

The notion of consent, he says, is “arbitrary and oppressive.”

I bet Randal defends him.

Don't you have a royal family based on incest and pedophilia. Remind me, how is the U.K. A democracy when the supreme is your monarch and you need noble blood to be in half your legislature and you don't get to vote for your prime minister. I thought you'd be all over defending this since you buy into that gender nonsense too. Maybe the pedos just identify as a 5 year old, so that makes what you and your friends do ok.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:

Seems it'll push him back down into the blogging stratosphere, which ultimately seems where he belongs.  I never got this guys schtick, he's an obvious fake, just an attention seeker and would've taken it from either side, he just happened to fall into Brietbart & the alt right, so he went with that. With the Trump & Breitbart explosion he seemed to capitalize on it, and really launch into quasi-celebrity. Now he'll just get bumped down to a regular blogger/youtuber, someone like a Perez Hilton who's just kinda there, but you don't know who's reading him. He's only apologizing cause he'll miss that money lol.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:

Seems it'll push him back down into the blogging stratosphere, which ultimately seems where he belongs.  I never got this guys schtick, he's an obvious fake, just an attention seeker and would've taken it from either side, he just happened to fall into Brietbart & the alt right, so he went with that. With the Trump & Breitbart explosion he seemed to capitalize on it, and really launch into quasi-celebrity. Now he'll just get bumped down to a regular blogger/youtuber, someone like a Perez Hilton who's just kinda there, but you don't know who's reading him. He's only apologizing cause he'll miss that money lol.


He got attention because he used the left's tactics against them.  Roll out some minority who says outrageous things, but you're not supposed to attack him according to the left's mantra because he has no power.  Remember, according to the progressives, it's impossible for anyone but a white male to be discriminatory because no one besides white males have power.  It's complete nonsense, but this is a major argument in progressive circles.

Milo brought up some good points to point out the lunacy of the altar of liberalism as it pertains to trans people and how these parents letting 6 year olds go through sex reassignment are monsters, with most just being gay at the end of the day and no tangible benefit coming from reassignment surgery based on several studies. 

But he was a troll and was really only liked by doughy College Republicans in their Confederate Flag shirts.  I couldn't care less if he remains employed or not.  He really only ever debated other idiots and low hanging fruit.  He was an edge lord, and now he's paying the price for being edgy.  If only people went after Lena Dunham the way they're going after Milo.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB