You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: US Politics Thread
buzzsaw wrote:Only in looney land can someone who has never owned a gun be attacked for supporting gun rights...
Yeah ok. I never did heroin but I think it should be sold in supermarkets to kids 16 & up. Can't attack me, I said I never did heroin.
If only that was what I said...
You know one of those is legal and one of them isn't, right? You looney lefties don't historically deal well with facts.
Re: US Politics Thread
The woman in the picture I posted is a woman, imo. I see a stark difference between someone who feels in their very soul they were born the wrong gender, and some douchebag who likes to wear makeup, bitches about pronouns and who decides to be nonbinary as a middle finger to society and to daddy.
Re: US Politics Thread
Axl S wrote:I see there's still transphobia in this thread. Neat. /s
I know right? Totally ignored.
Same dude was calling for another to be banned and then writes that shit. Hypocrisy right there.
Like I said earlier, the ones bickering are all equally a sandwich short of a picnic.
Why does science matter for climate change but not for biology? I have no problem with people identifying as whatever, but I am curious why selective science is a thing...
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
It’s in the fucking DSM-6. The global standard for psychiatric evaluations and definitions. This isn’t up for debate. It’s like arguing pi isn’t 3.14 and an infinite string of numbers.
Gender isn’t real. It can’t be defined. None of you can provide an objective list of categories or characterizations that exclusively limit one gender from another. It’s a bullshit mantra parroted by those eager to pat themselves on the back as enlightened and progressive. It’s an anti- intellectual position. It is defined by its inability to be defined, so it is inherently unintelligent and meaningless due to its inherent ambiguity.
You either have an XX or XY pair of chromosomes. Men have the Y. Women lack it.
That’s not bigoted. It’s biology.
Calling others bigots because they state the nature of objective reality is a new low for this group. You should be ashamed. It’s no coincidence Mitch finds himself among you.
- IRISH OS1R1S
- Rep: 59
Re: US Politics Thread
You should probably ask for me to be banned right after you are done moving those goalposts mate.
Including me with Mitch? Nice bait. Waiting for the truther tag next.
Re: US Politics Thread
You should probably ask for me to be banned right after you are done moving those goalposts mate.
Including me with Mitch? Nice bait. Waiting for the truther tag next.
So science isn't a thing or it is? I mean I get that you can argue the psychology part, but you can't really argue the biology part. That's way more factually scientific than climate change is.
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
You should probably ask for me to be banned right after you are done moving those goalposts mate.
Including me with Mitch? Nice bait. Waiting for the truther tag next.
What goal post? What did I move. Can you explain how I was “transphobic” and define what gender is? Or are you all too eager to just vomit up trendy catch phrases to pretend there’s an iota of Intelligence to what you’re spewing?
If you link Alex Jones, believe 9/11 was an inside job, or think Trump worked with Putin over a piss tape, you’re god damn right I’ll call you a truther, because that’s what you categorize and label someone as who holds those absurd beliefs. That’s what we do with language. We use specific nomenclatures to reference very specific things. There’s a direct correlation to how effectively someone uses language and how intelligent they are. It’s clear what part of the spectrum you fall on.
“Transphobic”. Get the hell out of here.
You’re not even bothering to reply to my post with a quote. Just spreading bullshit.
- IRISH OS1R1S
- Rep: 59
Re: US Politics Thread
Ah the goalposts!
We are back-peddling to science now.
Here is the original quote:
Hard to enact something when a party wants to pretend men cutting off their dicks and thinking they’re a woman is a sane and rational action
So you don't think that is trans-phobic, disrespectful? I would imagine they would disagree.
.............but do carry on "debating" among yourselves. It sure is funny for the rest of us.
- Randall Flagg
- Rep: 139
Re: US Politics Thread
Ah the goalposts!
We are back-peddling to science now.
Here is the original quote:
Hard to enact something when a party wants to pretend men cutting off their dicks and thinking they’re a woman is a sane and rational action
So you don't think that is trans-phobic, disrespectful? I would imagine they would disagree.
.............but do carry on "debating" among yourselves. It sure is funny for the rest of us.
Yep, completely accurate, if crassly said. Cutting off your dick doesn’t make you a woman. A bunch of twitter dipshits saying the compulsion to feel you’re in the wrong body isn’t a serious mental condition, as stated in the DSM-6, doesn’t make it so.
But keep it going. You’re doing such a great job.
