You are not logged in. Please register or login.

PaSnow
 Rep: 205 

Re: US Politics Thread

PaSnow wrote:
misterID wrote:

You're comparing doxxing private citizens with a paper tombstone that says, RIP SOCIALISM?

It also has a gravestone with his running competitor Amy McGrath & Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland has passed but Amy McGrath will now have to be majorly concerned at all speeches. This is just a person 'running' for Senate, we're not talking Secret Service type level of security.

And it was posted on Saturday, hours after the Walmart shooting.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
misterID wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
misterID wrote:

That's absurd. These people are empty, damaged individuals, their politics is irrelevant, they'd find encouragement in anything, religion, film, movies, music, books, whatever. That "devil made me do it" stuff is only for tubes who put logic aside so they can attack and blame whatever they don't like. Responsibility rests solely with the perpetrators.

This is the exact perspective that will ensure mass shootings continue to rise and hate in our country is here to stay.

Bullshit. The only thing that has ever stopped an attack was someone going to the cops and saying this person is making threats, this person is dangerous. Matter of fact, both Parkland and El Paso could have been stopped, the authorities were all warned.

The El Paso shooter was studying violent ideologies and had a whole list of folks he planned to target, including churches. He chose Wal Mart  because he was hungry.

The hateful rhetoric of the left should end also. And stop doxxing people and encouraging harassment.

For at least a year you’ve been peddling this idea that the left is responsible for mass shootings.

Plenty of examples of white Christians shooting in Trumps name but...oh no no no that’s not Trumps fault...it’s the fault of the left somehow.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
misterID wrote:

You're comparing doxxing private citizens with a paper tombstone that says, RIP SOCIALISM?

McConnell is not a private citizen...he’s been publicly on sale for for years to the highest bidder.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:
PaSnow wrote:
misterID wrote:

You're comparing doxxing private citizens with a paper tombstone that says, RIP SOCIALISM?

It also has a gravestone with his running competitor Amy McGrath & Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland has passed but Amy McGrath will now have to be majorly concerned at all speeches. This is just a person 'running' for Senate, we're not talking Secret Service type level of security.

And it was posted on Saturday, hours after the Walmart shooting.

Pa...i think it’s become abundantly clear that these Jack wagons only think it’s bad when the left does it.

mitchejw
 Rep: 131 

Re: US Politics Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Hey anyone know why they didn’t arrest the owners or the employers of the 600 people they detained in Mississippi?

I mean surely they should share as much of the blame is anyone right?

We don’t live in an era where the people on top making decisions obtain any of the responsibility.

IRISH OS1R1S
 Rep: 59 

Re: US Politics Thread

IRISH OS1R1S wrote:

Everything turns in to the left vs right on here. It's like you treat political parties like football teams where you support, unwavering, one side. You should support the men/women who's policy is best for the job, not a party!

That is how it's seems from the outside looking in. I apologize if I'm wrong.

With that said, what are your thoughts on the video below and can we try not turn it in to left vs right?

Go!

misterID
 Rep: 476 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
PaSnow wrote:
misterID wrote:

You're comparing doxxing private citizens with a paper tombstone that says, RIP SOCIALISM?

It also has a gravestone with his running competitor Amy McGrath & Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland has passed but Amy McGrath will now have to be majorly concerned at all speeches. This is just a person 'running' for Senate, we're not talking Secret Service type level of security.

And it was posted on Saturday, hours after the Walmart shooting.

You're still comparing it to screaming outside his home he needs to be stabbed in the heart, outside his home? Political figures encouraging harassment of people and private citizens? You're seriously comparing that to a stupid paper tombstone joke? Sure, it's wrong. They shouldn't have made that stupid joke. But not two weeks ago I heard you were not allowed to even criticize AOC, Omar or Talib because it put their lives in danger.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: US Politics Thread

buzzsaw wrote:
IRISH OS1R1S wrote:

Everything turns in to the left vs right on here. It's like you treat political parties like football teams where you support, unwavering, one side. You should support the men/women who's policy is best for the job, not a party!

That is how it's seems from the outside looking in. I apologize if I'm wrong.

With that said, what are your thoughts on the video below and can we try not turn it in to left vs right?

Go!

[/embed]

Passionate plea?  I don't have to watch the video.  I'm waiting on the logical case that will make an actual difference  I'll watch THAT video if one ever comes out.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 423 

Re: US Politics Thread

buzzsaw wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Hey anyone know why they didn’t arrest the owners or the employers of the 600 people they detained in Mississippi?

I mean surely they should share as much of the blame is anyone right?

We don’t live in an era where the people on top making decisions obtain any of the responsibility.

You're being a douche in your other posts, but you make a good point on this one.  I'd be curious to know as well.  Not mitch's answer either, but an actual answer.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: US Politics Thread

buzzsaw wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Hey anyone know why they didn’t arrest the owners or the employers of the 600 people they detained in Mississippi?

I mean surely they should share as much of the blame is anyone right?

We don’t live in an era where the people on top making decisions obtain any of the responsibility.

You're being a douche in your other posts, but you make a good point on this one.  I'd be curious to know as well.  Not mitch's answer either, but an actual answer.


Because they're building a case, just like they did with the CEO of this company under Bush, that Trump is considering pardoning:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/09/politics … index.html

These were illegals, whom had no right to be here and they had insider information the company was hiring illegals.  Determining who knew what and bringing charges against them requires more time than rounding up a bunch of people we know are illegal.  No one is above the law remember, over half these people had final deportation orders - they had their day in court already and were judged to be removed, and said "fuck that".  The other 300 will get their day in court (if they show), just as the managers who hired them will.  Pass E-Verify.  The "progressive" party is against verifying employment status.  Could it be because they don't really believe some people aren't above the law?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB