You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

Sky Dog wrote:

I really don't care if Axl talks. You almost know what he will say. I just want official confirmation from the label of the release date and the final tracklist. I want the ball out of Axl's hands completely.

bigbri
 Rep: 341 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

bigbri wrote:

If it doesn't see the light of day this time, it never will. Too much going for it this time, and if he finds a way to squander this, it's over.

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

Neemo wrote:

the blame game being played on Mysteron definately is dejavu to the 06 merck ousting

Acquiesce
 Rep: 30 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

Acquiesce wrote:

Spot on, Neemo. They just tossed Mysteron under the bus because Axl's getting cold feet again.

NY Giants82
 Rep: 26 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

NY Giants82 wrote:

Seriously, I wouldnt worry too much about anything right now. Its coming. Sure you would think they would do a press release or something, but nothing is conventional when it comes to GNR. Relax everyone.

war
 Rep: 108 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

war wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:
war wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

Mysteron being responsible. He shot down just about all of MSL's info, which was true, including the Nov. 25th release date & the Best Buy exclusive. He initially shot down the Shackler's Revenge stuff, until it was plainly obvious it was true, then suddenly he jumped on board with the whole "the band hopes to have it be the first single".

If Mysteron doesn't have the scoop, his initial reaction is say it's not true. That's the first sign of a 'bullshitter'.

That's recent.

that's really not what i asked for.


i need quotes, context, etc.

without them i really don't need to prove my point cause we all seem to have a completely different recollection of the events than you.

example: shacklers revenge. as soon as the rumor popped mysteron confirmed it. yet you claim something else.

msl doesn't even count. he is not an insider. he is an intruder. anything he says about gnr - the "insiders" that support the band's  cause are going to refute whether it is true or not. especailly someone further away from axl, like mysteron. he can afford to take a hit on his character if he is wrong in order to protect the already tarnished gnr name. if gnr came out and denied what msl said that would make them look bad when the rumor came to fruition and they cannot afford that. also, the nov. 25 date was not in stone back then and an intruder can afford to guess where as an insider can't report an incorrect release date, which nov. 25th is looking like it is going to be afterall, incorrect.

both of your reasons that he is fake are baseless until you provide better proof.

everything posted here that i have read, has been true -  coming from mysteron. body of lies, rock band, '08 release.

"ALL RECENT" 13

the only thing that hasn't is what you give him credot for: sr being the first single. and he said that they were hoping for it to be the first single not that it for sure would be. which seems to be on par for the way this release has unfolded. lot's of playing things by ear/shooting from the hip.

like i said, you seem to have a different recollection of history than most of us so please provide proof to back your points.

Fine, you win.

There's no way that I can go back and grab quotes and search for posts SIX YEARS back, to give you the shit you need on Mysteron.

I do kind of have a life, and did then. I didn't 'capture pages', because I didn't know in 2003 that i'd have to provide proof to war on GNRevo that Mysteron is full of crap, in 2008.


So I apparently can't back it up... whatever... roll

no need to get like that. i wouldn't have done it either. too busy myself. can we compromise and agree that his predictions have been safe and vague but mostly accurate and pro gnr??? 5

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

RussTCB wrote:

removed

war
 Rep: 108 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

war wrote:

i was wondering the same thing

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

Axlin16 wrote:
war wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:
war wrote:

that's really not what i asked for.


i need quotes, context, etc.

without them i really don't need to prove my point cause we all seem to have a completely different recollection of the events than you.

example: shacklers revenge. as soon as the rumor popped mysteron confirmed it. yet you claim something else.

msl doesn't even count. he is not an insider. he is an intruder. anything he says about gnr - the "insiders" that support the band's  cause are going to refute whether it is true or not. especailly someone further away from axl, like mysteron. he can afford to take a hit on his character if he is wrong in order to protect the already tarnished gnr name. if gnr came out and denied what msl said that would make them look bad when the rumor came to fruition and they cannot afford that. also, the nov. 25 date was not in stone back then and an intruder can afford to guess where as an insider can't report an incorrect release date, which nov. 25th is looking like it is going to be afterall, incorrect.

both of your reasons that he is fake are baseless until you provide better proof.

everything posted here that i have read, has been true -  coming from mysteron. body of lies, rock band, '08 release.

"ALL RECENT" 13

the only thing that hasn't is what you give him credot for: sr being the first single. and he said that they were hoping for it to be the first single not that it for sure would be. which seems to be on par for the way this release has unfolded. lot's of playing things by ear/shooting from the hip.

like i said, you seem to have a different recollection of history than most of us so please provide proof to back your points.

Fine, you win.

There's no way that I can go back and grab quotes and search for posts SIX YEARS back, to give you the shit you need on Mysteron.

I do kind of have a life, and did then. I didn't 'capture pages', because I didn't know in 2003 that i'd have to provide proof to war on GNRevo that Mysteron is full of crap, in 2008.


So I apparently can't back it up... whatever... roll

no need to get like that. i wouldn't have done it either. too busy myself. can we compromise and agree that his predictions have been safe and vague but mostly accurate and pro gnr??? 5

I'll agree that they've been always pro-GN'R.

You have to understand, I think the guy is a total fraud that's just a good guesser, and a good 'word skewer'.

I could make the exact same comments Mysteron makes, and be considered an insider on some boards. There's nothing he's ever said that's been earth-shattering, and his predictions are safe, because that's the only way to keep the act going.

I guess maybe more of my venom lies in the people who feel that Mysteron's word shall never be questioned, not with Mysteron himself. He's never been anything more than friendly with me.

19

war
 Rep: 108 

Re: Fernando vs Mysteron

war wrote:

hey man forget this
check out my new thread!!!!!!!

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB